Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting – a Stakeholder’s Perspective Approach

Litfin, Thorsten; Meeh-Bunse, Gunther; Luer, Katja; Teckert, Özlem

doi:10.1515/bsrj-2017-0003

Abstract

Background: International financial reporting standards have constantly been facing fast-growing significant development. This has mainly been driven by the aim of better serving the needs of the investors. Awareness that corporate financial reporting provides short-sighted information and measures has been rising among politicians, in the society and on the financial markets. Therefore, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting as a form of non-financial reporting has made it to limelight. Various reporting types developed, but the type of reporting is hardly codified. Objective: The goal of this paper is to identify the superior CSR reporting type from a stakeholder’s perspective. After identifying and analyzing central guidelines on CSR reporting and presenting different approaches, the authors will apply a positive-empirical methodology. Methods/Approach: In this first innovative joint attempt, eye-tracking technology is combined with a questionnaire for approaching CSR quality. Results: This study demonstrates the validity of the used methodology for the analysis of search and information browsing behavior in various types of sustainability reports. Conclusions: Overall our findings indicate that the reporting type "reference sustainability report" may not be advisable from a stakeholder’s perspective.

References

1. Carlowitz, H. C. (1713). „Sylvicultura Oeconomica, oder hauswirthliche Nachricht und naturmässige Anweisung zur wilden Baumzucht”, Leipzig, Johann Friedrich Braun.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Commission of the European Communities (2001), „GREEN PAPER: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility”, available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-01-9_en.pdf (22 April 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Duchowski, Andrew T. (2002), „A breath-first survey of eye-tracking applications”, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 455-470.10.3758/BF03195475
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Duchowski, Andrew T. (2007). „Eye Tracking Methodology-Theory and Practice”, London, Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., Rogers, J., Serafeim, G. (2012), „The Need for Sector- Specific Materiality and Sustainability Reporting Standards“, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 65-71.10.1111/j.1745-6622.2012.00380.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., Krzus, M. P. (2011), „Market Interest in Nonfinancial Information“, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 113-127.10.1111/j.1745-6622.2011.00357.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Eisl, C., Losbichler, H., Falschlunger, L., Grabmann, E., Hofer, D. (2015), „Information Design in Company Report of Dax 30-Companies: An Empirical Investigation of University of Applied Sciences Oberösterreich and of KPMG“, available at: https://www.kpmg.com/DE/de/Documents/information-designgeschaeftsberichte-dax-30-unternehmen-2015-kpmg.pdf (26 April 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. European Union (1997), „Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts”, available at: http://europa.eu/eu-law/decisionmaking/treaties/pdf/treaty_of_amsterdam/treaty_of_amsterdam_en.pdf (22 April 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Gebauer, J., Westermann, U. (2012), „IÖW/future Ranking of Sustainability Reports of German Small and Medium Sized Companies: Results and Trends”, available at: http://www.rankingnachhaltigkeitsberichte.de/data/ranking/user_upload/pdf/IOEW-future-Ranking_2011_KMU_Ergebnisbericht.pdf (26 April 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Geise, S. (2011), „ Eyetracking in Communication and Media Studies: Theory, Method and Critical Reflection “, Studies in Communication Media, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 149-263.10.5771/2192-4007-2011-2-149
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Global Reporting Initiative (2015), „G4 Leitlinien zur Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung, Berichterstattungsgrundsätze und Standardangaben“, Amsterdam.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Hahn, R., Kühnen, M. (2013), „Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory and opportunities in an expanding field of research”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 59, pp. 5-21.10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Köppl, P., Neureiter, M. (Eds.) (2004), „Corporate Social Responsibility - Leitlinien und Konzepte im Management der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen“, Linde, Vienna.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Kolk, A. (2010), „Trajectories of Sustainability Reporting by MNCs”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 367-374.10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Leven, W. (1991). „Blickverhalten von Konsumenten. Grundlagen, Messung und Anwendung in der Werbeforschung“, Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-52390-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Litfin, T., Meeh-Bunse, G. Luer, K., Teckert, Ö. (2016), „Perception of sustainability reporting: an attempt by means of eye-tracking, in Mirjana Pejic Bach et al., (Eds.), Proceedings of the Entrenova - Enterprise Research Innovation Conference, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 344-351.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (2016a), “Information for users”, available at: http://www.deutscher-nachhaltigkeitskodex.de/en/application/information-forusers.html (22 April 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (2016b), „Glossar - Umwelt“, available at: http://www.deutschernachhaltigkeitskodex.de/de/anwendung/glossar.html?tx_smileglossary_pi1[word ]=64 (31 October 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Sailer, U. (2015), „Sustainable Development - an Introduction", in: Ernst, D., Sailer, U. (Eds.) (2015): Sustainable Business Management, UVK, Constance/Munich, pp. 23-29.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Schub von Bossiazky, G. (1992). „Psychologische Marketingforschung“, Vahlen, München.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. United Nations (1987), „Our common Future”, available at: http://www.undocuments.net/ocf-02.htm (22 April 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. United Nations (2016), „What is UN Global Compact?”, available at: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc (22 April 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. United Nations (1992), „Agenda 21", available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (22 April 2016)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). „Eye Movements and Visions”, New York, Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting – a Stakeholder’s Perspective Approach

Abstract

Paradigm

My account