Keeping Safe Distance: Chapters from Randomised (Non)Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights before Polish Constitutional Tribunal

Kustra-Rogatka, Aleksandra; Hamuľák, Ondrej

doi:10.1515/bjes-2019-0038

Abstract

The question of the application and impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (‘Charter’) in quotidian practice of human rights protection and review is a strategic one. Given the predominantly decentralised effects of EU law and with the due account to the wide interpretation of the scope of the Charter’s application (Art. 51(1)) presented by the CJEU (C-617/10 Fransson), the national dimension of the application of the Charter forms the crucial issue for the functioning of the EU system of fundamental rights protection. The Charter itself has a big potential to influence the content, nature and mechanisms of the fundamental rights protection at the national level. The present paper focuses on this phenomena in connection to the case-law, opinions and workload of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal (‘TK’). It analyses the approach of TK towards the Charter in abstract manner as well as the (non)appearance of the Charter in the reasoning of the court in concrete cases. The article reports on the main cases and analyses the reasons of the aloof approach of the TK towards the EU human rights catalogue.

References

Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson [2013], CJEU C-617/10, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105, 26.2.2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Albi, A. & Bardutzky, S., eds. (2019), National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, The Rule of Law: National Reports, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-273-610.1007/978-94-6265-273-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Andras, J. (2017), ‘Application of the EU Charter by national courts in purely domestic cases,’ in A. Jakab & D. Kochenov (eds.) The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 252–264.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arnull, A. (2014), ‘Protocol (No 30) on the Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and the United Kingdom,’ in S. Peers, T. Harvey, J. Kenner & A. Ward (eds.) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A Commentary, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 1596–1597. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845259055_163810.5771/9783845259055_1638
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas [2018], CJEU C-64/16, ECLI: EU:C:2018:117, 27.2.2018, para 34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barnard, C. (2008), ‘The ‘opt-out’ for the UK and Poland from the Charter of Fundamental Rights: triumph of rhetoric over reality?’ in S. Griller & J. Ziller (eds.) The Lisbon Treaty. EU Constitutionalism without Constitutional Treaty, Wien & New York: Springer, pp. 257–283.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Belling, V. (2012), ‘Supranational fundamental rights or primacy of sovereignty? Legal effects of the so-called opt-out from the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights,’ European Law Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00596.x10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00596.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Biernat, S. & Kawczyńska, M. (2019), ‘The role of the Polish Constitution (pre-2016): development of a liberal democracy in the European and international context,’ in A. Albi & S. Bardutzky (eds.) National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law: National Reports, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 745–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-273-6_1610.1007/978-94-6265-273-6_16
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bobek, M. (2008), ‘Learning to talk: preliminary rulings, the courts of the new Member States and the Court of Justice,’ Common Market Law Review, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1611–1643.10.54648/COLA2008115
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bobek, M. (2012), ‘The impact of the European mandate of ordinary courts on the position of constitutional courts,’ in M. de Visser & C. Van De Heyning (eds.) Constitutional Conversations in Europe, Hague: Intersentia, pp. 287–308.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bobek, M. (2017), ‘The effects of EU law in the national legal systems,’ in C. Barnard & S. Peers (eds.) European Union Law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198789130.003.000610.1093/he/9780198789130.003.0006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bobek, M. & Kühn, Z. (2010), ‘What about that “incoming tide”? The application of the EU law in the Czech Republic,’ in A. Lazowski (ed.) The Application of EU Law in the New Member States: Brave New World, Hague: TMC Asser Press, pp. 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-429-5_1110.1007/978-90-6704-429-5_11
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret AS v. Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications and others [1996], CJEU C-84/95, ECLI:EU:C:1996:312, 30.7.1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burgorgue-Larsen, L., ed. (2017), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Seized by the National Judges, Paris: Pedone.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chronowski, N. (2018), Human Rights in a Multilevel Constitutional Area. Global, European and Hungarian Challenges, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Common Market Law Review (2013) Editorial Comments: ‘Ultra vires—has the Bundesverfassungsgericht shown its teeth?’ vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 925–929.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – PROTOCOLS – Protocol (no. 30) on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom, Document 12008E/PRO/30, OJ 115, 9.5.2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters,OJ L 44/2001, 1 as amended, 22.12.2000.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Council Regulation 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy, 20.12.2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Criminal proceedings against Ivo Taricco and Others [2015], CJEU C-105/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:555, 8.9.2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Criminal proceedings against M.A.S. and M.B. [2017], CJEU C-42/17, ECLI:EU:C:2017:936. 5.12.2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cserne, P. (2015), ‘Formalism in judicial reasoning: is Central and Eastern Europe a special case?’ in M. Bobek (ed.) Central European Judges Under the European Influence: The Transformative Power of the EU Revisited, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–42.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dani, M. (2017), ‘National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy: a reply to Jan Komárek,’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox05710.1093/icon/mox057
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
De Boer, N. (2013), ‘Addressing rights divergences under the Charter: Melloni,’ Common Market Law Review, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1083–1103.10.54648/COLA2013108
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deutscher, E. & Mair, S. (2017), ‘National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy: a reply to Jan Komárek,’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox06510.1093/icon/mox065
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Di Fabio, U. (2001), ‘A European Charter: towards a constitution for the Union,’ Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 7, pp. 159–172.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eeckhout, P. (2002), ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the federal question,’ Common Market Law Review, vol. 39, pp. 945–994. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102083260067410.1023/A:1020832600674
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elliniki Radiophonia Tiléorassi AE and Panellinia Omospondia Syllogon Prossopikou v. Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis and Sotirios Kouvelas and Nicolaos Avdellas and others [1991], CJEU C-260/89, ECLI:EU:C:1991:254, 18.6.1991.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fontanelli, F. (2014a), ‘The implementation of European Union law by Member States under Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights,’ Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 20, pp. 194–247.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fontanelli, F. (2014b), ‘National measures and the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights – does curia.eu know iura.eu?’ Human Rights Law Review, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 231–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu00910.1093/hrlr/ngu009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FRA EU (2018), Opinion - 4/2018 ‘Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights’. Retrieved from https://fra.europa.eu/en/opinion/2018/charter-training [accessed 20 Aug 2019]
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A. & Sadurski, W. (2016), ‘The law of ritual slaughter and the principle of religious equality,’ Journal of Law, Religion and State, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-0040300110.1163/22124810-00403001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Górski, M. (2013), ‘Skutek Karty Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskiej po wejściu w życie Traktatu z Lizbony w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka, Trybunału Konstytucyjnego Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej i Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej’ [The impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Poland and the Court of Justice of the European Union], in S. Dudzik & N. Półtorak (eds.) Prawo Unii Europejskiej a prawo konstytucyjne państw członkowskich [EU Law and the Constitutional Law of the Member States], Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, pp. 319–340.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hamuľák, O. (2016), National Sovereignty in the European Union –View from the Czech Perspective, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45351-410.1007/978-3-319-45351-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hamuľák, O. & Kerikmäe, T. (2016), ‘Indirect effect of EU law under constitutional scrutiny – the overview of approach of Czech Constitutional Court,’ International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/iclr-2016-000510.1515/iclr-2016-0005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hamuľák, O.; Kopal, D. & Kerikmäe, T. (2016), ‘Walking a tightrope – looking back on risky position of German Federal Constitutional Court in OMT preliminary question,’ European Studies: The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics, vol. 3, pp. 115–141.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hamuľák, O. & Mazák, J. (2017), ‘The charter of fundamental rights of the European Union vis-à-vis the Member States – scope of its application in the view of the CJEU,’ Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law, vol. 8, pp. 161–172.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hamuľák, O.; Sulyok, M. & Kiss, L. N. (2019), ‘Measuring the ‘EU’clidean distance between EU law and the Hungarian Constitutional Court – focusing on the position of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights,’ Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, vol. 10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hancox, E. (2013), ‘The meaning of “implementing” EU law under Article 51(1) of the Charter: Åkerberg Fransson,’ Common Market Law Review, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1411–1431.10.54648/COLA2013137
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hubert Wachauf v. Bundesamt für Ernährung und Forstwirtschaft [2013], CJEU 5/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:321, 13.7.1989.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaśkowski, M. (2013), ‘Konsekwencje prawne Protokołu nr 30 w sprawie stosowania Karty praw podstawowych Unii Europejskiej do Polski i Zjednoczonego Królestwa’ [Legal consequences of Protocol no. 30 on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in Poland and the United Kingdom], Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 29–50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jeney, P. (2016), ‘The scope of the EU Charter and its application by the Hungarian courts,’ Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2016.57.1.510.1556/2052.2016.57.1.5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jóźwicki, W. (2019), Ochrona wyższego niż unijny konstytucyjnego standard prawa jednostki I tożsamości konstytucyjnej RP. Trybunał Konstytucyjny a Trybunał Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej: ku sekwencji a nie hierarchii orzekania [Protection of a Constitutional Fundamental Rights Standard Higher than European Union’s and of Polish Constitutional Identity. Constitutional Tribunal and Court of Justice of the European Union: From a Hierarchical Towards a Sequential Model of Adjudication], Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.10.14746/amup.9788323237051
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Knook, A. (2005), ‘The Court, the Charter, and the vertical division of powers in the European Union,’ Common Market Law Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 367–398.10.54648/COLA2005004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kowalik-Bańczyk, K. & Wróblewski, M. (2015), ‘Application of the Charter of fundamental rights by Polish courts and the jurisprudence of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal,’ Yearbook of Polish European Studies, vol. 18, pp. 239–246.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Komárek, J. (2005), ‘Why national constitutional courts should not embrace EU fundamental rights,’ in S. Weatherill, S. De Vries & U. Bernitz.(eds.) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Binding Instrument, Oxford: Hart, pp. 75–92.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Komárek, J. (2014), ‘National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy,’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou04810.1093/icon/mou048
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Komárek, J. (2017), ‘National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy: a rejoinder,’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox05210.1093/icon/mox052
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koncewicz, T. T. & Podolska, A. (2014), ‘Karta Praw Podstawowych w sądach polskich. Mit, marzenie czy rzeczywistość’ [Charter of Fundamental Rights before Polish courts. Myth, dream or reality], Palestra, nos. 3–4, pp. 247–252.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kühn, Z. (2008), ‘Listina základních práv EU a český ústavní pořádek’ [The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and Czech constitutional order], in K. Klíma & J. Jirásek (eds.) Pocta Jánu Gronskému [Homage to Ján Gronský], Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, pp. 112–120.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kustra, A. (2015), ‘Reading the tea leaves: the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and the preliminary ruling procedure,’ German Law Journal, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1543–1568. https://doi.org/10.1017/S207183220002126X10.1017/S207183220002126X
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kustra, A. (2016), ‘Poland’s constitutional crisis. From court-packing agenda to denial of Constitutional Court’s judgments,’ Toruńskie Studia Polsko-Włoskie – Studi Polacco Italiani di Toruń, vol. 12, pp. 343–366. https://doi.org/10.12775/TSP-W.2016.02210.12775/TSP-W.2016.022
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kustra, A. (2017), ‘The judgment of Polish Constitutional Court in case Supronowicz (SK 45/09): the constitutional borrowing of “Solange” formula and its outcomes for the European judicial dialogue,’ European Journal of Public Matters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kustra-Rogatka, A. (2018), ‘Constitutional courts and implementation of EU directives. Comparative analysis,’ Polish Yearbook of International Law, vol. 38, pp. 189–208.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Łazowski, A. & Wentkowska, A. (2010), ‘Poland: Constitutional drama and business as usual,’ in A. Lazowski (ed.) The Application of EU Law in the New Member States: Brave New World, Hague: TMC Asser Press, pp. 277–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-429-5_1010.1007/978-90-6704-429-5_10
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lenaerts, K. & Cambien, N. (2009), ‘The democratic legitimacy of the EU after the treaty of Lisbon,’ in J. Wouters (ed.) European Constitutionalism beyond Lisbon, Antwerp: Intersentia, pp. 185–207.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lenaerts, K. & Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A. (2014), ‘The place of the Charter in the EU constitutional edifice,’ in S. Peers & T. Hervey (eds.) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. A Commentary, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 1513–1568. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845259055_160010.5771/9783845259055_1600
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maślicki, J. (2015), ‘Kontrola konstytucyjności instrumentów implemntujących prawo pochodne Unii Europejskiej’ [The review of constitutionality of the acts implementing EU law], Państwo i Prawo, no. 6, pp. 67–81.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mazák, J.; Jánošiková, M.et al. (2016), The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in Proceedings Before Courts of the Slovak Republic, Košice: Pavol Jozef Šafárik University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nagy, C. I. (2017), ‘Do European Union Member States have to respect human rights? The application of the European Union’s ‘Federal Bill of Rights’ to Member States,’ Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18060/7909.004410.18060/7909.0044
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
N.S. (C-411/10) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department and M. E. and others (C-493/10) v. Refugee Applications Commissioner i Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2011], CJEU C-411/10, ECLI:EU:C:2011:865, 21.12.2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Paolo Biasiol from Rijeka v. Leopold Kesten from Rijeka and Getro Plc [2017], Constitutional Court of Croatia, U-III1095/2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Paris, D. (2017), ‘Constitutional courts as European Union courts: The current and potential use of EU law as a yardstick for constitutional review,’ Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 792–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1774723210.1177/1023263X17747232
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peter Gauweiler and Others v. Deutscher Bundestag [2015], CJEU C-62/14, ECLI :EU:C:2015:400, 16.5.2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Piccirilli, G. (2018), ‘The ‘Taricco saga’: the Italian Constitutional Court continues its European journey: Italian Constitutional Court, Order of 23 November 2016 no. 24/2017 Judgment of 10 April 2018 no. 115/2018 ECJ 8 September 2015, Case C-105/14, Ivo Taricco and Others; 5 December 2017, Case C-42/17, M.A.S. and M.B.,’ European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 814–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019618000433
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Półtorak, N. (2015), ‘Changes in the level of the national judicial protection under the EU influence on the example of the Polish legal system,’ in M. Bobek (ed.) Central European Judges Under the European Influence: The Transformative Power of the EU Revisited, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–240.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Półtorak, N. (2017), ‘Report on Poland,’ in L. Burgorgue-Larsen (ed.) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Seized by the National Judges, Paris: Pedone, pp. 569–584.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Podkowik, J. (2015), ‘Privacy in the digital era – Polish electronic surveillance law declared partially unconstitutional: Judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of Poland of 30 July 2014, K 23/11,’ European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961500032210.1017/S1574019615000322
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sadurski, W. (2019a), Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.000110.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sadurski, W. (2019b). ‘Polish Constitutional Tribunal under PiS: from an activist court to a paralysed rribunal, to a governmental enabler,’ Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-110.1007/s40803-018-0078-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schönlau, J. (2005), Drafting the EU Charter–Rights, Legitimacy and Process, London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978023051349510.1057/9780230513495
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spaventa, E. (2009), ‘Federalisation versus centralisation: tensions in fundamental rights discourse in the EU,’ in S. Currie & M. Dougan (eds.) 50 years of the European Treaties: Looking Backwards Thinking Forward, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 343–364.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spaventa, E. (2016), ‘The interpretation of Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: the dilemma of stricter or broader application of the Charter to national measures,’ European Parliament.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stefano Melloni v. Ministerio Fiscal [2013], CJEU C-399/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:107, 26.2.2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stehlík, V. (2012), Aplikace národních procesních předpisů v kontextu práva Evropské unie [The application of national procedural rules in the context of EU law], Prague: Leges.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Svobodová, M. (2018), ‘Působnost Listiny základních práv EU v kontextu judikatury Ústavního Soudu ČR’ [The scope of EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the context of case-law of Czech Constitutional Court], Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Iuridica, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 53–63. https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2018.3310.14712/23366478.2018.33
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sulyok, M. & Kiss, L. N. (2019), ‘Un-Chartered territory? The Charter of Fundamental Rights in the cases of the Hungarian Constitutional Court,’ Hungarian Yearbook of International and European Law, vol. 7.10.5553/HYIEL/266627012019007001022
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Guardian (2013), Reaction to Cameron’s EU speech: ‘A politics of cherry-picking will not work’, 3 January. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/jan/23/david-cameron-europe-international-reaction [accessed Nov 2019]
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thym, D. (2013), ‘Separation versus fusion – or: how to accommodate national autonomy and the Charter? Diverging visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice,’ European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961200122810.1017/S1574019612001228
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vereinigte Familiapress Zeitungsverlags- und vertriebs GmbH v. Heinrich Bauer Verlag [1997], CJEU C-368/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:325, 26.6.1997.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weiler, J. H. H. (1999), The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wróblewski, M. (2015), Stosowanie Karty Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskiej przez sądy polskie – z uwzględnieniem oceny rozwoju tego orzecznictwa na tle wyroków Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej [Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU by Polish courts – assessment in the light of jurisprudence of CJEU], Expert Opinion of INPRIS prepared for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Warsaw.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Keeping Safe Distance: Chapters from Randomised (Non)Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights before Polish Constitutional Tribunal

Abstract

Paradigm

My account