Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pronoun omission and agreement: An analysis based on ICE Singapore and ICE India Cover

Pronoun omission and agreement: An analysis based on ICE Singapore and ICE India

By: Iván Tamaredo and  Teresa Fanego  
Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24: 65-87.10.1017/S0022226700011567
  2. Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
  3. Ariel, Mira. 1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30: 3-42.10.1017/S0022226700016170
  4. Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schliperoord and W. Spooren (eds.). Text representation, 29-87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.8.04ari
  5. Bao, Zhiming. 2001. The origins of empty categories in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 16: 275-319.10.1075/jpcl.16.2.03zhi
  6. Barlow, Michael and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  7. Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2004. Indian English: Syntax. In B. Kortmann and E. Schneider et al. (eds.). A handbook of varieties of English, 1116-1130. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  8. Bybee, Joan L. 1998. The emergent lexicon. In M. C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. S. Olson and T. Wysocki (eds.). CLS 34: The panels, 421-435. University of Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
  9. Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Frequency effects on French liaison. In J. L. Bybee and P. J. Hopper (eds.). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 337-359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45.17byb
  10. Bybee, Joan L. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261-290.10.1017/S0954394502143018
  11. Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82: 711-733.10.1353/lan.2006.0186
  12. Bybee, Joan L. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
  13. Bybee, Joan L. and Paul J. Hopper (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45
  14. Bybee, Joan L. and Joanne Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in American English. Linguistics 37: 575-596.10.1515/ling.37.4.575
  15. Bybee, Joan L. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. In M. Juge and J. Moxley (eds.). Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 14-17, 1997: General session and parasession on pragmatics and grammatical structure, 378-388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293
  16. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  17. Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  18. Cole, Melvyn D. 2009. Null subjects: A reanalysis of the data. Linguistics 47: 559-587.10.1515/LING.2009.019
  19. Cole, Melvyn D. 2010. Thematic null subjects and accessibility. Studia Linguistica 64: 271-320.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2010.01172.x
  20. Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
  22. Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In W. Pagliuca (ed.). Perspectives on grammaticalization, 3-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.07hai
  23. Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531-574.
  24. Huang, Yan. 1992. Against Chomsky’s typology of empty categories. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 1-29.10.1016/0378-2166(92)90026-8
  25. Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530
  27. Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Kenneth J. Safir (eds.). 1989. The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3
  28. Kachru, Yamuna. 2006. Hindi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.12
  29. Krug, Manfed. 1998. String frequency: A cognitive motivating factor in coalescence, language processing and linguistic change. Journal of English Linguistics 26: 286-320.
  30. Lange, Claudia. 2012. The syntax of spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g45
  31. Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. 2013. Singapore English: Structure, variation, and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139225755
  32. Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  33. MacWhinney, Brian. 2001. Emergentist approaches to language. In J. L. Bybee and P. J. Hopper (eds.). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 449-470. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45.23mac
  34. Moag, Rodney F. and Robert Poletto. 1991. Discourse level evidence for South Asia as a linguistic area. Language Sciences 3: 229-254.10.1016/0388-0001(91)90016-T
  35. Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2007. Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium. Journal of English Linguistics 35: 157-187.10.1177/0075424207301888
  36. Neeleman, Ad and Kriszta Szendrői. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671-716.10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671
  37. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  38. Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501-558.
  39. Ruppenhofer, Josef and Laura A. Michaelis. 2010. A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames 2: 158-184.10.1075/cf.2.2.02rup
  40. Scheibman, Joanne. 2000. I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 105-124.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00032-6
  41. Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901
  42. Speas, Margaret. 1994. Null arguments in a theory of economy of projection. In E. Benedicto and J. T. Runner (eds.). University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: Functional projections, 179-208. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association, University of Massachusetts.
  43. Speas, Margaret. 2006. Economy, agreement and the representation of null arguments. In P. Ackema, P. Brandt, M. Shoorlemmer and F. Weerman (eds.). Arguments and agreement, 35-75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  44. Taraldsen, Knut T. 1980. On the nominative island condition, vacuous application, and the that-trace filter. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  45. Wee, Lionel. 2004. Singapore English: Morphology and syntax. In B. Kortmann and E. Schneider et al. (eds.). A handbook of varieties of English, 1116-1130. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2016-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1502-5462 | Journal ISSN: 0801-5775
Language: English
Page range: 95 - 118
Published on: Apr 14, 2016
Published by: The International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Iván Tamaredo, Teresa Fanego, published by The International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.