Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Has the Action for Failure to Act in the European Union Lost its Purpose? Cover

Has the Action for Failure to Act in the European Union Lost its Purpose?

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Volume 7 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
By: Inga Daukšienė and  Arvydas Budnikas  
Open Access
|Mar 2015

References

  1. 1. Biber, Eric. “Two Sides of the Same Coin: Judicial Review of Administrative Agency Action and Inaction.” Virginia Environmental Law Journal No. 26 (2008): 462 - 504.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Due, Ole. “Legal Remedies for the Failure of European Community Institutions to Act in Conformity with EEC Treaty Provisions.” Fordham International Law Journal No. 14 (1990): 341-358.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Hartley, Trevor. The Foundations of European Union Law. 8th edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/he/9780199681457.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Lang, John T., and Colin Raftery. “Remedies for the Commission’s Failure to Act in ‘Comitology’ Cases.” European Law Review No. 36 (2011): 264-275.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Laule, Gerhard. “Action for Failure to Act in State Aid Cases: Case T-95/96, Gestevision Telecinco SA v. Commission of the European Communities, Judgment of 15 September 1998.” Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa No. 32 (1999): 376-385.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Lenaerts, Koen, Ignace Maselis, and Kathleen Gutman. EU Procedural Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Reimann, Mathias, and Joachim Zekoll. Introduction to German Law. Hague: Kluwer law international, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Schermers, Henry, and Denis Waelbroeck. Judicial Protection in the European Union. 6th edition. Kluwer Law International, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Schwarze, Jürgen. European Administrative Law. Revised 1st edition. London: Sweet&Maxwell, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Smit, Hans, and Peter Herzog. The Law of the European Communities: A Commentary on the EC Treaty. New York: Matthew and Bender, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Steiner, Josephine, Lorna Woods, and Philippa Watson. EU Law. 12th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 1. Ainsworth v. European Commission and European Council. European Union Court of Justice, 1987, no. 271/83.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 2. Air France v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 1994, no. T-3/93.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 3. Alfastar Benelux SA v. European Council II. European Union General Court, 2013, no. T‑274/12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 4. Alfons Lütticke v. European Commission. General advocate Gand of CJEU, 1966, no. 48/65.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 5. Asia Motor France v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 1992, no. T-28/90.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 6. Asklepios v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 2007, no. T‑167/04.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 7. Bayer CropScience v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 2005, no. T‑34/05R.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 8. Bergbau v. High authority. European Union Court of Justice, 1960, no. 41/59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 9. Borromeo v. European Commission. General advocate Gand in CJEU, 1970, no. 6/70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 10. Branco v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 2000, no. T-194/97.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 11. Buckl v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1992, no. C-15/91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 12. Camera Care v. European Commission. General advocate Warner of CJEU, 1980, no. 792/79 R.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 13. Campsider v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1985, no. 25/85R.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 14. Cantine v. European Parliament. European Union General Court, 2000, no. T-103/99.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 15. CEVA v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 2003, no. T-344/00.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 16. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Gazette, 2008, no. C 115/47.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 17. Echebastar v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1993, no. C-25/91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 18. Echebastar v. European Commission. General advocate Gulmann in CJEU, 1992, no. C-25/91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 19. Elz v. High Authority. European Union Court of Justice, 1961, no. 22/60.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 20. ENU v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1993, no. C-107/91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 21. Eurocoton v. European Council. European Union General Court, 2000, no. T-213/97.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 22. European Commission v. European Council. European Union Court of Justice, 2014, no. C-377/12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 23. European Commission v. European Council. General advocate Yves Bot in CJEU, 2013, no. C‑63/12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 24. European Commission v. European Parliament and European Council. European Union Court of Justice, 2014, no. C-427/12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 25. European Commission v. Ryanair. European Union Court of Justice, 2013, no. C‑615/11P.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 26. European Parliament v. European Council. European Union Court of Justice, 1985, no. 13/83.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 27. European Parliament v. European Council. European Union Court of Justice, 2013, no. C‑196/12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 28. GEMA v. European Commission. General advocate Capotorti in CJEU, 1979, no. 125/78.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 29. Germany v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1984, no. 84/82.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 30. Goldstein v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 1998, no. T-286/97.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 31. Hake v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1970, no. 75/69.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 32. Irish Cement v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1998, no. C-166/86.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 33. Jogamar v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1999, no. C-249/99P.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 34. Kohler v. European Court of Auditors. European Union Court of Justice, 1984, no. 316/82.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 35. Law on Administrative Proceedings. Official Gazette, 1999, no. 8-1029.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 36. Magnus Killinger v. European Commission and European Parliament. European Union Court of Justice, 2005, no. C‑396/03.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 37. Meroni v. High authority. European Union Court of Justice, 1962, no. 21/61.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 38. National Carbonizing Company v. European Commission. General advocate Mayras in EUGC, 1976, no. 114/75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 39. NDSHT v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 2010, no. C‑322/09.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 40. Netherlands v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1971, no. C-59/70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 41. Nordgetreide v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1972, no. 42/71.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 42. Oficemen v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 1997, no. T-212/95.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. 43. Pioneer Hi-Bred v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 2013, No. T-164/10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. 44. Port v. Bundesanstalt. European Union Court of Justice, 1996, no. C-68/95.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. 45. Regulation Laying down Detailed Rules for the Application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Gazette, 1999, no. 659/1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. 46. Ryanair v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 2011, no. T‑442/07.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. 47. San Carlo v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1987, no. 95/86.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. 48. Sánchez v. European Commission and European Parliament. European Union General Court, 2010, no. T-61/10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. 49. Sateba v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 1997, no. T-83/97.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. 50. Sodima v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 2000, no. C-44/00P.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. 51. Steenkolemijnen v. High authority. European Union Court of Justice, 1959, no. C-17/57.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. 52. Tecnoprocess v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 2011, no. T-264/09.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. 53. TF1 v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 1999, no. T-17/96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. 54. Usinor v. European Commission. European Union Court of Justice, 1986, no. C-81/85.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. 55. Yusef v. European Commission. European Union General Court, 2014, no. T‑306/10.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2015-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 209 - 226
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2014
Accepted on: Dec 30, 2014
Published on: Mar 11, 2015
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Action for failure to act,
European Union,
article 265 TFEU,
judicial protection
Related subjects:
Law,
Law, other,
History, philosophy and sociology of law

© 2015 Inga Daukšienė, Arvydas Budnikas, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 7 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)