Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Learners’ Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium at Submicroscopic, Macroscopic and Symbolic Levels Cover

Learners’ Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium at Submicroscopic, Macroscopic and Symbolic Levels

Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology
Volume 23 (2018): Issue 1-2 (December 2018)
By: Miroslav Prokša,  Anna Drozdíková and  Zuzana Haláková  
Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. [1] Nakhleh MB, Mitchell RC. Concept learning versus problem solving there is a difference. J Chem Educ. 1993;70(3):190-192. DOI: 10.1021/ed070p190.10.1021/ed070p190
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Nurrenbern SC, Pickering M. Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference? J Chem Educ. 1987;64(6):508. DOI: 10.1021/ed064p508.10.1021/ed064p508
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Tsaparlis G, Papaphotis G. High-school students’ conceptual difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. Int J Sci Educ. 2009;31(7):895-930. DOI: 10.1080/09500690801891908.10.1080/09500690801891908
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Luxford CJ, Bretz SL. Development of the bonding representations inventory to identify student misconceptions about covalent and ionic bonding representations. J Chem Educ. 2014;91(3):312-320. DOI: 10.1021/ed400700q.10.1021/ed400700q
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Nakhleh MB, Samarapungavan A. Elementary school children’s beliefs about mater. J Res Sci Teach. 1999;36(7):777-805; DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<;777::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-Z.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<;777::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-Z
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Hinton ME, Nakhleh MB. Students’ microscopic, macroscopic, and symbolic representations of chemical reactions. Chem Educator. 1999;4(5):158-167. DOI: 10.1007/s0089799032.10.1007/s0089799032
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Ghirardi M, Marchetti F, Regis CAR, Roletto E. Implementing an equilibrium law teaching sequence for secondary school students to learn chemical equilibrium. J Chem Educ. 2015;92(6):1008-1015. DOI: 10.1021/ed500658s.10.1021/ed500658s
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Őzmen H. Determination of students’ alternative conceptions about chemical equilibrium: a review of research and the case of Turkey. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2008;9(3):225-233: DOI: 10.1039/b812411f.10.1039/b812411f
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Garnett PJ, Garnett PJ, Hackling MW. Students’ alternative conceptions in chemistry: a review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies Sci Educat. 1995;25(1):69-95. DOI: 10.1080/03057269508560050.10.1080/03057269508560050
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Solomonidou C, Stavridou H. Design and development of a computer learning environment on the basis of students’ initial conceptions and learning difficulties about chemical equilibrium. Educat Infor Technol. 2001;6(1):5-2. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011359010331.10.1023/A:1011359010331
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Quilez-Pardo J, Solaz-Portoles JJ. Students’ and teachers’ misapplication of the Le Chatelier’s principle: implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium. J Res Sci Teach. 1995;32(9):939-957. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660320906.10.1002/tea.3660320906
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Pedrosa MA, Dias MH. Chemistry textbook approaches to chemical equilibrium and student alternative conceptions. Chem Educ Res Pract Eur. 2000;1(2):227-236. DOI: 10.1039/A9RP90024A.10.1039/A9RP90024
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Voska KW, Heikkinen HW. Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. J Res Sci Teach. 2000;37(2):160-176. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<;160::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-M.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<;160::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Bilgin I, Uzuntiryaki E, Geban Ö. Students’ misconceptions on the concept of chemical equilibrium. Educat Sci. 2003;28(127):10-17.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Niaz M. Response contradiction: conflict resolution strategies used by students in solving problems of chemical equilibrium. J Sci Educ Technol. 2001;10(2):205-211. DOI: 10.1023/A:100948141.10.1023/A:100948141
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Banerjee AC. Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. Int J Sci Educ. 1991;13(4):487-494. DOI: 10.1080/0950069910130411.10.1080/0950069910130411
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Hackling MW, Garnett PJ. Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. Eur J Sci Educ. 1985;7(2):205-214. DOI: 10.1080/0140528850070211.10.1080/0140528850070211
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Mulford DR. An Inventory for Measuring College Students’ Level of Misconceptions in First Semester Chemistry. Master of Science Thesis. Purdue University, 1996. Major Professor: William R. Robinson.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Treagust DF. Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. Int J Sci Educ. 1988;10(2):159-169. DOI: 10.1080/0950069880100204.10.1080/0950069880100204
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Kirbulut YD, Geban O. Using three-tier diagnostic test to assess students’ misconceptions of states of matter. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Educ. 2014;10(5):509-521. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a.10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Hestenes D, Wells M, Swackhamer G. Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher. 1992;30(3):141-166. DOI: 10.1119/1.2343497.10.1119/1.2343497
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] D’Avanzo C. Biology concept inventories: Overview, status, and next steps. BioSci. 2008;58(11):1079-1085. DOI: 10.1641/b581111.10.1641/b581111
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Farand P, Tavares JR. A concept inventory for knowledge base evaluation and continuous curriculum improvement. Educat Chem Eng. 2017;21:33-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.ece.2017.07.0011749-7728.10.1016/j.ece.2017.07.0011749-7728
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cdem-2018-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4506 | Journal ISSN: 1640-9019
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 111
Published on: Jan 25, 2019
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
chemical equilibrium,
equilibrium constant,
chemical triangle,
level of comprehension
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Chemistry, other

© 2019 Miroslav Prokša, Anna Drozdíková, Zuzana Haláková, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2018): Issue 1-2 (December 2018)Next article