Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Hybrid Methodologies in Understanding Complex Environmental Issues and Promoting Social Justice Cover

The Role of Hybrid Methodologies in Understanding Complex Environmental Issues and Promoting Social Justice

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. [1] Agarwal, B. (1992). The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India. Feminist Studies, 18(1), 119-158. doi:10.2307/3178217
  2. [2] Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744-751. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005
  3. [3] Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2013). The politics of policy paradigms. Governance, 26(2), 193-195. doi:10.1111/gove.12034
  4. [4] Buechler, S., & Hanson, A. S. (2015). A political ecology of women, water and global environmental change. New York: Routledge
  5. [5] Carr, E. R. (2008). Men’s crops and women’s crops: The importance of gender to the understanding of agricultural and development outcomes in Ghana’s central region. World Development, 36(5), 900-915. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.009
  6. [6] Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. (Women of color at the center: Selections from the third national conference on women of color and the law). Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. doi:10.2307/1229039
  7. [7] Cupples, J. (2012). Wild globalization: The biopolitics of climate change and global capitalism on Nicaragua’s mosquito coast. Antipode, 44(1), 10-30. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00834.x
  8. [8] Dah-gbeto, A., & Villamor, G. (2016). Gender-specific responses to climate variability in a semi-arid ecosystem in Northern Benin. Ambio, 45, 297-308. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0830-5
  9. [9] Djoudi, H., & Brockhaus, M. (2011). Is adaptation to climate change gender neutral? Lessons from communities dependent on livestock and forests in northern Mali. The International Forestry Review 13: 123–135
  10. [10] Ely, A., Van Zwanenberg, P., Stirling, A. (2014). Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: approaches to enhance international development, co-ordination and democratisation. Res. Policy 43 (3), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.004
  11. [11] Ensor, J.E., Wennstrom, P., Bhatterai, A., Nightingale, A.J., Eriksen, S., Sillmann, J. (2019). Asking the right questions in adaptation research and practice: Seeing beyond climate impacts in rural Nepal. Environmental Science and Policy 94 227-236
  12. [12] Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. doi:10.2307/3178066
  13. [13] Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford
  14. [14] Hesse-Biber, S. (2012). Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications
  15. [15] Hesse-Biber, S. (2017). The practice of qualitative research: Engaging students in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  16. [16] Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153-175. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x
  17. [17] Hulme, M. (2010). Cosmopolitan climates: Hybridity, foresight and meaning. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2), 267-276. doi:10.1177/0263276409358730
  18. [18] Mather, J. R., Field, R. T., Kalkstein, L. S., & Willmott, C. J. (1980). Climatology: The challenge for the eighties. The Professional Geographer, 32(3), 285-292. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1980.00285.x
  19. [19] Meinzen-Dick, R., Kovarik, C., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2014). Gender and sustainability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39(1), 29-55. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-101813-013240
  20. [20] Mertens, D.M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford
  21. [21] Mertens, D.M. (2014). Mixed methods and wicked problems. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, pp 1-4. doi:10.1177/1558689814562944
  22. [22] Mertens, D.M. & Stewart, N. (2014). The feminist practice of program evaluation. In S.N. Hesse-Biber, ed. Feminist research practice: A primer. (pp. 330-362). 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  23. [23] Mertens, D.M. (2018). Mixed methods design in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. [24] Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. Halifax, N.S : London; Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Fernwood Publications; Zed Books
  25. [25] Murphy, B. L. (2011). From interdisciplinary to inter-epistemological approaches: Confronting the challenges of integrated climate change research. Canadian Geographer /Le Géographe Canadien, 55(4), 490-509. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2011.00388.x
  26. [26] Nightingale, A. (2003). A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 2(1), 77-90
  27. [27] Nightingale, A.J. (2016). Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research. Area 48 (1) 41-7
  28. [28] Nightingale, A., Richardson, D., Castree, N.,Goodchild, M., Kobayashi, A., Liu, W. & Marston, R. (2017). Environment and gender. 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0667.
  29. [29] Omari, K. (2010). Gender and climate change: Botswana case study. Heinrich-Bo¨ll Stiftung, Cape Town. Retrieved 20 July, 2014, from http://www.za.boell.org/downloads/Botswana(1).pdf
  30. [30] Popke, J. (2016). Researching the hybrid geographies of climate change: Reflections from the field. Area 48(1), 2-6. doi:10.1111/area.12220
  31. [31] Raghuram, P., Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Wangari, E. (1998). Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences. doi:10.2307/3060380
  32. [32] Resurrección, B. P. (2013). Persistent women and environment linkages in climate change and sustainable development agendas. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 33-43. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.03.011
  33. [33] Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive: Women, ecology, and development. London; Atlantic Highlands, N.J., USA: Zed Books
  34. [34] Tschakert, P., & Machado, M. (2012). Gender Justice and Rights in Climate Change Adaptation: Opportunities and Pitfalls. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(3), 275-289. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2012.704929
  35. [35] Vij, S., Biesbroek, R., Groot, A., & Termeer, K. (2018). Changing climate policy paradigms in Bangladesh and Nepal. Environmental Science and Policy, 81, 77-85. doi:10.1016/j. envsci.2017.12.010
  36. [36] Villamor, G. B., & Badmos, B. K. (2016). Grazing game a learning tool for adaptive management in response to climate variability in semiarid areas of Ghana. Ecology and Society, 21(1). doi:10.5751/ES-08139-210139
  37. [37] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-6099-1
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 26
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2019
|
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2019
|
Published on: Dec 2, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Sharlene Hesse-Biber, published by Dublin City University, School of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.