References
- Atun, P.V., 2013. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp. 133-139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2013.09.00110.1016/j.ejrs.2013.09.001
- Dumitru, P.D., Plopeanu, M., Badea, D., 2013. Comparative study regarding the methods of interpolation. Recent Advances in Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering., pp. 45-52, ISBN: 978-960-474-335-3
- Fernandez, A., Adamowski, J., Petroselli, A., 2016. Analysis of the behavior of three digital elevation model correction methods on critical natural scenarios. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, Volume 8, pp. 304-315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.09.009
- Gillin, C.P., Bailey, S.W., McGuire, K.J., Prisleyt, S.P., 2015. Evaluation of Lidar-derived DEMs through Terrain Analysis and Field Comparison. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Volume 81, Issue 5, pp. 387-396, https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.5.38710.14358/PERS.81.5.387
- Jobin, T., Sabu, J., Thrivikramjic, K.P., Arunkumard, K.S., 2014. Sensitivity of digital elevation models: The scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats, India. Geoscience Frontiers, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp. 893-909, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2013.12.00810.1016/j.gsf.2013.12.008
- Litwin, U., Pijanowski, J. M., Szeptalin, A., Zygmunt, M., 2013. Application of Surfer software in densification of digital terrain model (DTM) grid with the use of scattered points. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape No. 1, pp. 51–61, http://dx.doi.org/10.15576/gLL/2013.1.5110.15576/GLL/2013.1.51
- Oksanen, J., 2006. Digital Elevation Model Error in Terrain Analysis. Academic Dissertation in Geography, Publications of the Finnish Geodetic Institute, Helsinki University Press, ISBN-13: 978-952-10-3350-6
- Patel, A., Katiyar, S.K., Prasad, V., 2016. Performances evaluation of different open source DEM using Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp. 7-16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.12.00410.1016/j.ejrs.2015.12.004
- Suba, N.Sz., Suba, Șt., 2015. Mapping data – Quality, quantity or both? Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, vol. 5(18), issue 1/2015, pp. 101-108, https://doi.org/10.1515/jaes-2015-001310.1515/jaes-2015-0013
- Thomas, I.A., Jordan, P., Shine, O., Fenton, O., Mellander, P.-E., Dunlop, P., Murphy, P.N.C., 2017. Defining optimal DEM resolutions and point densities for modelling hydrologically sensitive areas in agricultural catchments dominated by microtopography. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Volume 54, pp. 38-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.08.01210.1016/j.jag.2016.08.012
- Wise, S.M., 2007. Effect of differing DEM creation methods on the results from a hydrological model. Computers & Geosciences, Volume 33, Issue 10, pp. 1351-1365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.003
- Yang. C-s., Kao, Sz-p., Lee, F-b., Hung, P-s., 2004. Twelve different interpolation methods: A case study of Surfer 8.0. Proceedings of the XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, pp. 778-785, ISSN: 1682-1750