Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Qualification Requirements for Foreign Suppliers in Public Procurement – Evidence from the Czech Republic Cover

Qualification Requirements for Foreign Suppliers in Public Procurement – Evidence from the Czech Republic

Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. Allain, Y. (2006). New European Directives on Public Procurement: Change or Continuity., 35(3), 517–536.
  2. Amann, M., Essig, M. (2015). Public procurement of innovation: empirical evidence from EU public authorities on barriers for the promotion of innovation., 28(3), 282–292.
  3. Arrowsmith, S. (2011).(3. ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  4. Bergman, M. A. and Lundberg, S. 2013. Tender evaluation and supplier selection methods in public procurement., 19(2), 73–83.
  5. Bovis, C. (2006). The New Public Procurement Legal Framework., 12(1), 73–109.
  6. Bovis H. Ch. (2007).. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Csorba, C. (2013). Čím se řídí prokazování kvalifikace dodavatelů z EU v zadávacím řízení., 21(1), 64–65.
  8. Dale-Clough, L. (2015). Public procurement of innovation and local authority procurement: procurement modes and framework conditions in three European cities., 28(3), 220–242.
  9. Davis, P., Brady, O. (2015). Are government intentions for the inclusion of innovation and small and medium enterprises participation in public procurement being delivered or ignored? An Irish case study., 28(3), 324–343.
  10. European Commission. (2011).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from:.
  11. Flynn, A., McKevitt, D., Davis, P. (2015). The impact of size on small and medium-sized enterprise public sector tendering., 33(4), 443–461.
  12. Graells, A. S. (2011).. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd.
  13. Grandia, J., Steijn, B., Kuipers, B. (2015). It is not easy being green: increasing sustainable public procurement behaviour., 28(3), 243–260.
  14. Guccio, C., Pignatoro, G. and Rizzo, I. (2014). Evaluating the efficiency of public procurement contracts for cultural heritage conservation works in Italy: examining the use of locality in public procurement., 38(1), 43–70.
  15. Journal of the European Union. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from EUR-Lex [Legal Information System].
  16. Jurčík, R. (2007).. Praha: C. H. Beck.
  17. Jurčík, R. (2012).(3. Ed.). Praha: C. H. Beck.
  18. Kruták T., Krutáková, L. (2013).. Praha: ANAG.
  19. Loader, K., Norton, S. (2015). SME access to public procurement: An analysis of the experiences of SMEs supplying the publicly funded UK heritage sector., 21(4), 241–250.
  20. Moretti, L., Valbonesi, P. (2015). Firms’ Qualifications and Subcontracting in Public Procurement: An Empirical Investigation., 31(3), 568–598.
  21. Ochrana, F. (2008).. Praha: Ekopress.
  22. Official Journal of the European Union. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from EUR-Lex [Legal Information System].
  23. Official Journal of the European Union. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from EURLex [Legal Information System].
  24. Official Journal of the European Union. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from EUR-Lex [Legal Information System].
  25. Pavel, J. (2007).. Praha: Nakladatelství Oeconomica.
  26. Raus, D. (2011).. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.
  27. Raus, D., Neruda, R. (2007).. Praha: Linde.
  28. Ross, T. W., Yan, J. (2015). Comparing Public – Private Partnerships and Traditional Public Procurement: Efficiency vs. Flexibility., 17(5), 448–466.
  29. Siemiatycki, M. (2015). Public – Private Partnerships in Canada: Reflections on twenty years of practice., 58(3), 343–362.
  30. Sinani, B., Shanto K. (2013). Methods and Functions of Comparative Law., 9(2), 25–40.
  31. Suliantoro, H., Ghozali, I., Wibowo, M. A. (2015). E-Procurement adoption in government institution: Predicting social values effect on intention and usage behaviour of e-procurement., 16(2), 167–184.
  32. Šebesta, M., Podešva, V., Olík, M. and Machurek, T. (2006).. Praha: ASPI.
  33. Testa, F., Annunziata, E., Iraldo, F., Frey, M. (2016). Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: an effective tool for sustainable production., 112, 1893–1900.
  34. The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from.
  35. The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from.
  36. The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from:.
  37. The Ministry Of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from.
  38. The Office Of The Protection Of Competition. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from.
  39. The Office Of The Protection Of Competition. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from.
  40. Wolters Kluwer ČR, a.s. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from ASPI [Legal Information System].
  41. Wolters Kluwer ČR, a.s. (2015).. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from ASPI [Legal Information System].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746 (formerly 1804-8285)
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 39
Published on: Apr 9, 2016
Published by: European Research University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Martin Vyklický, Petr Man, Rudolf Franz Heidu, Radek Jurčík, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.