Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bird Communities and Vegetation Composition in the Urban Forest Ecosystem: Correlations and Comparisons of Diversity Indices Cover

Bird Communities and Vegetation Composition in the Urban Forest Ecosystem: Correlations and Comparisons of Diversity Indices

Open Access
|Dec 2017

References

  1. Angelstam, P. & Mikusinski G. (1994). Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest - a review. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 31(1), 157−172.
  2. Anuchin, N. (1977). Forest taxation (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.
  3. Assadi, S.B., Kaboli, M., Etemad, V., Khanaposhtani, M.G. & Tohidifar M. (2015). Habitat selection of cavitynesting birds in the Hyrcanian deciduous forests of northern Iran. Ecol. Res., 30(5), 889−897. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-015-1293-z.10.1007/s11284-015-1293-z
  4. Atemasova, T. (2015). A structure of bird communities at forests park zone of Kharkov (Ukraine). Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin, Natural Sciences, 30(3), 74−81.
  5. Barbarich, A. (1977). Geobotanical subdivision of Ukraine (in Ukrainian). Kyiv: Science.
  6. Batary, P., Fronczek, S., Normann, C., Scherber, C. & Tscharntke T. (2014). How do edge effect and tree species diversity change bird diversity and avian nest survival in Germany’s largest deciduous forest? For. Ecol. Manag., 319, 44−50. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.004.10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.004
  7. Bergner, A., Avci, M., Eryiğit, H., Jansson, N., Niklasson, M., Westerberg, L. & Milberg P. (2015). Influences of forest type and habitat structure on bird assemblages of oak (Quercus spp.) and pine (Pinus spp.) stands in southwestern Turkey. For. Ecol. Manag., 336, 137−147. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.025.10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.025
  8. Bibby, C., Burgess, N., Hill, D. & Mustoe S. (2000). Bird census techniques. London: Academic Press.
  9. Blinkova, O. (2014). Synphytoindication recreational ecological changes conditions of plant formation in protected areas the Borzhava, Zakarpatska lowland. Odesa National University Herald Biology, 19(2), 21−33.
  10. Blondel, J. & Сuvillier R. (1977). Une methode simple et rapide pour decrier les habitats d’oiseaux: le stratiscope. Oikos, 29, 326−331. DOI: 10.2307/3543622.10.2307/3543622
  11. Bragin, E. & Bragina T. (2014). Modern composition and structure of the avifauna Naurzum reserve. Journal of Omsk University, 2, 98−101.
  12. Braun-Blanquet, J. (1964). Pflanzensoziologie, grundzuge der vegetationskunde. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2
  13. Brockerhoff, E.G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J.A., Quine, Ch.P. & Sayer J. (2008). Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers. Conserv., 17(5), 925−951. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x.10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x
  14. Burda, R. (2006). Trends change of phytodiversity in agricultural landscapes of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of National Agricultural University of Ukraine, 93, 1−15.
  15. Bykov, E. (2011). Recreational transformation of deciduous forests and the species structure of the breeding bird fauna. Izv. Penz. Gos. Pedagog. Univ. im V.G. Belinskogo, 25, 170−175.
  16. Camprodon, J. & Brotons L. (2006). Effects of undergrowth clearing on the bird communities of the Northwestern Mediterranean Coppice Holm oak forests. For. Ecol. Manag., 221(1−3), 72−82. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.044.10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.044
  17. Carlson, A., Sandstrom, U. & Olsson K. (1998). Availability and use of natural tree holes by cavity nesting birds in a Swedish deciduous forest. Ardea, 86(1), 109−119.
  18. Catsadorakis, G. (1997). Breeding birds from reed beds to alpine meadows. Hydrobiologia, 351, 143−155. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003080911744.10.1023/A:1003080911744
  19. Chaplygina, A., Shupova, T. & Nadtochiy A. (2016). The avifauna of the National Nature Park ≪Homilshanski Lisy≫. Visn. Dnipropetr Univ. Ser. Biol. Ecol., 24(1), 124−133.10.15421/011615
  20. Conner, R.N. & Dickson J.G. (1997). Relationships between bird communities and forest age, structure, species composition and fragmentation in the west gulf coastal plain. Texas J. Sci., 49(Suppl. 3), 123−138.
  21. Didukh, Y. (1994). Phytoindication of ecological factors (in Russian). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
  22. Domokos, E. & Domokos J. (2016). Bird communities of different woody vegetation types from the Niraj Valley, Romania. Turk. J. Zool., 40, 734−742. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1510-64.10.3906/zoo-1510-64
  23. Dranzoa, Ch. (1998). The avifauna 23 years after logging in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biodivers. Conserv., 7, 777−797. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008892419940.10.1023/A:1008892419940
  24. Easton, W.E. & Martin K. (2002). Effects of thinning and herbicide treatments on nest- site selection by songbirds in young, managed forests. Auk, 119, 685−694. DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0685:EOTAHT]2.0.CO;2.10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0685:EOTAHT]2.0.CO;2
  25. Erdelen, M. (1984). Bird communities and vegetation structure: I. Correlations and comparisons of simple and diversity indices. Oecologia, 61, 277−284. DOI: 10.1007/BF00396773.10.1007/BF00396773
  26. Erofeev, I. (1960). Vinnica (in Russian). Moscow: Education.
  27. Etterson, M.A., Etterson, J.R. & Cuthbert F.J. (2007). A robust new method for analyzing community change and an example using 83 years of avian response to forest succession. Biol. Conserv., 138(3−4), 381−389. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.003.10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.003
  28. Felton, A., Hedwall, P.O., Lindbladh, M., Nyberg, T., Felton, A.M., Holmstrom, E., Wallin, I., Lof, M. & Brunet J. (2016). The biodiversity contribution of wood plantations: Contrasting the bird communities of Sweden’s protected and production oak forests. For. Ecol. Manag., 365(1), 51−60. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.030.10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.030
  29. Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D.B., Blomberg, S.P., Montague-Drake, R., Felton, A. & Stein J.A. (2007). Functional richness and relative resilience of bird communities in regions with different land use intensities. Ecosystems, 10(6), 964−974. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9071-6.10.1007/s10021-007-9071-6
  30. Fuller, R.J. & Moreton B.D. (1987). Breeding bird population of Kentish sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) coppice in relation to age and structure of the coppice. J. Appl. Ecol., 24(1), 13−27. DOI: 10.2307/2403784.10.2307/2403784
  31. Gabbe, A.P., Robinson, S.K. & Brawn J.D. (2002). Tree-species preferences of foraging insectivorous birds: implications for floodplain forest restoration. Conserv. Biol., 16(2), 462−470. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00460.x.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00460.x
  32. Gardner, T., Barlow, J., Araujo, I., Avila-Pires, T., Bonaldo, A., Costa, J., Esposito, M., Ferreira,L., Hawes, J., Hernandez, M., Hoogmoed, M., Leite, R., Lo-Man-Hung, N., Malcolm, J., Martins, M., Mestre, L., Miranda-Santos, R., Overal, W., Parry, L., Peters, S., Ribeiro-Junior, M., da Silva, M. & Peres C. (2008). The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol. Lett., 11(2), 139−150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x
  33. Gill, R. (2006). Influence of large herbivores on tree recruitment and forest dynamics. In K. Danell, R. Bergstrom, P. Duncan & J. Pastor (Eds.), Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge Scientific Press.
  34. Giltena, A., Saura, S. & Brotons L. (2007). Effects of forest composition and structure on bird species richness in a Mediterranean context: implications for forest ecosystem management. For. Ecol. Manag., 242(2−3), 470−476. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.080.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.080
  35. Graham, C., Wilson, M., Gittings, T., Kelly, T., Irwin, S., Sweeney, O. & O’Halloran J. (2014). Factors affecting the bird diversity of planted and semi-natural oak forests in Ireland. Bird Study, 61, 309−320. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2014.927415.10.1080/00063657.2014.927415
  36. Heyman, E. (2010). Clearance of understory in urban woodlands: assessing impact on bird abundance and diversity. For. Ecol. Manag. 260(1), 125−131. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.011.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.011
  37. Hiby, L. & Krishna M. (2001). Line transect sampling from a curving path. Biometrics, 57(3), 727−731. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00727.x.10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00727.x
  38. Hinsley, S., Bellamy, P., Newton, I. & Sparks T. (1995). Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments. J. Avian Biol., 26, 94−104. DOI: 10.2307/367705710.2307/3677057
  39. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress (Internet) (2012). Melbourne: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. (cited 2016 Dec 5). Available from: http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php
  40. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences (Internet) (1999). London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature. (cited 2017 Apr 12). Available from: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted-sites/iczn/code/
  41. Isotti, R., Luiselli, L. & Fanfani A. (2014). Null model analysis of community structure reveals that patch quality influences the conservation of complex bird communities in mediterranean habitats. Revue d, Ecologie (Terre Vie), 69(2), 120−130. http://hdl.handle.net/2042/5599210.3406/revec.2014.1722
  42. James, F. & Wamer N. (1982). Relationships between temperate forest bird communities and vegetation structure. Ecology, 63, 159−171. DOI: 10.2307/1937041.10.2307/1937041
  43. Järvinen, O. & Vaisanen R.A. (1975). Estimating relative densities of breeding birds by the line transect method. Oikos, 26(3), 316−322. DOI: 10.2307/3543502.10.2307/3543502
  44. Katsimanis, N., Dretakis, D., Akriotis, T. & Mylonas M. (2006). Breeding bird assemblages of eastern Mediterranean shrublands: composition, organisation and patterns of diversity. Journal of Ornithology, 147(3), 419−427. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-005-0024-6.10.1007/s10336-005-0024-6
  45. Klausnitzer, B. (1990). Ecology of urban fauna (in Russian). Moscow: Mir.
  46. Kurlavichus, P. (1986). Biotopic distribution of birds in agrarian plantations. Vilnjus: Mokslas.
  47. Lavrov, V., Blinkova, O., Miroshnik, N. & Ivanenko O. (2016). Synecological principles of diagnostics of transformation of structural and functional organization of forest ecosystems in the evolutionary aspect. Factors in Experimental Evolution Organisms, 18, 186−190.
  48. Lewis, K. & Starzomski B. (2015). Bird communities and vegetation associations across a treeline ecotone in the Mealy Mountains, Labrador, which is an understudied part of the boreal forest. Can. J. Zool., 93(2), 477−486. DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2014-0309.10.1139/cjz-2014-0309
  49. MacArthur, R. & MacArthur J. (1961). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42, 594−598. DOI: 10.2307/1932254.10.2307/1932254
  50. Magurran, A. (1998). Ecological diversity and its measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  51. Marczynski, W. (1977). Statistical-topographical and historical description of Podolsk province with drawings and maps (in Ukraniain). Kiev: Nauk Dumka.
  52. Martin, J.-L. & Joron M. (2003). Nest predation in forest birds: influence of predator type and predator’s habitat quality. Oikos, 102, 641−653. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12040.x.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12040.x
  53. Marzluff, J., Gehlbach, F. & Manuwal D. (1998). Urban environments: influences on avifauna and challenges for the avian conservationist. In J.M. Marzluff & R. Sallabanks (Eds.), Avian conservation: research and management. Washington: Island Press.
  54. Migunova, E. (1993). Forests and forest land (quantitative assessment of relationships) (in Russian). Moscow: Ecology.
  55. Mikusinski, G., Gromadzki, M. & Chylarecki P. (2001). Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conserv. Biol., 15(1), 208−217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99236.x
  56. Mirkin, V., Naumova, L. & Solomeshh A. (2002). The modern science of vegetation (in Russian). Moscow: Logos.
  57. Moreno-Rueda, G. & Pizzaro M. (2009). Relative influence of habitat heterogeneity, climate, human disturbance, and spatial structure on vertebrate species richness in Spain. Ecol. Res., 24(2), 335−344. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-008-0509-x.10.1007/s11284-008-0509-x
  58. Mosyakin, S. & Fedoronchuk M. (1999). Vascular plants of Ukraine a nomenclatural checklist. Kyiv: MG Kholodny Institute Botany.
  59. Muntaner, J., Ferrer, X. & Martınaez-Vilalta A. (1983). Atles dels ocells nidificants de Catalunya i Andorra. Barcelona: Ketres Editora.
  60. Neshataev, J. (1987). Methods of analysis of geobotanical materials (in Russian). Leningrad: University.
  61. Novikov, G. (1953). Field studies on the ecology of terrestrial vertebrates (in Russian). Moscow: Soviet Science.
  62. O’Сonnor, R. (1981). Habitat correlates of bird distribution in British census plots. Studies in Avian Biology, 6, 533−537.
  63. Pereira, P., Godinho, C., Roque, I., Marques, A., Branco, M. & Rabaca J.E. (2014). Time to rethink the management intensity in a Mediterranean oak woodland: the response of insectivorous birds and leaf-chewing defoliators as key groups in the forest ecosystem. Ann. For Sci., 71(1), 25−32. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-012-0227-y.10.1007/s13595-012-0227-y
  64. Polyakov, A. (2009). Crimea forest formations and their ecological role (in Russian). Kharkiv: New Word.
  65. Poulsen, B. (2002). Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: tree variables important to birds and their conservation. Biodivers. Conserv., 11, 1551−1566. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016839518172.10.1023/A:1016839518172
  66. Rabotnov, T. (1992). Phytocenology (in Russian). Moscow: Science.
  67. Ramenskii, L. (1971). Problems and methods of studying vegetation cover (in Russian). Leningrad: Nauka.
  68. Robles, H., Ciudad, C. & Matthysen E. (2011). Tree-cavity occurrence, cavity occupation and reproductive performance of secondary cavity-nesting birds in oak forests: The role of traditional management practices. For. Ecol. Manag., 261(8), 1428−1435. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.029.10.1016/j.foreco.2011.01.029
  69. Robles, H., Ciudad, C. & Matthysen E. (2012). Responses to experimental reduction and increase of cavities by a secondary cavity-nesting bird community in cavity-rich Pyrenean oak forests. For. Ecol. Manag., 277, 46−53. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.017.10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.017
  70. Rodewald, A. & Abrams M. (2002). Floristics and avian community structure: implications for regional changes in eastern forest composition. J. For. Sci., 48, 267−272.10.1093/forestscience/48.2.267
  71. Roth, R. (1976). Spatial heterogeneity and bird species diversity. Ecology, 57, 773−782. DOI: 10.2307/1936190.10.2307/1936190
  72. Rusin, L. (2003). Monitoring of recreational forests (in Russian). Moscow: Ran.
  73. Salek, M., Svobodova, J. & Zasadil P. (2010). Edge effect of low-traffic forest roads on bird communities in second ary production forests in central Europe. Lands. Ecol., 25(7), 1113−1124. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-010-9487-9.10.1007/s10980-010-9487-9
  74. Sanchez, S., Javier-Cuervo, J. & Moreno E. (2012). Vegetation structure in beech-fir forests: effects on the avian community. Revue d, Ecologie. (Terre Vie), 67, 213−222. http://hdl.handle.net/2042/5591410.3406/revec.2012.1635
  75. Sangster, G., Collinson, J., Crochet, P., Kirwan, G., Knox, A., Parkin, D. & Votier S. (2016). Taxonomic recommendations for Western Palearctic birds: 11th report. Ibis, 158(1), 206−212. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12322.10.1111/ibi.12322
  76. Sanitary Forest Regulation in Ukraine (1995). Resolution of government of Ukraine. No. 555 (July 27, 1995).
  77. Sekercioğlu, C. (2002). Effects of forestry practices on vegetation structure and bird community of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biol. Conserv., 107(2), 229−240. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00097-6.10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00097-6
  78. Sekercioğlu, C. (2006). Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21(8), 464−471. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.00710.1016/j.tree.2006.05.00716762448
  79. Seymour, C., Simmons, R., Joseph, G. & Slingsby J. (2015). On bird functional diversity: species richness and functional differentiation show contrasting responses to rainfall and vegetation structure in an Arid Landscape. Ecosystems, 18(6), 971−984. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-015-9875-8.10.1007/s10021-015-9875-8
  80. Shirihai, H., Gargallo, G. & Helbig A. (2001). Sylvia Warblers. In Ch. Helm (Ed.), Identification, taxonomy and phylogeny of the Genus Sylvia. London: Black.
  81. Stefanova, M. & Salek M. (2014). Effects of integrated farming on herbal and bird species diversity in Czech agricultural landscapes. Pol. J. Ecol., 62, 147−162. DOI: 10.3161/104.062.0114.10.3161/104.062.0114
  82. Snow, D. & Perrins C. (1998). The birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. 2: Passerines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  83. Shupova, T. (2001). The present state of the number of roller (Coracias garrulus). Visn. Dnipropetr Univ. Ser. Biol. Ecol., 9(2), 119−123.
  84. Shupova, T. & Chaplygina A. (2016). The avifauna of the reserve of national importance ≪Luchkivskiy≫. J. Karazin Kharkiv National Univ. Ser. Biol., 26, 148−156.
  85. Shupova, T. (2017). The transformation of the diversity of avifauna under the influence of recreational load. Biosyst. Divers., 25(1), 45−51. DOI: 10.15421/011707.10.15421/011707
  86. Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielborger, K., Wichmann, M.C., Schwager, M. & Jeltsch F. (2004). Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr., 31(1), 79−92. DOI: 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x.10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x
  87. Thiollay, J. (1997). Disturbance, selective logging and bird diversity: aneotropical forest study. Biodivers. Conserv., 6, 1155−1173. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018388202698.10.1023/A:1018388202698
  88. Virkkala, R. (2006). Why study woodpeckers? The significance of woodpeckers in forest ecosystems. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 43(2), 82−85.
  89. Walther, B. (2002). Vertical stratification and use of vegetation and light habitats by Neotropical forest birds. Journal of Ornithology, 143, 64−81. DOI: 10.1007/BF02465460.10.1007/BF02465460
  90. Wen, W., Maruyama, N., Bo-Wen, L., Morimoto, H. & Zhong-Xin G. (2002). Relationships between bird communities and vegetation structure in Honghua’erji, northern inner Mongolia. J. For. Res., 13(4), 294−298. DOI: 10.1007/BF02860095.10.1007/BF02860095
  91. Westphal, M., Field, S., Tyre, A., Paton, D. & Possingham H. (2003). Effects of landscape pattern on bird species distribution in the Mt. Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landsc. Ecol., 18, 413−426. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026115807529.10.1023/A:1026115807529
  92. Whelan, C., Wenny, D. & Marquis R. (2008). Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1134(1), 25−60. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1439.003.10.1196/annals.1439.00318566089
  93. Wilson, M. (1974). Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology, 55, 1017−1029. DOI: 10.2307/1940352.10.2307/1940352
  94. Wilson, M., de Santo, T. & Sabag C. (1994). Avian community of fragmented south-temperate rainforests in Chile. Conserv. Biol., 8, 508−520. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08020508.x.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08020508.x
  95. Wilson, M., Pithon, J., Gittings, T., Kelly, T., Giller, P. & O’Halloran J. (2006). Effects of growth stage and tree species composition on breeding bird assemblages of plantation forests. Bird Study, 53(3), 225−236. DOI: 10.1080/00063650609461437.10.1080/00063650609461437
  96. Zavjalov, E., Shljahtin, G., Tabachishin, V. & Jakushev N. (2005). Ecological-faunistic characteristic by avifauna of the north of Lower Volga region. J. Saratov Univ. Ser. Chem. Biol. Ecol., 2, 49−59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2017-0029 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Language: English
Page range: 366 - 387
Published on: Dec 21, 2017
Published by: Institute of Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Olena Blinkova, Tetyana Shupova, published by Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.