Transactional Distance And Autonomy In A Distance Learning Environment

Vasiloudis, G.; Koutsouba, M.; Giossos, Y.; Mavroidis, I.

doi:10.1515/eurodl-2015-0008

Abstract

This paper studies the transactional distance between the students and the tutor as well as the autonomy of students in a postgraduate course of the Hellenic Open University (HOU). The aim of the paper is to examine how the relation between autonomy and transactional distance evolves during an academic year and how this relation is affected by demographic parameters, such as gender, age group and student experience (year of studies). For this purpose an empirical research was conducted and a sample of postgraduate students responded to a questionnaire (which included a scale for transactional distance, a scale for autonomy and demographic questions) during two different time periods within an academic (2012-2013). The results of the statistical analysis showed that during the evolution of the learning process there was a small change in transactional distance, especially for the dimension of co-understanding, while there was also a change in one of the dimensions of autonomy, namely sensitivity to others. However, no relation was observed between transactional distance and autonomy, ether in the first or the second measurement during the academic year. This finding is also regarded in the overall framework of the different critiques and interpretations of Moore’s theory.

References

1. Bekker, M.H.J. (1993). The development of an Autonomy scale based on recent insights into gender identity. In European Journal of Personality, 7, (pp. 177-194).10.1002/per.2410070304
Search in Google Scholar
2. Bekker, M.H.J.; Bachrach, N.; Croon, M.A. (2007). The relationships of antisocial behavior with attachment, autonomy-connectedness, and alexithymia. In Journal of Critical Psychology, 63(6), (pp. 507-527).10.1002/jclp.20363
Search in Google Scholar
3. Bekker, M.H.J. and Belt, U. (2006). The role of autonomy-connectedness in anxiety and depression. In Depression and Anxiety, 23, (pp. 274-280).10.1002/da.20178
Search in Google Scholar
4. Bekker, M.H.J.; Hens, G.; Nijssen, A. (2001). Stress prevention training; Sex differences in types of stressors, coping, and training effects. In Stress and Health, 17, (pp. 207-218).10.1002/smi.900
Search in Google Scholar
5. Bekker, M.H.J. and van Assen, M.A.L.M. (2006). A short form of the Autonomy scale: Properties of the Autonomy–Connectedness Scale. In Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, (pp. 51-60).10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_07
Search in Google Scholar
6. Bekker, M.H.J. and van Assen, M.A.L.M. (2008). Autonomy-Connectedness and Gender. In Sex Roles, 59, (pp. 532-544).10.1007/s11199-008-9447-x
Search in Google Scholar
7. Bischoff, W.R. (1993). Transactional distance, interactive television, and electronic mail communication in graduate public health and nursing courses: Implications for professional education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Search in Google Scholar
8. Bischoff, W.R.; Bisconer, S.W.; Kooker, B.M.; Woods, L.C. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. In American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), (pp. 4-19).10.1080/08923649609526937
Search in Google Scholar
9. Chen, Y.J. (1997). The implications of Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
Search in Google Scholar
10. Chen, Y.J. (2001a). Transactional distance in world wide web learning environments. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), (pp. 327-338).10.1080/14703290110074533
Search in Google Scholar
11. Chen, Y.J. (2001b). Dimensions of transactional distance in world wide web learning environment: A factor analysis. In British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), (pp. 459-470).10.1111/1467-8535.00213
Search in Google Scholar
12. Chen, Y.J. and Willits, F.K. (1998). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), (pp. 51-65).
Search in Google Scholar
13. Force, D. (2004). Relationships among transactional distance variables in asynchronous computer conferences: A correlational study. Unpublished master thesis. Athabasca University, Athabasca.
Search in Google Scholar
14. Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for Distance Education in the 21^st century: A swift from structural to transactional issues. In The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1). Available at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewFile/2/2210.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2
Search in Google Scholar
15. Giossos, I. (2009). Validity and reliability for transactional distance scales in the Hellenic Open University. Master dissertation. School of Humanities, Hellenic Open University, Patras.
Search in Google Scholar
16. Giossos, Y.; Koutsouba, M.; Lionarakis, A.; Skavantzos, K. (2009). Reconsidering Moore’s transactional distance theory. In European Journal of Open Distance and ELearning, 2009/II. Available at http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2009&halfyear=2&article=374
Search in Google Scholar
17. Giossos, I.; Koutsouba, I.M.; Mavroidis, I. (2011). Validating a scale for transactional distance in distance education. In A. Lionarakis (ed.), Alternative Forms of Education, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Open and Distance Learning, (pp. 303-310). Available at http://icodl.openet.gr/index.php/icodl/2011/schedConf/presentations
Search in Google Scholar
18. Gorsky, A. and Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance. In The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), (pp. 1-11).
Search in Google Scholar
19. Huang, H.M. (2002). Student perceptions in an online mediated environment. In International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), (pp. 405-422).
Search in Google Scholar
20. Kanuka, H.; Collet, D.; Caswell, C. (2002). University instructor perceptions of use of asynchronous text-based discussion in distance courses. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), (pp. 151-167).10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_3
Search in Google Scholar
21. Kassandrinou, A.; Angelaki, Ch.; Mavroidis, I. (2014). Transactional distance among open university students. How does it affect the learning process. In European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), (pp. 26-42). Available at http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2014/Kassandrinou_et_al.pdf
Search in Google Scholar
22. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education, (pp. 22-38). Routledge, New York.
Search in Google Scholar
23. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2^nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Massachusetts.
Search in Google Scholar
24. Saba, F. (1988). Integrated telecommunication systems and instructional transaction. In American Journal of Distance Education, 2(3), (pp. 17-24).10.1080/08923648809526632
Search in Google Scholar
25. Saba, F. and Shearer, R. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. In The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), (pp. 36-59).10.1080/08923649409526844
Search in Google Scholar
26. Starr-Glass, D. (2012). Learners perceptions of distance in an online course: revisiting Moore’s theory of transactional distance. Unpublished paper.
Search in Google Scholar

Transactional Distance And Autonomy In A Distance Learning Environment

Abstract

Paradigm

My account