On two modern hybrid forms of consequentialism

Švaňa, Lukáš

doi:10.1515/ebce-2016-0014

Abstract

The article deals with two consequentialist theories and their comparison in terms of promoting certain values and evaluation of moral agents’ actions and behaviour. A basic presupposition is their mutual compatibility based primarily on their consequentialist nature. The paper searches for possible evidence that presented theories might be denominated as hybrid theories based on their dynamic transformations and it also searches for possible mutual enrichment of these theories/approaches as their examined similar character might be a good starting point for such goals. The nature of ethical values is questioned as well as the idea (supported by relevant argumentation) of not distinguishing ethical theories based on their implicit inclination towards usage of specific values. The paper confronts these traditional (classical) ideas of making such differentiation and thus strictly connecting specific moral values with specific ethical theories and not allowing possible productive associations. Ethics of social consequences and the theory of lesser evil are chosen as examples to prove that not limited approaches in terms of operation with only specific type of values might be productive. Their dynamic character predestines these theories to be hybrid ethical theories and thus compatible in their value structure and theory of right.

References

DUFF, R. A. (2001): Punishment, communication and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195104295.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FOOT, P. (1988): Utilitarianism and the virtues. In: S. Scheffler (ed.): Consequentialism and its critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 224–242.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GARRARD, E. (2005): The lesser evil: Political ethics in an age of terror. In: Democratiya, 1(2) [online] [Retrieved September 18 2015] Available at: http://www.dissentmagazine.org/democratiya_article/the-lesser-evil-political-ethics-in-an-age-of-terror
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (1994): Angažovanosť, solidarita, zodpovednosť [Commitment, solidarity, responsibility]. Prešov: Universum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (2012a): Ethics of social consequences – Methodology of bioethics education. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 2(1–2), pp. 16–27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (2008): Etika a reflexie morálky [Ethics and reflections of morality]. Prešov: FF PU.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (1996): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov a jej kontexty [Ethics of social consequences and its contexts]. Prešov: PVT.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (1999a): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov v kontextoch jej kritiky [Ethics of social consequences in context of its criticism]. Prešov: LIM.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (2005): Miesto humánnosti v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [A place of humanity in ethics of social consequences]. In: Filozofia, 60(8), pp. 613–623.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (2014): Profesijná etika ako etika práce a etika vzťahov [Professional ethics as work ethics and ethics of relationships]. Prešov: FF PU.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (2012b): Profesijná etika v kontexte konzekvencialistického uvažovania (ESD model profesijnej etiky) [Professional ethics in context of consequentialism (ESC model of professional ethics)] In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Profesijná etika – minulosť a prítomnosť [Professional ethics – past and present]. Prešov: FF PU, pp. 42–65.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GLUCHMAN, V. (1999b): Vývoj a postavenie humánnosti v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [Development and place of humanity in ethics of social consequences]. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Reflexie o humánnosti a etike [Reflections on humanity and ethics]. Prešov: LIM, pp. 48–59.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
IGNATIEFF, M. (2005): The lesser evil: Political ethics in an age of terror. Toronto: Penguin Canada.10.1515/9781400850686
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2013a): Ethics of social consequences as contemporary ethical theory. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 3(3–4), pp. 159–171.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2013b): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov ako forma neutilitaristického konzekvencializmu [Ethics of social consequences as a form of non-utilitarian consequentialism]. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Etika na Slovensku v súčasnosti (od 2. polovice 20. storočia). Prešov: FF PU, pp. 135–149.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2016): Hybridné tendencie v kontexte normatívnych koncepcií na príklade etiky sociálnych dôsledkov [Hybrid tendencies in normative conceptions with ethics of social consequences as an example]. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): 16. medzinárodná konferencia ETPP 2016/16 [16th International conference (ETPP 2016/16)]. Prešov: FF PU (forthcoming).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MILNE, A. J. M. (1986): Human rights and human diversity: An essay in the philosophy of human rights. New York: State university of New York.10.1007/978-1-349-08428-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MOORE, G.E. (2005): Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PETTIT, P. (1989): Consequentialism and respect for person. In: Ethics, 100(1), pp. 116–126.10.1086/293149
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PETTIT, P. (1991): Consequentialism. In. P. Singer (ed.): A companion to ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 230–241.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SAGEV, R. (2005): Review of Michael Ignatieff, The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. In: Ethics, 115(4), pp. 821–824.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SCHEFFLER, S. (1991): Introduction. In: S. Scheffler (ed.): Consequentialism and its critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. i–xx.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ŠVAŇA, L. (2016): Charlie Hebdo attacks in the light of Aquinas’ doctrine of double effect and Ignatieff’s lesser evil theory. In: Human Affairs, 26(1), pp. 63–72.10.1515/humaff-2016-0008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VAHABZADEH, P. (2005): The Secular Good in Denial: The Lesser Evil and the Politics of Fright. In: Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory, 6(2), pp. 117–129, [online] [Retrieved September 20 2016] Available at: http://www.jcrt.org/archives/06.2/vahabzadeh.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WILLIAMS, B. (1973): A Critique of Utilitarianism. In: J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams: Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–150.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

On two modern hybrid forms of consequentialism

Abstract

Paradigm

My account