Have a personal or library account? Click to login
University–Industry Interaction Trends in the Baltic Sea Region: A Bibliometric Analysis Cover

University–Industry Interaction Trends in the Baltic Sea Region: A Bibliometric Analysis

Open Access
|Nov 2017

References

  1. Alcaraz-Rodriguez, R.; Villasana, M. & Alvarez, M. (2014), ‘The significance of the university environment for entrepreneurship education: a case study of an entrepreneurial university in Mexico,’ in A. Meerman & T. Kliewe (eds.) Fostering University-Industry Relationships, Entrepreneurial Universities and Collaborative Innovation, UIIN Good Practice Series 2014, Amsterdam: University Industry Innovation Network, pp. 107–118.
  2. BSR STAR (2015), Innovation in the Baltic Sea Region. Retrieved from http://www.bsrstars.se/project/facts-figures-2/ [accessed 28 Mar 2015]
  3. Butcher, J. & Jeffrey, P. (2005), ‘The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry–academia collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment,’ Technovation, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1273–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.06.00310.1016/j.technovation.2004.06.003
  4. Calvert, J. & Patel, P. (2002), ‘University-industry research collaborations in the UK,’ Report on Phase 1 of a project funded by EPSRC/ESRC Contract No. P015615, Brighton: SPRU.
  5. Calvert, J. & Patel, P. (2003), ‘University-industry research collaborations in the UK: bibliometric trends,’ Science and Public Policy, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 85–96. https://doi.org/10.3152/14715430378178059710.3152/147154303781780597
  6. Communication COM(2009) 248 final from the Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Region concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, Brussels, 10.6.2009. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/communic/baltic/com_baltic_en.pdf [accessed 28 Mar 2015]
  7. De Fuentes, C. & Dutrénit, G. (2012), ‘Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit,’ Research Policy, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1666–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.02610.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026
  8. Diem, A. & Wolter, S. C. (2011), The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences, Leading House Working Paper, no. 66, Aarau: Swiss Coordination Centre for Research in Education (SCCRE).
  9. Etzkowitz, H. (2003), ‘Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations,’ Social Science Information, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 293–337.10.1177/05390184030423002
  10. Etzkowitz, H. (2011), ‘Triple helix model,’ Innovation, no. 4, pp. 5–10.
  11. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000), ‘The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations,’ Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-410.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  12. Feng, F.; Zhang, L.; Du, Y. & Wang, W. (2015), ‘Visualization and quantitative study in bibliographic databases: A case in the field of university–industry cooperation,’ Journal of Informetrics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.00910.1016/j.joi.2014.11.009
  13. Fiaz, M. (2013), ‘An empirical study of university–industry R&D collaboration in China: Implications for technology in society,’ Technology in Society, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.00510.1016/j.techsoc.2013.03.005
  14. Hall, B. H.; Link, A. N. & Scott, J. T. (2001), ‘Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the Advanced Technology Program,’ Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 26, nos. 1–2, pp. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100788831279210.1023/A:1007888312792
  15. Hameri, A.-P. (1996), ‘Technology transfer between basic research and industry,’ Technovation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)00030-510.1016/0166-4972(95)00030-5
  16. Holmes, R. (2014), ‘U-Multirank – A university ranking evaluation,’ University World News, 12 September, no. 334.
  17. Interreg Baltic Sea Region (n.d.), Programme for 2014 to 2020. Retrieved from http://eu.baltic.net/Interreg-Baltic-Sea-Region-2014-2020.26029.html [accessed 28 Mar 2015]
  18. Jones-Evans, D.; Klofsten, M.; Andersson, E. & Pandya, D. (1999), ‘Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: the role of the Industrial Liaison Office,’ R&D Management, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.0011610.1111/1467-9310.00116
  19. Katz, J. S. & Martin, B. R. (1997), ‘What is a research collaboration?’ Research Policy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-110.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
  20. Kerikmäe, T.; Hamulak, O. & Chochia, A. (2016), ‘A historical study of contemporary human rights: deviation or extinction,’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 98–115. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2016.2.0610.11590/abhps.2016.2.06
  21. Kostoff, R. N.; Toothman, D. R.; Eberhart, H. J. & Humenik, J. A. (2001), ‘Text mining using database tomography and bibliometrics: a review,’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 223–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00133-010.1016/S0040-1625(01)00133-0
  22. Meredith, S. & Burkle, M. (2008), ‘Building bridges between university and industry: theory and practice,’ Education+Training, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/0040091081087398210.1108/00400910810873982
  23. Merriam-Webster (n.d.), ‘Collaboration,’ An Encyclopedia Britannica Company. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/collaboration [accessed 21 Apr 2015]
  24. Morris, S.; DeYong, C.; Wu, Z.; Salman, S. & Yemenu, D. (2002), ‘DIVA: a visualization system for exploring document databases for technology forecasting,’ Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 841–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00143-210.1016/S0360-8352(02)00143-2
  25. Mowery, D. C. & Sampat, B. N. (2004), ‘Universities in national innovation systems,’ Proceedings of the the First Globelics Academy, PhD School on National Systems of Innovation and Economic Development, Lisbon, Portugal, 25 May – 4 June 2004. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1853/43161 [accessed 28 Mar 2015]
  26. Mowery, D. C. & Sampat, B. N. (2005), ‘Universities in national innovation systems,’ in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–239.
  27. Muravska, T. & Prause, G. (2012), European Integration and Baltic Sea Studies: University-Business Partnership through the Triple Helix, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
  28. OECD (2013), Main Science and Technology Indicators: 2014, no. 1, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  29. Orecchini, F.; Valitutti, V. & Vitali, G. (2012), ‘Industry and academia for a transition towards sustainability: advancing sustainability science through university–business collaborations,’ Sustainability Science, vol. 7, supplement 1, pp. 57–73.10.1007/s11625-011-0151-3
  30. Pendlebury, D. A. (2008), Using Bibliometrics in Evaluating Research, Philadelphia: Thomson Scientific, Research Department.
  31. Polt, W.; Rammer, C.; Schartinger, D.; Gassler, H. & Schibany, A. (2001), Benchmarking Industry–Science Relations in Europe: The Role of Framework Conditions, Brussels: DG Enterprise. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/improving/docs/ser_conf_bench_polt.pdf [accessed 22 May 2004]10.3152/147154301781781453
  32. Pritchard, A. (1969), ‘Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics,’ Journal of Documentation, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 348–349.
  33. Qin, J.; Lancaster, F. W. & Allen, B. (1997), ‘Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences,’ Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 893–916. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<;893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X
  34. Rappert, B.; Webster, A. & Charles, D. (1999), ‘Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic–industrial relations and intellectual property,’ Research Policy, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 873–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00028-110.1016/S0048-7333(99)00028-1
  35. Säär, A. & Rull, A., (2015), ‘Technology transfer in the EU: exporting strategically important ICT solutions to other EU Member States,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 5, no. 2(19), pp. 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2015-001110.1515/bjes-2015-0011
  36. Scott, A.; Steyn, G.; Geuna, A.; Brusoni, S. & Steinmueller, E. (2001), The Economic Returns to Basic Research and the Benefits of University–Industry Relationships. Report for the Office of Science and Technology, University of Sussex: SPRU (Science and Technology Policy Research). Retrieved from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/publications/econreturnsost.pdf [accessed 22 May 2004]
  37. Senker, J.; Faulkner, W. & Velho, L. (1998), ‘Science and technology knowledge flows between industrial and academic research: a comparative study,’ in H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster & P. Healey (eds.) Captilizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 111–132.
  38. Smorodinskaya, N. (2012), ‘The global paradigm shift and the emanation of the network economy,’ Journal of Economic Sociology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 95–115.10.17323/1726-3247-2012-4-95-115
  39. The Global Innovation Index (2015), Effective Innovation Policies for Development, Fontainebleau, Ithaca & Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD & WIPO.
  40. World Economic Forum (2006), The Global Competitiveness Report 2006–2007, Geneva.
  41. World Economic Forum (2008), The Global Competitiveness Report 2008–2009, Geneva.
  42. World Economic Forum (2009), The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010, Geneva.
  43. World Economic Forum (2010), The Global Competitiveness Report 2010–2011, Geneva.
  44. World Economic Forum (2011), The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012, Geneva.
  45. World Economic Forum (2012), The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013, Geneva.
  46. World Economic Forum (2013), The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014, Geneva.
  47. World Economic Forum (2014), The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015, Geneva.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 28 - 58
Published on: Nov 10, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Elena Murashova, Valeria Loginova, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.