References
- Act on Mediation (Czech Republic), Act No. 2002/2012 Coll.
- Act on Takeover Bids (Czech Republic), Act. No. 104/2008 Coll.
- Balarin, J. & Tichý, L. (2013), ‘Kolektivní ochrana procesních práv v ČR: sen či skutečnost? (návrh právní úpravy a jeho odůvodnění)’ [The Collective redress of procedural rights in Czech Republic: Dream or reality?)], Bulletin advokacie [Bulletin of Advocacy], vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 17-26.
- Bělohlávek, A. J. (2012), Zákon o rozhodčím řízení a o výkonu rozhodčích nálezů: Komentář, 2nd edition (Act on Arbitration Proceedings and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: The Commentary), Prague: C. H. Beck.
- BGH (1998), German Bundesgerichtshof decision, VI ZR 260/97, 30 June 1998.
- — (2001), German Bundesgerichtshof decision, VI ZR 208/00, 8 May 2001.
- — (2008), German Bundesgerichtshof decision, IX ZR 158/07, 6 November 2008.
- CCC (1997), Czech Constitutional Court decision, III. ÚS 144/97, 2 June 1997.
- — (2011), Czech Constitutional Court decision, I. ÚS 3227/07, 8 March 2011.
- Civil Code (Czech Republic), Act No. 40/1964 Coll., Act No. 89/2012 Coll.
- Code of Civil Procedure (Czech Republic), Act No. 99/1963 Coll.
- Commercial Code (Czech Republic), Act No. 513/1991 Coll.
- Consumer Protection Act (Czech Republic), Act. No. 634/1992 Coll.
- CSC (2012), Czech Supreme Court resolution, 20 Cdo 2487/2010, 16 August 2012.
- DCFR (2009), Study Group on European Civil Code and Research Group on EC Private Law. Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/civil/docs/dcfr_outline_edition_en.pdf [accessed 9 Sep 2015]
- EC = European Commission (2001), ‘Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress,’ Commission Public Consultation, SEC (2011) 173 final, 4.2.2011.
- — (2004), Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation), Official Journal of the European Union, L 364, 9.12.2004, pp. 1-11.
- — (2005), Commission Green Paper Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules, SEC(2005) 1732, 19.12.2005, COM (2005) 672.
- — (2008a), Commission Green Paper on Consumer Collective Redress, COM(2008) 794 final, 27.11.2008.
- — (2008b), Commission White Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, SEC(2008) 404, SEC(2008) 405, SEC(2008) 406, 2.4.2008, COM (2008) 165.
- — (2008c), Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2008/52/EC on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters, Official Journal of the European Union, L 136, 24.5.2008, pp. 3-8.
- — (2009), Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2009/22/EC on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests Official Journal of the European Union, L 110, 1.5.2009, pp. 30-36.
- — (2013a), ‘Towards a European Horizontal Framework for Collective Redress,’ Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2013) 401 final, 11.6.2013.
- — (2013b), Recommendation of Commission 2013/396/EU on common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms in the Member States concerning the violations of rights granted under Union Law, Official Journal of the European Union, L 201, 26.7.2013, pp. 60-65.
- European Commission - DG Sanco (2008), Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Collective Redress Mechanisms in the European Union, Civic Consulting (Lead) and Oxford Economics. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/archive/redress_cons/finalreportevaluationstudypart1-final2008-11-26.pdf [accessed 9 Sep 2015]
- Freer, R. D. (2012), Civil Procedure, 3rd edition, Aspen: Wolters Kluwer.
- Notarial Code (Czech Republic), Act No. 358/1992 Coll.