Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The European Dimensions of Vocational Training Cover

The European Dimensions of Vocational Training

By: Tamás Sós  
Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. Act CLXXX VII. of 2011 law about vocational training. Retrieved from www.net.jogtar.hu
  2. Báthory, Z. (2000). Students, schools, differences. The outlines of a refined learning theory. Budapest: OKKER Oktatási Kiadó.
  3. Benedek, A. (2002). Regime change in vocational education. In Vocational education at the turn of the Millennium (pp. 43-63).
  4. Benedek, A. (2015). So, how is dual? Labor review (2), 3-5.
  5. Education and Training 2020. Retrieved from www.europe.eu
  6. European Center for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP). (2011). A short historical overview of the Hungarian vocational training. Retrieved from www.cedefop.europa.eu
  7. Fedor, M. (2001): EU dimensions in the Hungarian vocational education. New Pedagogical Review, 42(2), 153-155.
  8. Halász, G. (1999). European public education and the world of work. New Pedagogical Review 42(2), 47-55.
  9. Horn, D. (2009). Making vocational training and vocational education attractive, improving their quality. Retrieved from www.ofi.hu/tudattar
  10. Horn, D. (2014) Do we unnecessarily force dual vocational training at home? Retrieved from www.portfolio.hu
  11. Kajdy, J. (2015). With student contract and co-operation in the world of work. MKIK.
  12. Köllő, J. (2011). From the so called shortage of skilled workers to dual training. Retrieved from www.tarki-tudok.hu
  13. Lannert, J. (1997). Vocational training at crossroads. Educatio, (3), 603-606.
  14. Liskó, I. (2008). Vocational education and dropping-out. In Green Book. For the reform of the Hungarian public education (pp. 95-119).
  15. Matheika, Z. (2013). The characteristics of youth unemployment in Hungary. Retrieved from www.fesbp.hu/tanulmany/tarki
  16. Mártonfi, G. (2011). Way to the labor market – from special vocational schools.
  17. Mártonfi, G. (2013). Early dropping-out in the Hungarian vocational education. In CEDEFOP REFERNET Hungary (pp. 1-22).
  18. Nagy, L. (2005). The competency based modular vocational training structure. Vocational Training Review, 21(4), 337-344.
  19. NMH (2014) Regulation of vocational training. Information for the preparation of vocational training experts for the changes in vocational training.
  20. Ostorics, L. (2015). The lessons of the PISA and the national competency surveys. Retrieved from www.oktatas.hu/kozneveles/meresek
  21. Pőcze, G. (1995). NCC and practice: the implementation of the National Core Curriculum. New Pedagogical Review, 45(4), 12-35.
  22. Radó, P. (2013). About the causes of declension of PISA results 2012. Retrieved from www.oktpolcafe.hu
  23. Sós, T. (2006). Strategic turn in vocational education. Vocational Education Review, 22(2), 179-194.
  24. Sós, T. (2015). The transforming vocational education and the demand-supply processes of the labor market in Northern Hungary (Manuscript).
  25. The Copenhagen Declaration of the European Ministers of Vocational Education and Traning and of the European Commission (2002). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu
  26. Tóth, P. (2014). Changing vocational training, changing pedagogical environment. Opus et Educatio, 1(1), 32-47.
  27. www.csmkik.hu
  28. www.ksh.hu
  29. www.nive.hu
  30. www.nszf.munka.hu
  31. www.oecd.org/pisa OECD-PISA 2000-2012
Language: English
Page range: 24 - 47
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2015 Tamás Sós, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.