References
- Bacon, P. & Kato E. (2013), ‘Potential still untapped: Japanese perceptions of the European Union as an economic and normative power,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 59-84. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2013-002110.2478/bjes-2013-0021
- Bailer, S. (2014), ‘An agent dependent on the EU Member States? The determinants of the European Commission’s legislative success in the European Union,’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.80934210.1080/07036337.2013.809342
- Bergkamp, L. & Young P. D. (2013), ‘The organizational and administrative structures,’ in L. Bergkamp (ed.) The European Union REACH Regulation for Chemicals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Blaha, K. (2014), Interview from 15. 7. 2014 with Karel Blaha, European Chemicals Agency Administrative Board Member. Author’s archive.
- Braun, D. (2002), ‘Debate: State intervention and delegation to independent regulatory agencies,’ Swiss Political Science Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 93-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00336.x10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00336.x
- Busuioc, M.; Curtin, D. & Groenleer, M. (2012), ‘Agency growth between autonomy and accountability: the European Police Office as a “living institution”,’ in B. Rittberger & A. Wonka (eds.) Agency Governance in the EU, New York: Routledge, pp. 70-98.
- Craig, P. (2012), EU Administrative Law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568628.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568628.001.0001
- Dehousse, R. (2008), ‘Delegation of powers in the European Union: the need for a multiprincipals model,’ West European Politics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238080190607210.1080/01402380801906072
- Deloitte & Touche (2002), Feasibility Study on the Source Requirements for a Central Entity, June 2002. Ref. B4_3040/2001/329289/MAR/C3. Retrieved from http://chemicalspolicy.net/downloads/cereport.pdf [accessed Feb 2018]
- Delreux, T. (2008), ‘The EU as a negotiator in multilateral chemicals negotiations: multiple principals, different agents,’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1069-1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176080231185810.1080/13501760802311858
- Delreux, T. & Adriaensen, J. (2017), ‘Twenty years of principal-agent research in EU policies: how to cope with complexity?’ European Political Science, vol. 16, pp. 1-18.
- Delreux, T. & Kerremans, B. (2010), ‘How agents weaken their principals’ incentives to control: the case of EU negotiators and EU Member States in multilateral negotiations,’ European Integration, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/0703633100379755410.1080/07036331003797554
- Dowrick, F. E. (1954), ‘The relationship of principal and agent,’ The Modern Law Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1954.tb02143.x10.1111/j.1468-2230.1954.tb02143.x
- EC (2013), Interview from 24. 4. 2014 with the EU official from the European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry, Unit F4 REACH.
- ECHA (2016a), ‘About us’, European Chemicals Agency. Retrieved from http://echa.europa.eu/about-us [accessed Feb 2018]
- ECHA (2016b), ‘Executive Director,’ European Chemicals Agency. Retrieved from http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13560/biography_geert_dancet_en.pdf [accessed Feb 2018]
- Follesdal, A. & Hix, S. (2006), ‘Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 533-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
- Gilardi, F. (2002), ‘Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: insights from rational choice institutionalism,’ Swiss Political Science Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 93-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00336.x10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00336.x
- Harlow, C. (2011), ‘Three phases in the evolution of EU administrative law,’ in P. Craig & G. De Búrca (eds.) The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hedge, D. M.; Scicchitano, M. J. & Metz, P. (1991), ‘The principal-agent model and regulatory federalism,’ The Western Political Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1055-1080. https://doi.org/10.2307/44880710.2307/448807
- Helwig, N. (2017), ‘Agent interaction as a source of discretion of the EU High Representative,’ in T. Delreux & J. Adriaensen (eds.) The Principal-Agent Model and the European Union, London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55137-1_510.1007/978-3-319-55137-1_5
- Héritier, A. & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008), ‘The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance,’ Journal of Public Policy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X0800075510.1017/S0143814X08000755
- Jain, K. R. & Pandey, S. (2013), ‘Indian elites and the EU as a normative power,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 105-126. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2013-002310.2478/bjes-2013-0023
- Jansen, T. (2009), ‘The democratic deficit of the European Union, Living Reviews in Democracy, vol. 1, pp. 1-8.
- Joergens, Ch. (2002), ‘The law’s problems with the governance of the Single European Market,’ in Ch. Jeorgens & R. Dehousse (eds.) Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.0001
- Karagiannis, Y. & Guidi, M. (2017), ‘Principal-agent models and EU policy-making,’ in N. Zahariadis & L. Buonanno (eds.) Routledge Handbook of European Public Policy, London: Routledge, pp. 1-11.
- Kassim, H. & Menon, A. (2003), ‘The principal-agent approach and the study of the European Union: promise unfulfilled?’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017603200004697610.1080/1350176032000046976
- Kelemen, R. D. & Tarrant, A. D. (2011), ‘The political foundations of the eurocracy,’ West European Politics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 922-947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.59107610.1080/01402382.2011.591076
- Majone, G. (1996), Regulating Europe, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020343919710.4324/9780203439197
- Majone, G. (1998), ‘Europe’s “democratic deficit”: the question of standards,’ European Law Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.0004010.1111/1468-0386.00040
- Majone, G. (2002), ‘Delegation of regulatory powers in a mixed polity,’ European Law Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.0015610.1111/1468-0386.00156
- Maskin, E. & Tirole, J. (1992), ‘The principal-agent relationship with an informed principal, II: common values,’ Econometrica, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/295167410.2307/2951674
- McCubbins, M. & Schwartz, T. (1987), ‘Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms,’ in M. McCubbins & T. Sullivan (eds.) Congress: Structure and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Meroni v. High Authority [1958] Judgment of the Court from 13 June 1958 Meroni & Co., Industrie Metallurgiche, S.A.S., v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, Case 10/56.
- München Universität v. Hauptzollamt München-Mitte [2001] Judgement of the Court of 21 November 2001, Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesfinanzhof - Germany, Case C-269/90.
- Mitnick, B. M. (1973), Fiduciary rationality and public policy: The theory of agency and some consequences. Paper presented at the 1973 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.10.2139/ssrn.1020859
- Moe, T. M. (1984), ‘The new economics of organization,’ American Journal of Political Science, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 739-777. https://doi.org/10.2307/211099710.2307/2110997
- Moravcsik, A. (2002), ‘In defence of the “democratic deficit”: reassessing legitimacy in the European Union,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 519-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.0039010.1111/1468-5965.00390
- Pollack, M. A. (1997), ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community,’ International Organization, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 99-134. https://doi.org/10.1162/00208189755031110.1162/002081897550311
- Schütze, R. (2012), European Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113903176910.1017/CBO9781139031769
- Shapiro, M. (2011), ‘Independent agencies,’ in P. Craig & G. De Búrca (eds.) The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Shapiro, S. P. (2005), ‘Agency theory,’ Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 31, pp. 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.12215910.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122159
- Stake, R. (1994), ‘Case studies,’ in N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Thatcher, M. (2006), ‘European regulation,’ in J. Richardson (ed.) European Union. Power and Policy-Making, 3rd ed., London: Routledge.
- Trondal, J. & Jeppesen, L. (2008), ‘Images of agency governance in the European Union,’ West European Politics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 417-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238080193963610.1080/01402380801939636
- Waterman, R. W. & Meier, K. J. (1998), ‘Principal-agent models: an expansion?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 173-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a02437710.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024377
- White, R. E. (2010), Shall We Dance? The Role of Agents in Managing the Principal-Agent Relationship, Iowa State University, Department of Management, College of Business.10.5465/ambpp.2010.54501019
- Yin, R. K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Zito, A. R. (2009), ‘European agencies as agents of governance and EU learning,’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1224-1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176090333279510.1080/13501760903332795