Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Small terrestrial mammals living along streams acting as natural landscape barriers Cover

Small terrestrial mammals living along streams acting as natural landscape barriers

Ekológia (Bratislava)
Volume 35 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2016
References

References

  1. Aars, J., Ims, R.A., Liu, H.P., Mulvey, M. & Smith M.H. (1998). Bank voles in linear habitats show restricted gene flow as revealed by mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA).., 7, 1383–1389. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00487.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, D.C., Wilson, K.R., Miller, M.S. & Falck M. (2000). Movement patterns of riparian small mammals during predictable floodplain inundation.., 81(4), 1087–1099. DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<1087:MPORSM>2.0.CO;2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Bąkowski, C. & Kozakiewicz M. (1988). The effect of forest road on bank vole and yellow-necked mouse populations.., 33, 345–353.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Begon, M., Harper, J.L. & Townsend C.R. (1990).. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Bejček, V. & Šťastný K. (2003). The importance of floodplains for terrestrial vertebrates (in Czech). In K. Prach, D. Pithart & T. Francírková (Eds.),(pp. 30–36). Třeboň: Botanický ústav AV ČR.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, A.F. (2003).. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge: IUCN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Bryja, J. & Řehák Z. (1998). Community of small terrestrial mammals (Insectivora, Rodentia) in dominant habitats of the Protected Landscape Area of Poodří (Czech Republic).., 47(4), 249–260.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Bryja, J., Zukal, J., 2000: Small mammal communities in newly planted biocorridors and their surroundings in southern Moravia (Czech Republic).., 49, 3: 191–197.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Bürger, P., Anděra, M. & Zbytovský P. (1987). Mammals of Blanský les-Šumava foothills (in Czech)., 23, 5–42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Cook, W.M., Timm, R.M. & Hyman D.E. (2001). Swimming ability in three Costa Rican dry forest rodents.., 49(3-4), 1177–1181.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Forman, R.T.T. & Godron M. (1993).. Praha: Academia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Gaines, M.S. & McClenaghan L.R. (1980). Dispersal in small mammals.., 11, 163–196.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Gerlach, G. & Musolf K. (2000). Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision in bank voles.., 14, 1066–1074. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98519.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Giannoni, S.M., Borghi, C.E. & Martinezrica J.P. (1994). Ability of the mediterranean pine vole().., 39(3), 257–265.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Hafner, J.C. & Hafner M.S. (1975). Water as a potential barrier to dispersal in Microdipodops.., 56, 911–914. DOI: 10.2307/1379663.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Hirota, T., Hirohata, T., Mashima, H., Satoh, T. & Obara Y. (2004). Population structure of the large Japanese field mouse,(Rodentia: Muridae), in suburban landscape, based on mitochondrial D-loop sequences.., 13, 3275–3282. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02324.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Holišová, V. (1969). Vertical movements of some small mammals in a forest., 18, 121−141.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Ims, R.A. & Andreassen H.P. (2005). Density-dependent dispersal and spatial population dynamics., 272(1566), 913–918. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3025.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Jacob, J. (2003). The response of small mammal populations to flooding.., 68, 102–111. DOI:10.1078/1616-5047-00068.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Keller, L.F. & Waller D.M. (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild population.., 17, 230–241. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Kozakiewicz, A. (1985). Lakeside communities of small mammals.., 30(9), 171–191.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Kozakiewicz, M., Chołuj, A. & Kozakiewicz A. (2007). Long-distance movements of individuals in a free-living bank vole population: an important element of male strategy.., 52(4), 339–348. DOI: 10.1007/BF03194231.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Kozakiewicz, M., Kozakiewicz, A., 2008: Long-term dynamics and biodiversity changes in small mammal communities in a mosaic of agricultural and forest habitats.., 45, 263–269.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Kozakiewicz, M., Gortat, T., Panagiotopoulou, H., Gryczyńska-Siemiątkowska, A., Rutkowski, R., Kozakiewicz, A. & Abramowicz K. (2009). The spatials genetic structure of bank vole () and yellow-necked mouse () populations: The effect of distance and habitat barriers.., 59, 169–187. DOI: 10.1163/157075609X437691.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Krištofík, J. (1999). Small mammals in floodplain forests.., 48(3), 173–184.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Lantová, P., Šíchová, K., Sedláček, F. & Lanta V. (2011). Determining behavioural syndromes in voles – the effects of social environment., 117, 124–132. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01860.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Lugon-Moulin, N. & Hausser J. (2002). Phylogeographical structure, postglacial recolonization and barriers to gene flow in the distinctive Valais chromosome race of the common shrew ().., 11, 785–794. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01469.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Májsky, J. (1985).. Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Marsh, A.C.W., Poulton, S. & Harris S. (2001). The yelow-necked mousein Britain: status and analysis of factors affecting distribution.., 31(3−4), 203–227. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2001.00089.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Martin, J.G.A. & Réale D. (2008). Temperament, risk assessment and novelty in eastern chipmunks,.., 75, 309–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.05.026.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Mazurkiewicz, M. & Rajska-Jurgiel E. (1998). Spatial behaviour and population dynamics of woodland rodents.., 43(2), 137–161.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Merriam, G., Kozakiewicz, M., Tsuchiya, E. & Hawley K. (1989). Barriers as boundaries for metapopulations and demes ofin farm landscapes.., 2, 227–235. DOI: 10.1007/BF00125093.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Nicolas, V. & Colyn M. (2006). Swimming ability of 5 species of African rainforest murid rodents in relation to their habitat preferences.., 45(2), 264–268.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Obrtel, R. & Holišová V. (1974). Trophic niches ofandin a lowland for est., 8, 1–37.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Pelikán, J. (1975). Mammals of Nesyt fishpond, their ecology and production., 9(12), 1–45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Pocock, M.J.O., Hauffe, H.C. & Searle J.B. (2005). Dispersal in house mice.., 84(3), 565–583. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00455.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Reiter, A., Hanák, V., Benda, P. & Obuch J. (1997). Mammals of the Podyjí National Park (in Czech)., 28: 5–141.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Rico, A., Kindlmann, P. & Sedláček F. (2007a). Barrier effects of roads on movements of small mammals.., 56(1), 1–12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Rico, A., Kindlmann, P. & Sedláček F. (2007b). Road crossing in bank voles and yellow-necked mouse.., 52, 85–94. DOI: 10.1007/BF03194203.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Rico, A., Kindlmann, P. & Sedláček F. (2009). Can the barrier effect of highways cause genetic subdivision in small mammals?., 54, 297–310. DOI: 10.4098/j.at.0001-7051.068.2008.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Rodriguez, A., Crema, G. & Delibes M. (1996). Use of non-wildlife passages across a high speed railway by terrestrial vertebrates.., 33, 1527–1540. DOI: 10.2307/2404791.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Rosenberg, D.K., Noon, B.R. & Meslow E.Ch. (1997). Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy., 47(10), 677–687. DOI: 10.2307/1313208.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Smith, J.E. & Batzli G.O. (2006). Dispersal and mortality of prairie voles () in fragmented landscapes: a field experiment., 112(1), 209–217. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.13431.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Spackman, S.C. & Hughes J.W. (1995). Assesment of minimum stream corridor width for biological conservation: species richness and distribution along mid-order stress in Vermont, USA.., 71, 325–332. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00055-U.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Stenseth, N.C. & Lidicker W.Z., Jr. (1992).. London: Chapman and Hall.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Suchomel, J. & Heroldová M. (2004). Small terrestrial mammals in two types of forest complexes in intensively managed landscape of South Moravia (The Czech Republic)., 23(4), 377–384.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Šmaha, J. (1996). Notes on the mammal fauna of the Křivoklátsko Biosphere Reserve (in Czech)., 27, 37–57.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Šťastný, K. (1985).. České Budějovice: Jihočeské Muzeum v Českých Budějovicích.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Wijnhoven, S., van der Velde, G., Leuven, R.S.E.W. & Smits A.J.M. (2005). Flooding ecology of voles, mice and shrews: the importance of geomorphological and vegetational heterogeneity in river floodplains.., 50, 453–472. DOI: 10.1007/BF03192639.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Wolff, J.O. (1999). Behavioral model systems. In G.W. Barrett & J.D. Peles (Eds.),(pp. 11−40). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Wolton, R.J. (1985). Spatial distribution and movements of wood mice, yellow-necked mice and bank voles.., 55, 249–275.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Zar, J.H. (1999).. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Zejda, J. (1973). Small mammals in certain forest type groups in Southern Moravia.., 22, 1–13.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Zima, J., Obuch, J., Kopcová-Klodová, G., Kovařík, M. & Gaisler J. (1999). Insectivores and rodents of Moravian karst and surrounding areas (in Czech)., 29, 77–94.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1337-947X | Journal ISSN: 1335-342X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 191 - 204
Published on: May 28, 2016
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
barrier,
mobility,
CMR,
Apodemus flavicollis,
Myodes glareolus
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Chemistry, other,
Geosciences,
Geography,
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2016 Tomáš Bohdal, Josef Navrátil, František Sedláček, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 35 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Previous article