References
- Aitaly, A. (2010), ‘We are strong in unity,’ Aktiubinskii Vestnik, 29 April. Retrieved from http://avestnik.kz/amangeldy-ajtaly-my-silny-edinstvom-2 [accessed 8 Feb 2019]
- Altermatt, U. (2000), Etnonatsionalizm v Evrope [Ethnonationalism in Europe], Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.
- Bauman, Z. (2001), The Individualized Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Beck, U. & Levy, D. (2013), ‘Cosmopolitanized nations: re-imagining collectivity in world risk society,’ Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327641245722310.1177/0263276412457223
- Brubaker, R. (2004), Ethnicity without Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Chang, P.-C. (2012), ‘Going global and staying local: nation-building discourses in Singapore’s cultural policies,’ Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2012.745409.10.1080/1070289X.2012.745409
- Deklaratsiia… (2016), Deklaratsiia 25-letiia Nezavisimosti Respubliki Kazakhstan (Polnyi tekst) [Declaration of the 25th anniversary of Independence of the Republic of Kazakhstan (full text)], 23 November. Retrieved from http://www.matritca.kz/news/39092-deklaraciya-25-letiya-nezavisimosti-respubliki-kazahstan-polnyytekst.html [accessed 3 Mar 2019]
- Doktrina… (2010), Doktrina natsionalnogo edinstva Kazakhstana [The Doctrine of National Unity of Kazakhstan], 29 April. Retrieved from http://online.zakon.kz/m/document/?Doc_id=30501158 [accessed 9 Mar 2019]
- Farukshin, M. H. (2015), ‘Etnokratiia: zarubezhnyi diskurs’ [Ethnocracy: foreign discourse], Socis. Sociological Studies, no. 4, pp. 44–59.
- Golob, T. (2014), ‘Exploring identifications in the transnational social sphere: the potential of social fields,’ Sotsiologiia i postor, vol. 52, no. 2(199), pp. 123–139. https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.52.2.110.5673/sip.52.2.1
- Granin, Yu. D. (2015), ‘”Natsiia” i “etnos”: evolutsiia podkhodov i interpretatsii v filosofii i nauke XVIII–XX stoletii’ [“Nation” and “ethnos”: the evolution of approaches and interpretations in philosophy and science of the XVIII–XX centuries], Voprosy filosofii, no. 7, pp. 5–16.
- Habermas, J. (1999), The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Habermas, J. (2002), ‘Evropeiskoe natsionalnoe gosudarstvo: ego dostizheniia i predely. O proshlom i budushchem suvereniteta i grazhdanstva’ [‘The European nation state: its achievements and its limitations. On the past and future of sovereignty and citizenship], in B. Anderson et al. (eds.) Natsii i natsionalizm [Nations and Nationalism], transl. from English and German by L. E. Pereyaslavceva, M. S. Panin & M. B. Gnedovskiy, Moscow: Praksis, pp. 364–380.
- Heywood, A. (2002), Politics, London: Springer Nature Limited.
- Huntington, S. (1998), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York & London: Simon & Schuster.
- Huntington, S. (2004), Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity, New York & London: Simon & Schuster.
- Konstitutsiia Respubliki Kazakhstan (1993), Verkhovnyi Sovet Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 28 ianvaria 1993 goda. [Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Adopted at the ninth session of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan of the twelfth convocation on January 28, 1993]. Retrieved from https://zakon.uchet.kz/rus/history/K930001000_/06.09.1995 [accessed 12 Feb 2019]
- Konstitutsionnyi zakon… (1991), Konstitutsionnyi zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ‘O gosudarstvennoi nezavisimosti Respubliki Kazakhstan’ [The Constitutional Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of December 16, 1991 No. 1007-XII ‘On the State Independence of the Republic of Kazakhstan’]. Retrieved from http://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=1000798 [accessed 11 Feb 2019]
- Lähdesmäki, T. (2014), ‘The influence of cultural competence on the interpretations of territorial identities in European Capitals of Culture,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 4, no. 1(16), pp. 69–96. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-0005
- Martyanov, V. (2006), ‘Stroitelstvo politicheskoi natsii i etnonatsionalizm’ [Building a political nation and ethnonationalism], Logos, no. 2(53), pp. 94–109.
- Marx, K. (1980), Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857–1861 gg.: Pervonachalnyi variant Kapitala [Economic manuscripts of 1857–1861, Initial version of Capital], vol. 1, Moscow: Politizdat.
- Nazarbayev, N. A. (1997), ‘Kazakhstan-2030. Prosperity, security and ever growing welfare of all Kazakhstanis,’ Address by the President of the Republic to the people of Kazakhstan. Retrieved from http://massaget.kz/laws/rus/docs/K970002030 [accessed 11 Feb 2019]
- Nazarbayev, N. A. (2012), ‘Strategy ‘Kazakhstan-2050’. A new political course held by the state,’ Address by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan—Leader of the Nation N. A. Nazarbayev to the people of Kazakhstan. Retrieved from http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1200002050 [accessed 17 Feb 2019]
- Nazarbayev, N.A. (2017), ‘Vzgliad v budushchee: modernizatsiia obshchestvennogo soznaniia,’ [The course towards the future: modernization of public consciousness]. Retrieved from http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=36155529 [accessed 18 Feb 2019]
- ‘O kontseptsii…’ (1996), ‘O kontseptsii formirovaniia gosudarstvennoi identichnosti Respubliki Kazakhstan’ [The concept of the formation of state identity of the Republic of Kazakhstan], Razporiazhenie Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 23 maia 1996 goda N 2995. Retrieved from http://kazakhstan.news-city.info/docs/sistemsl/dok_pegeez.htm [accessed 11 Feb 2019]
- Pantin, V. I. & Lapkin, V. V. (2015), ‘Ethnopolitical and ethnosocial processes in post-Soviet countries (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine cases),’ Polis. Political Studies, no. 4, pp. 75–93. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.04.06
- Posadsky, A. (2015), ‘Zapadnye teorii grazhdanskoi natsii: sushchnostnye kharakteristiki i posledstviia vnedreniia’ [Western theories of a civic nation: essential characteristics and implications of implementation], Vsemirnyi Russkii Narodnyi Sobor, 10 July. Retrieved from http://www.vrns.ru/experts/3902 [accessed 15 Feb 2019]
- The National Idea… (2006), The National Idea of Kazakhstan: The Experience of Philosophical and Political Analysis, Almaty: Institute for Philosophy and Political Science MES RK.
- Tishkov, V. A. (2003), Rekviem po etnosy: Issledovaniia po sotsialno-kulturnoi antropologii [Requiem for ethnos: Studies on socio-cultural anthropology], Moscow: Nauka.
- UNDP (2004), Human Development Report 2004. Cultural Freedom in the Modern Diverse World, Oxford: United Nations Development Programme.
- Zakon Respubliki… (2011), Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 20 oktiabria 2008 goda No 70-IV ‘Ob Assamblee naroda Kazakhstana’ [About the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated October 20, 2008], in E. L. Tugzhanov (ed.) Gosudarstvennaia etnopolitika Kazakhstana: novye trendy: Metodicheskie posobie [National ethnopolitics of Kazakhstan: new trends: a methodological manual], Astana: Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, pp. 122–131.
- Zhizhek, S. (2005), ‘Multikulturalizm, ili kulturnaia logika mnogonatsionalnogo kapitalizma’ [Multiculturalism, or the cultural logic of multinational capitalism], in S. Zhizhek (ed.) Interpassivnost’, Zhelanie: Vlechenie. Multikulturalizm [Interpassivity. Desire: Attraction. Multiculturalism], St. Petersburg: Aletejya, pp. 59–147.