Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Artificial Intelligence and the GDPR: Inevitable Nemeses? Cover

Artificial Intelligence and the GDPR: Inevitable Nemeses?

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. AI HLEG (2019), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, Independent High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, European Commission.
  2. Boerding, A.; Culik, N.; Doepke, C.; Hoeren, T.; Juelicher, T.; Roettgen, C. & Schoenfeld, M. V. (2018), ‘Data ownership—a property rights approach from a European perspective,’ Journal of Civil Law Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 323–370.
  3. Butterworth, M. (2018), ‘The ICO and artificial intelligence: The role of fairness in the GDPR framework,’ Computer Law & Security, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.00410.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.004
  4. Casey, B.; Farhangi, A. & Vogl, R. (2019), ‘Rethinking explainable machines: The GDPR’s right to explanation debate and the rise of algorithmic audits in enterprise,’ Berkeley Technology Law Journal, vol. 34, pp. 143–188. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38M32N986
  5. Diakopoulos, N. & Friedler, S. (2016), ‘How to hold algorithms accountable,’ MIT Technology Review, 17 November. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602933/how-to-hold-algorithms-accountable/ [accessed Nov 2020]
  6. Etzioni, A. & Etzoni, O. (2016), ‘Keeping AI legal,’ Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 133–146. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.272661210.2139/ssrn.2726612
  7. EveryMac (n.d.), ‘Apple Macintosh Plus (ED) Specs.’ Retrieved from https://everymac.com/systems/apple/mac_classic/specs/mac_plus.html [accessed Nov 2020]
  8. Ferretti, A.; Schneider, M. & Blasimme, A. (2018), ‘Machine learning in medicine: opening the new data protection black box,’ European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 320–332. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2018/3/1010.21552/edpl/2018/3/10
  9. Gokey, M. (2020), ‘The best smart speaker you can buy: Amazon Echo vs. Google Home vs. Sonos One,’ Business Insider, 28 February. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/best-smart-speaker-amazon-echo [accessed Nov 2020]
  10. Google (2018), ‘Descending into ML: training and loss,’ Google Developers. Retrieved from https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/crash-course/descending-into-ml/training-and-loss [accessed Nov 2020]
  11. Government Office for Science (2015), Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Implications for the Future of Decision Making, London: Government Office for Science.
  12. Henley, J. & Booth, R. (2020), ‘Welfare surveillance system violates human rights, Dutch court rules,’ The Guardian, 5 February. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/05/welfare-surveillance-system-violates-human-rights-dutch-court-rules [accessed Nov 2020]
  13. Hu, S. (2019), ‘Detecting concealed information in text and speech,’ Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 402–412. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-103910.18653/v1/P19-1039
  14. Humerick, M. (2018), ‘Taking AI personally: How the E.U. must learn to balance the interests of personal data privacy & artificial intelligence,’ Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 393–418.
  15. ICO (2017), Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Protection, Wilmslow: Information Commissioner’s Office.
  16. Katyal, S. K. (2019), ‘Private accountability in the age of artificial intelligence,’ UCLA Law Review, vol. 66, pp. 54–141.
  17. Krakovsky, M. (2017), ‘Finally, a peek inside the ‘black box’ of machine learning systems,’ Stanford Engineering: Research & Ideas, 25 April. Retrieved from https://engineering.stanford.edu/magazine/article/finally-peek-inside-black-box-machine-learning-systems [accessed Nov 2020]
  18. Landau, D. M. (2016), ‘Artificial intelligence and machine learning: how computers learn,’ Intel iQ, 17 August. Retrieved from https://iq.intel.com/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning/ [accessed Nov 2020]
  19. Macuga, T. (2017), ‘What is deep learning and how does it work?’ Educational Resources, Australian Centre for Robotic Vision, 23 August. Retrieved from https://resources.rvhub.org/what-is-deep-learning-and-how-does-it-work/ [accessed Nov 2020]
  20. Marr, B. (2016a), ‘What is the difference between artificial intelligence and machine learning?’ Forbes, 6 December. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2016/12/06/what-is-the-difference-between-artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning/#b28d15f2742b [accessed Nov 2020]
  21. Marr, B. (2016b), ‘What is the difference between deep learning, machine learning and AI?’ Forbes, 8 December. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2016/12/08/what-is-the-difference-between-deep-learning-machine-learning-and-ai/#7eeda8f326cf [accessed Nov 2020]
  22. Mazur, J. (2018), ‘Right to access information as a collective-based approach to the GDPR’s right to explanation in European law,’ Erasmus Law Review, no. 3, pp. 178–189. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.00011610.5553/ELR.000116
  23. Pagallo, U. (2017), ‘The legal challenges of big data: putting secondary rules first in the field of EU data protection,’ European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36–46. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2017/1/710.21552/edpl/2017/1/7
  24. Pauwels, E. & Denton, S. W. (2018), ‘The internet of bodies: life and death in the age of AI,’ California Western Law Review, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 221–234.
  25. Prins, C. (2006), ‘When personal data, behavior and virtual identities become a commodity: would a property rights approach matter,’ SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology and Society, pp. 270–303. https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.030406.27010.2966/scrip.030406.270
  26. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L119/1, 4.5.2016.
  27. Ribeiro, M. T.; Singh, S. & Guestrin, C. (2016), ‘“Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier,’ Proceedings of KDD2016, 22nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 13–17, San Francisco, California. Retrieved from https://www.kdd.org/kdd2016/papers/files/rfp0573-ribeiroA.pdf [accessed Nov 2020] https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-302010.18653/v1/N16-3020
  28. Selbst, A. D. & Barocas, S. (2018), ‘The intuitive appeal of explainable machines,’ Fordham Law Review, vol. 87, pp. 1085–1140. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.312697110.2139/ssrn.3126971
  29. Smith, B. M.; McGuire, B.; Huang, T. & Yang, G. (2006), The History of Artificial Intelligence, University of Washington. Retrieved from https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/csep590/06au/projects/history-ai.pdf [accessed Nov 2020]
  30. Tashea, J. (2017), ‘Courts are using AI to sentence criminals. That must stop now,’ Wired, 17 April. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2017/04/courts-using-ai-sentence-criminals-must-stop-now/ [accessed Nov 2020]
  31. Temme, M. (2017), ‘Algorithms and transparency in view of the New General Data Protection Regulation,’ European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 3, pp. 473–485. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2017/4/910.21552/edpl/2017/4/9
  32. Tene, O. & Polonetsky, J. (2013), ‘Judged by the tin man: individual rights in the age of big data,’ Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 351–368.
  33. Tschider, C. A. (2018), ‘Regulating the internet of things: discrimination, privacy, and cybersecurity in the artificial intelligence age,’ Denver Law Review, vol. 96, pp. 87–144. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.312955710.2139/ssrn.3129557
  34. Tsesis, A. (2019), ‘Data subjects’ privacy rights: regulation of personal data retention and erasure,’ University of Colorado Law Review, vol. 90, pp. 593–630. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.332597310.2139/ssrn.3325973
  35. Van den Hoven van Genderen, R. (2017), ‘Privacy and data protection in the age of pervasive technologies in AI and robotics,’ European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 338–352. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2017/3/810.21552/edpl/2017/3/8
  36. Villaronga, E. F.; Kieseberg, P. & Li, T. (2018), ‘Humans forget, machines remember: artificial intelligence and the right to be forgotten,’ Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.08.00710.1016/j.clsr.2017.08.007
  37. Wachter, S. & Mittelstadt, B. (2019), ‘A right to reasonable inferences: re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI,’ Columbia Business Law Review, pp. 494–620. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/mu2kf10.31228/osf.io/mu2kf
  38. Zarsky, T. Z. (2017), ‘Incompatible: the GDPR in the age of big data,’ Seton Hall Review, vol. 47, pp. 995–1020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 90
Published on: Dec 24, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Aleksandr Kesa, Tanel Kerikmäe, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.