Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On Multiset Ordering Cover
Open Access
|Dec 2016

Abstract

Formalization of a part of [11]. Unfortunately, not all is possible to be formalized. Namely, in the paper there is a mistake in the proof of Lemma 3. It states that there exists xM1 such that M1(x) > N1(x) and (∀yN1)xy. It should be M1(x) ⩾ N1(x). Nevertheless we do not know whether xN1 or not and cannot prove the contradiction. In the article we referred to [8], [9] and [10].

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forma-2016-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1898-9934 | Journal ISSN: 1426-2630
Language: English
Page range: 95 - 106
Submitted on: Dec 31, 2015
|
Published on: Dec 8, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Grzegorz Bancerek, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.