Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative Analysis For Kinematics Of 5-DOF Industrial Robotic Manipulator Cover

Comparative Analysis For Kinematics Of 5-DOF Industrial Robotic Manipulator

Acta Mechanica et Automatica
Volume 9 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By: Shiv Manjaree,  Bahadur Chand Nakra and  Vijyant Agarwal  
Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. 1. Aghajarian M., Kiani K. (2011), Inverse Kinematics Solution of PUMA 560 Robot Arm using ANFIS, 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence, Songdo Conventia, Korea.10.1109/URAI.2011.6145885
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Agarwal V., Mittal A.P., Nakra B.C. (2005), A Study of Fuzzy Logic Based Inverse Kinematics Solution, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Applications in Electrical Engineering, IIT Roorkee, India.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Alavander S., Nigam M.J. (2008), Inverse Kinematics Solution of 3-DOF Planar Robot using ANFIS, International Journal of Computers, Communication and Control, 3,150-155.10.15837/ijccc.2008.3.2391
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Azadivar F. (1987), The Effect of Joint Position Errors of Industrial Robots on Their Performance in Manufacturing Operations, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-3 (2), 109-114.10.1109/JRA.1987.1087082
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Bachir O., Zoubir A. (2012), Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference System based Control of PUMA 600 Robot Manipulator, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2 (1), 90-97.10.11591/ijece.v2i1.116
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Bingul Z, Karahan O. 2011, A Fuzzy Logic Controller tuned with PSO for 2 DOF robot trajectory control, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1017-1031.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Chen C, Wu T, Peng C. 2010, Robust trajectories following control of a 2-link robot manipulator via coordinate transformation for manufacturing applications, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 27, 569-580.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Conkur E. (2003), Path following algorithm for highly redundant manipulators, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 45, 1-22.10.1016/S0921-8890(03)00083-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Corke P.I. (2011), Robotics Toolbox for MATLAB (Release 9), http://petercorke.com/Robotics_Toolbox.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Denavit J, Hartenberg R.S. (1955), A kinematic notation for lower pair mechanisms based on matrices, ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 77, 215-221.10.1115/1.4011045
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Efe M.O., Kaynak O. (2000), A comparative study of soft-computing methodologies in identification of robotic manipulators, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Elsevier, 30, 221-230.10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00087-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Elgazzar S. (1985), Efficient Kinematic Transformations for the PUMA 560 Robot, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-1 (3),142-151.10.1109/JRA.1985.1087013
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Er M.J., Yap S.M., Yeaw C.W., Luo F.L. (1997), A Review of Neural-Fuzzy Controllers for Robotic Manipulators, Conference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Gasparetto A, Zanotto V. (2007), A new method for smooth trajectory planning of robotic manipulators, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 42, 455-471.10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.04.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Homaifar A, Sayyarrodsari B, Hogans J. (1994), Fuzzy Controller for Robot Arm Trajectory, Information Sciences, 2, 69-83.10.1016/1069-0115(94)90012-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Jang J.S.R. (1993), ANFIS: Adaptive Network based Fuzzy Inference System. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 665-685.10.1109/21.256541
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Karlik B, Aydin S. (2000), An improved approach to the solution of inverse kinematics problems for robot manipulators, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 13, 159-164.10.1016/S0952-1976(99)00050-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Kim W.S., Tendick F., Stark L.W. (1987), Visual Enhancements in Pick-and-Place Tasks: Human Operators Controlling a Simulated Cylindrical Manipulator, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-3 (5), 418-425.10.1109/JRA.1987.1087127
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Koyuncu B., Guzel M. (2007), Software development for the kinematic control of Lynx6 Robot Arm, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 252-257.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Kuo C, Wang S. (1991), Robust Position Control of Robotic Manipulator in Cartesian Coordinates, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 7, 653-659.10.1109/70.97877
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Manjaree S., Shah J., Nakra B.C. (2010), Studies on Kinematics of Robotic Systems Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques, M Tech Thesis, Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Manjaree S. (2013), Inverse Kinematic Analysis of 3-degree-of-freedom Robotic Manipulator using three different methods, International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology, 6(3), 71-80.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Manjaree S., Agarwal V., Nakra B.C. (2013), Inverse Kinematics using Neuro-Fuzzy Intelligent Technique for Robotic Manipulator, International Journal of Advanced Computer Research, 3(4), 160-165.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Manseur R. (1996), A software package for computer-aided robotics education, Proceedings of 26th Annual Conference on Frontiers in Education, Salt Lake City, UT.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Mittal R.K., Nagrath I.J. (2003), Robotics and Control, Tata Mc Graw Hill Publishing Company Limited.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Mohan S., Bhanot S. (2007), Comparative Study of Some Adaptive Fuzzy Algorithms for Manipulator Control, International Journal of Computational Intelligence, 3(4), 303-311.10.1155/2007/75653
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Niku S.B. (2009), Introduction to Robotics: Analysis, Systems, Applications, PHI Learning Private Limited, India.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Pravak Manual (2008), Model 1055, Pravak Cybernetics, New Delhi.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Saha S.K. (2008), Introduction to Robotics, Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Shah J., Rattan S.S., Nakra B.C. (2013), End-Effector Position Analysis Using Forward Kinematics For 5 Dof Pravak Robot Arm, IAES International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2(3), 112-116.10.11591/ijra.v2i3.2015
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Tejomurtula S., Kak S. (1999), Inverse kinematics in robotics using neural networks, Information Sciences, Elsevier, 116 (2), 147-164.10.1016/S0020-0255(98)10098-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Yahya S., Moghavvemi M, Haider A.F. Mohamed (2011), Geometrical approach of planar hyper-redundant manipulators: Inverse kinematics, trajectory planning and workspace, Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, 19, 406-422.10.1016/j.simpat.2010.08.001
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ama-2015-0037 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5319 | Journal ISSN: 1898-4088
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 229 - 240
Submitted on: Dec 2, 2014
Accepted on: Dec 14, 2015
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: Bialystok University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Kinematic Analysis,
Wrist,
ANFIS,
Membership Function,
Degree of Freedom
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Electronics,
Mechanical engineering,
Mechanics,
Bioengineering and biomedical engineering,
Biomechanics,
Civil engineering,
Environmental engineering

© 2015 Shiv Manjaree, Bahadur Chand Nakra, Vijyant Agarwal, published by Bialystok University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 9 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)Next article