The Counter-Hegemonic Virtues of Popular Culture in Eighteenth-Century England

Ivana, Dragoș

doi:10.1515/abcsj-2015-0005

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to re-examine popular culture in early-modern England by focusing on the oral/illiterate-written/literate and popular culture-high culture dyads. I aim to question why these interrelated socio-cultural categories have not been properly reconciled by the writers of the time. Moreover, my purpose is to focus on antiquarianism as a valid method whereby the delineation between the above-mentioned dichotomies turns into a subtle relationship in which both terms become complementary. I shall focus on two important antiquarian texts - Henry Bourne’s Antiquitates Vulgares (1725) and John Brand’s Observations on Popular Antiquities (1777) - by considering issues of religion and national identity, in an attempt to show that popular culture made known its counter-hegemonic virtues which, though permanently negotiated, were never rejected by the polite. Ultimately, the unstable relationship between the high and the low will be seen as suggestive of the porous boundaries between the two, indicating, at the same time, popular culture’s participatory role in rethinking cultural identity in Enlightenment England.

References

Barrel, John. The Political Theory of Painting from Reynolds to Hazlitt: “The Body of the Public.” New Heaven, Connecticut and London: Yale University Press, 1986. Print.
Search in Google Scholar
Bourne, Henry. Antiquitates Vulgares; Or, the Antiquities of the Common People. Giving an Account of Several of their Opinions and Ceremonies. With reflections upon each of them; shewing which may be retain'd, and which ought to be laid aside. Newcastle: J. White, 1725. Print.
Search in Google Scholar
Brand, John. Observations on popular antiquities: chiefly illustrating the origin of our vulgar customs, ceremonies, and superstitions. Rev. by Henry Ellis. London: F. C. and D. Rivington, 1813. Print.
Search in Google Scholar
Davies, L.I. “Orality, Literacy, Popular Culture: An Eighteenth-Century Case Study.” Oral Tradition 25/2 (2010): 305-323. Print.10.1353/ort.2010.0024
Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. A Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. London: J. and P. Knapton, 1755. Print.
Search in Google Scholar
Mullan, John. “The Invention of Popular Culture.” The Guardian 28 Oct. 2000. Web. 24 Sept. 2015.
Search in Google Scholar
Perry, Ruth, “The Finest Ballads: Women’s Oral Traditions in Eighteenth- Century Scotland.” Eighteenth-Century Life, 32.2, 2008: 81-97. Print.10.1215/00982601-2008-008
Search in Google Scholar
Reay, Barry. Popular Cultures in England 1550-1750. London and New York: Longman, 1998. Print.
Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, Pat. Popular Culture in Eighteenth-Century England. Sussex: Harvester Press; New Jersey: Barnes and Noble, 1986. Print.
Search in Google Scholar
St Clair, William. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Print.
Search in Google Scholar
Sweet, Rosemary. Antiquaries: The Discovery of the Past in Eighteenth-Century Britain. London and New York: Hambledon and London, 2004. Print.
Search in Google Scholar
Warner, William. Licensing Entertainment: The Elevation of Novel Reading in Britain, 1684-1750. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press, 1998. Print.
Search in Google Scholar

The Counter-Hegemonic Virtues of Popular Culture in Eighteenth-Century England

Abstract

Paradigm

My account