References
- Abbasi, M.S., Tarhini, A., Elyas, T., and Shah, F. (2015). Impact of individualism and collectivism over the individual’s technology acceptance behaviour: a multi-group analysis between Pakistan and Turkey. J. Enterprise Inf. Manag. 28: 747–768, https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2014-0124.
- Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, https://typeset.io/papers/understanding-attitudes-and-predicting-social-behavior-4r28v9j5it.
- Al-Adwan, A., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G., Albelbisi, N., and Habibi, A. (2023). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28: 15381–15413, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3.
- Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L.M., and Al-Saht, G.R. (2020). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Educ. Dev. Stud. 11: 380–400, https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131.
- Alfadda, H. and Mahdi, H. (2021). Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). J. Psycholinguist. Res. 50: 883–900, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1.
- Alier, M., Casañ, G., Maria, J., Amo, D., Severance, C., and Fonseca, D. (2021). Privacy and E-learning: A pending task. Sustainability 13: 9206, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169206.
- Almekhled, B. and Petrie, H. (2024). Security and privacy in online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences and concerns of academics in Saudi higher education. J. Innovative Digital Transform. 1: 85–100, https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDT-10-2023-0040.
- Al-Samarraie, H. (2019). A scoping review of videoconferencing systems in higher education: learning paradigms, opportunities, and challenges. Int. Rev. Res. Open and Distr. Learning 20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4037.
- Alsayer, A. (2023). Social factors that facilitate the online collaborative activities of global distributed teams. In: Proceedings of the European conference on education. London, https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/conference-proceedings/ECE/ECE2023_proceedings.pdf.
- Alsayer, A., Templin, J., Niileksela, C., and Frey, B.B. (2024). Examining the structure of the revised community of inquiry framework: a multi-level approach. Educ. Inf. Technol. 30: 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13090-3.
- Andel, S.A., de Vreede, T., Spector, P.E., Balaji, P., Singh, V.K., and De Vreede, G.-J. (2020). Do social features help in video-centric online learning platforms? A social presence perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 113: 106505, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106505.
- Arribathi, A.H., Rahmawati, F.A., Supriyono, I.A., Santoso, N.A., and Audiah, S. (2024). Evaluating gamified platform for enhancing Arabic language proficiency using TAM. Int. Conf. Commun. Inf. Technol. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT62134.2024.10701098.
- Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., and Almusharraf, A. (2022). Video conferencing in the e-learning context: explaining learning outcome with the technology acceptance model. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27: 7679–7698, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1.
- Bedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., and Händel, M. (2021). Generation invisible? Higher education students’(non) use of webcams in synchronous online learning. Int. J. Educ. Res. Open 2, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100068.
- Belt, E.S. and Lowenthal, P.R. (2023). Synchronous video-based communication and online learning: an exploration of instructors’ perceptions and experiences. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28: 4941–4964, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11360-6.
- Bonett, D.G. and Wright, T.A. (2014). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. J. Organ. Behav. 36: 3–15, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960.
- Camilleri, M. and Camilleri, A. (2022). The acceptance of learning management systems and video conferencing technologies: lessons learned from COVID-19. Technol., Knowl. Learn. 27: 1311–1333, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09561-y.
- Cao, C. (2024). Acceptability of digital storytelling in language and literature education: an inquiry based on teacher and student approval. J. Educ., Humanit. Soc. Sci. 32: 61–66, https://doi.org/10.54097/DZ7P6Z31.
- Castelli, F.R. and Savary, M.A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Academia Pract. Ecol. Evolution 11: 3565–3576, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123.
- Correia, A.-P., Liu, C., and Xu, F. (2020). Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience. Dist. Educ. 41: 429–452, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821607.
- Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13: 319–340, https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
- Dorfman, P.W. and Howell, J.P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Adv. Int. Compar. Manage. 3: 127–150.
- Francescucci, A. and Rohani, L. (2018). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: the impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. J. Market. Educ. 41: 60–69, https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318818864.
- Gherhes, V., Simon, S., and Para, L. (2021). Analysing students’ reasons for keeping their webcams on or off during online classes. Sustainability 13: 3203, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063203.
- Granić, A. and Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: a systematic literature review. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50: 2572–2593, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864.
- Hair, J.FJr., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L., and Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivariate Data Anal. 1: 107–123, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624.
- Hair, J.J., Hair, J.F.Jr., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., and Gudergan, S.P. (2023). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications, California.
- Hamid, M., Sahrir, M.S., Amiruddin, A.Z., Yahaya, M.F., and Sha’ari, S.H. (2024). Evaluating student acceptance of interactive infographics module for Arabic grammar learning using the technology acceptance model (TAM). Int. J. Learn., Teach. Educ. Res. 23: 121–140, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.7.
- Händel, M., Bedenlier, S., Kopp, B., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., and Ziegler, A. (2022). The webcam and student engagement in synchronous online learning: visually or verbally? Educ. Inf. Technol. 27: 10405–10428, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11050-3.
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. Int. Stud. Manag. Org. 4: 15–41, https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300.
- Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: the hofstede model in context. Online Read. Psychol. Culture 2: 8, https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
- Huang, F., Teo, T., and Zhou, M. (2019). Factors affecting Chinese English as a foreign language teachers’ technology acceptance: a qualitative study. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 57: 83–105, https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746168.
- Jeffy, J., Alshare, K., and Lane, P. (2022). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in technology acceptance models: a meta-analysis. Univers. Access in the Inf. Soc. 23: 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00930-7.
- Jiang, B., Xinya, L., Sijiang, L., Chuanyan, H., Gangyao, Z., and Qiaomin, L. (2022). Experience of online learning from COVID-19: preparing for the future of digital transformation in education. (P. B. Tchounwou, J. F. Gavira, E. L. Meneses, & C. T. Fernández, Eds.). Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 19: 16787. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416787.
- Jimemez, L.C.G., Garcia, L.C.C, Violante, M.G, Macolin, F., and Vezzetti, E. (2020). Commonly used external TAM variables in e-Learning, agriculture and virtual reality applications. Fut. Internet 13: 7, https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13010007.
- Karl, K.A., Peluchette, J.V., and Aghakhani, N. (2021). Virtual work meetings during the covid-19 pandemic: the good, bad, and ugly. Small Group Res. 53: 343–365, https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211015286.
- Kianinezhad, N. (2024). EFL teachers’’ attitudes toward online teaching (ATOT): a theoritical review. Pedagogical Perspect. 3: 71–80, https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.53.
- Kirbas, O. and Dogan, F. (2023). Modeling development and validation of metaverse attitude scale. Int. J. Technol. Educ. 6: 155–186, https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.363.
- Koç, Ö., Yüksel, G., and Altun, E. (2021). Technology acceptance and usage behaviour of content and language integrated learning teachers in Turkey. Engl. Lang. Teach. Educ. J. 4: 113–124, https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i2.4269.
- Kozar, O. (2016). Teachers’ reaction to silence and teachers’ wait time in video and audioconferencing English lessons: do webcams make a difference? System 62: 53–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.002.
- Lee, C. and Wan, G. (2010). Including subjective norm and technology trust in the technology acceptance model. ACM SIGMIS Database (ACM Digital Library) 41: 40–51, https://doi.org/10.1145/1899639.1899642.
- Lenkaitis, C.A. (2020). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 33: 483–509, https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572018.
- Li, J., Wong, S., Yang, X., and Bell, A. (2020). Using feedback to promote student participation in online learning programs: evidence from a quasi-experimental study. Educ. Technol. Res. Development 68: 485–510, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09709-9.
- Lin, X. and Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian J. Distance Educ. 15: 169–179.
- Lorenzo, C.-M., Lezcano, L., and Salvador, S.-A. (2013). Language learning in educational virtual worlds – a TAM based assessment. JUCS – J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 19: 1615–1637, https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-019-11-1615.
- Luo, R., Wang, J., and Wang, Y. (2023). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of using videoconferencing for EFL learning: evidence from tencent meeting application. Heliyon 9: 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22993.
- Lyu, T., Keying, L., and Xiao, X. (2024). Exploring Second Language Learners’ Continuance Intention: Perceived Ease of Use as a Predictor via Serial Multiple Mediation Involving Perceived Usefulness and Flow in Language Learning Applications. In: Proceedings of the 2024 10th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies, 63–69, https://doi.org/10.1145/3661904.3661905.
- Majeed, M., Ghani, U., and Meng, W. (2022). Privacy concerns and online learning of postgraduate students through the lens of stimulus–organism–response model. Sustainability 14: 11604, https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811604.
- Marangunić, N. and Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univers. Access in the Inf. Soc. 14: 81–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
- Martin, F., Sun, T., and Westine, C.D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Comput. Educ. 159: 104009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009.
- Meishar-Tal, H. and Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2022). “Now you see me, now you don’t”: Wwy students avoid turning on their cameras in synchronous online lessons? Interact. Learn. Environ.: 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2127778.
- Munoz, K., Wang, M.-J., and Tham, A. (2021). Enhancing online learning environments using social presence: evidence from hospitality online courses during COVID-19. J. Teach. Trav. Tourism 21: 339–357, https://doi.org/10.1080/153.
- Mutammimah, H., Rejeki, S., Kustini, S., and Amelia, R. (2024). Understanding teachers’ perspective toward ChatGPT acceptance in English language teaching. Int. J. Technol. Educ. 7: 290–307, https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.656.
- Nguyen, K.L., My Hanh Le, T., Ngoc Mai Duong, T., Son Nguyen, T., Thu Hien Le, T., and Thanh Huong Nguyen, T. (2022). Assessing student’s adoption of E-learning: an integration of TAM and TPB framework. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 21: 297–335, https://www.informingscience.org/Publications/5000.
- Quintana, R. (2023). Embracing complexity in social science research. Qual. Quantity 57: 15–38, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01349-1.
- Racheva, V. (2018). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2048, p. Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082050.
- Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., and Becker, J.-M. (2024). “SmartPLS 4.” Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., and Hair, J.F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handb. Market Res.: 587–632, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15.
- Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., and Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): a meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Comput. Educ. 128: 13–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.
- Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ž., Valantinaitė, I., and Asakavičiūtė, V. (2022). Should I turn on my video camera?’The students’ perceptions of the use of video cameras in synchronous distant learning. Electronics 11: 813, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050813.
- Shahid, R., Iqbal, S., and Afzal, A. (2024). The impact of digital tools and online learning platforms on higher education learning outcomes. Al-Mahdi Res. J. (MRJ) 5.
- Singh, V. and Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). Am. J. Dist. Educ. 33: 289–306, https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.16630.
- Slimi, Z. (2020). Online learning and teaching during COVID-19: a case study from Oman. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Studies 4: 44–56, https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no1a17.
- Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., and Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interact. Learn. Environ. 25: 306–328, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635.
- Telles, J.A. (2010). Do we really need a webcam? The uses that foreign language students make out of webcam images during teletandem sessions. Rev. Let. Let. 25: 65–79.
- Tobi, B., Osman, W.H., Baker, A., and Othman, I.W. (2021). A case study on students’ reasons for not switching on their cameras during online class sessions. Int. J. Educ., Psychol. Cousell. 6: 216–224, https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.641016.
- Ulutaş, K.N. and Ölmez, R. (2021). The role of technology acceptance model in constructing unbounded learning environments for second language learners. In: Handbook of research on developing a post-pandemic paradigm for virtual technologies in higher education. IGI Global, United States, pp. 282–298.
- Vallespin, B. and Prasetyo, Y.T. (2022). Posture analysis of students doing online class at home during COVID-19 pandemic. In: IEEE 7th international conference on engineering technologies and applied sciences (ICETAS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2020. pp. 1–6.
- Venturini, S. and Mehmetoglu, M. (2019). Plssem: a stata package for structural equation modeling with partial least squares. J. Stat. Software 88: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v000.i00.
- Viberg, O., Kizilcec, R.F., Jivet, I., Monés, A.M., and Oh, A. (2023). Cultural Differences in Students’ Privacy Concerns in Learning Analytics across Germany, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the United States. arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2312.02093.
- Wut, T.-M., Lee, S.W., and Xu, J. (2022). How do facilitating conditions influence student-to-student interaction within an online learning platform? A new typology of the serial mediation model. Educ. Sci. 12: 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050337.
- Yang, Y., Sun, H., Chai, Z., Jiang, G., and Estigoy, E. (2024). Usefulness, ease-of-use, and acceptance towards generative AI in language learning of non-language majors: a TAM-based study. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 11: 1–10, https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.116.1.
- Zhang, P., Aikman, S.N., and Sun, H. (2008). Two types of attitudes in ICT acceptance and use. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 7: 628–648, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802335482.
- Zhang, Y., Zheng, B., and Tian, Y. (2022). An exploratory study of English-language learners’ text chat interaction in synchronous computer-mediated communication: functions and change over time. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 37: 1975–2006, https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2136202.
- Zhang, D., Hennessy, S., and Pérez-Paredes, P. (2023). An investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ acceptance of mobile dictionaries in English language learning. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 13: 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2189915.