Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: A Clinical Perspective Cover

Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: A Clinical Perspective

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Intuitive Surgical [Internet]. Sunnyvale, CA: Intuitive Surgical; c2025. Intuitive Surgical Announces Preliminary Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Results; 2024 Jan 9 [cited 2025 Aug 27]. Available from: https://isrg.intuitive.com/news-releases/news-release-details/intuitive-announces-preliminary-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-3.
  2. Sheng S, Zhao T, Wang X. Comparison of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(34):e11817. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011817
  3. Štádler P, Dorosh J. Review and current update of robotic-assisted laparoscopic vascular surgery. Semin Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;34(4):225232. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.10.007
  4. Lengyel BC, Chinnadurai P, Corr SJ, et al. Robot-assisted vascular surgery: literature review, clinical applications, and future perspectives. J Robotic Surg. 2024 Aug 23;18(1):328. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02087-2
  5. Cusumano G, Calabrese G, Gallina FT, et al. Technical innovations and complex cases in robotic surgery for lung cancer: a narrative review. Curr Oncol. 2025 Apr 22;32(5):244. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050244
  6. Sutton W, O’Neill J, Strother E, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery and robotic-assisted first-rib excision and thoracic outlet syndrome decompression. Semin Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;37(1):8289. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.02.003
  7. Čelebić A, Jakimovska Stefanovska M, Miladinović M, et al. Evaluating the role of robotic surgery in gynecological cancer treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;51(4):109630. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109630
  8. Venkatakrishnan G, Nair K, Pillai Thankamony Amma BS, et al. Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Jul-Aug;15(4):102516. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102516
  9. Khaliel FH, Haq MI, Alsulbud AK, et al. “First-in-human” totally robotic orthotopic heart transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Jun;44(6):10001003. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2025.02.1685
  10. Emerson D, Megna D, Razavi AA, et al. Robotic lung transplantation: feasibility, initial experience, and 3-year outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2025 May;119(5):11071116. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.03.005
  11. Mourthadhoi F, Le Roy B, Blanc PY. Robotic minimally invasive duodenopancreatectomy with superior mesenteric artery approach (with video). J Visc Surg. 2025 Apr;162(2):157158. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.09.007
  12. Litvak A, Geiger J, Ford B, et al. An 8-year experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical management of median arcuate ligament syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 May;114:212218. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.01.039
  13. Wang H, Huang Z, Hu C, et al. Robotic-assisted combined transposition of left renal vein and gonadal vein as a novel treatment option for renal nutcracker syndrome: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 13;102(2):e32509. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032509
  14. Arslanhan G, Özcan ZS, Şenay Ş, et al. Robotic assisted minimally invasive coronary revascularisation: midterm results. Int J Med Robot. 2025 Jun;21(3):e70071. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70071
  15. Husen TF, Kohar K, Angelica R, Saputro BIL. Robotic vs other surgery techniques for mitral valve repair and/or replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2023 May-Jun;71:1625. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.12.011
  16. George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, Marescaux J, Satava RM. Origins of robotic surgery: from skepticism to standard of care. JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4):e2018.00039. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039
  17. Comstock’s [Internet]. Sacramento, CA: Comstock’s Nagazine; c2025. The legacy of Robodoc; 2022 Sep 19 [cited 2025 Aug 27]. Available from: https://www.comstocksmag.com/qa/legacy-robodoc
  18. Haidegger T, Nagy Z, Rudas I, Takács Á. Origins of surgical robotics: from space to the operating room. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica. 2016 Jan;12(5):1330. doi: 10.12700/aph.13.1.2016.1.3
  19. Intuitive Surgical [Internet]. Sunnyvale, CA: Intuitive Surgical; c2025. Intuitive Surgical and Computer Motion announce merger agreement; 2003 Mar 7 [cited 2025 Aug 27]. Available from: https://isrg.intuitive.com/news-releases/news-release-details/intuitive-surgical-and-computer-motion-announce-merger-agreement.
  20. Marescaux J, Rubino F. The ZEUS robotic system: experimental and clinical applications. Surg Clin North Am. 200 Dec;83(6):130415, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00169-5
  21. Palep JH. Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2009 Jan;5(1):17. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.51313.
  22. Narihiro S, Nakashima S, Kazi M, et al. Effectiveness of fluorescence-guided methods using near-infrared fluorescent clips of robotic colorectal surgery: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2023 May 17;9(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40792-023-01666-z
  23. Scott-Wittenborn N, Jackson RS. Intraoperative imaging during minimally invasive transoral robotic surgery using near-infrared light. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Mar-Apr;39(2):220222. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.09.001
  24. Kamada T, Ohdaira H, Nakashima K, et al. Real-time vessel navigation using indocyanine green fluorescence during robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer after coronary artery bypass grafting using the right gastroepiploic artery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023 Jul;16(3):533536. doi: 10.1111/ases.13161
  25. Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Chu C, Schuessler RB, Damiano, RJ Jr. Surgical robotics: impact of motion scaling on task performance. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Dec;199(6):863868. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.08.027
  26. Huang YM, Huang YJ, Wei PL. Colorectal cancer surgery using the Da Vinci Xi and Si systems: comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Innov. 2019 Apr;26(2):192200. doi: 10.1177/1553350618816788
  27. Lei KY, Xie WJ, Fu SQ, Ma M, Sun T. A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 30;21(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w
  28. Rae-Dupree J. Feel the precision: next-gen robotic surgery with haptic feedback. IEEE Pulse. 2025 Jan-Feb;16(1):1215. doi: 10.1109/MPULS.2025.3526484
  29. Usai M, Solinas E, Fabio C, et al. Fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the role of interventional radiology. Front Radiol. 2025 Mar 12;5:1548211. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2025.1548211
  30. Takeshita K, Takahashi N, Takano Y, et al. Utility of near-infrared fluorescent clip for the robot-assisted gastrectomy: report of 2 cases (case series). Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Dec;125:110576. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110576
  31. Kusano T, Aoki T, Saito K, et al. An initial report of robotic-assisted anatomical liver resection with indocyanine green fluorescence navigation using the ultrasound-guided preoperative positive staining technique. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Oct;17(4):e13381. doi: 10.1111/ases.13381
  32. Stádler P, Matouš P, Vitásek P, Špaček M. Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: a review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Nov;44(5):915919. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.07.045
  33. Stádler P, Matouš P, Vitásek P, Špaček M. Is robotic surgery appropriate for vascular procedures? Report of 100 aortoiliac cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Nov;36:401404. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.028
  34. Stádler P, Dvoracek L, Vitásek P, Matouš P. Robotic vascular surgery, 150 cases. Int J Med Robot. 2010 Dec;6(4):394398. doi: 10.1002/rcs.344
  35. Lin JC, Reddy DJ, Eun D, Fumo M, Menon M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dissection of the infrarenal aorta and iliac artery: a technical description and early results. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):298302. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.04.019
  36. Sutter W, Alsac JM, Ben Abdallah I, et al. Treatment of aortoiliac occlusive lesions by aortic robotic surgery: learning curve and midterm outcome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;104:258267. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.02.018
  37. Fernandez JD, Garrett HE Jr, Cal N. Robot-assisted minimally invasive procedure for descending aorta–bifemoral bypass: a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009 Feb-Mar;43(1):9395. doi: 10.1177/1538574408322753
  38. Lin JC, Eun D, Shrivastava A, Shepard AD, Reddy DJ. Total robotic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;23(2):255.e19–255.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.02.019
  39. Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, et al. Technical details and preliminary results of a full robotic type II endoleak treatment with the da Vinci Xi. J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):505509. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00944-z
  40. Stádler P, Sebesta P, Vitásek P, Matous P, El Samman K. A modified technique of transperitoneal direct approach for totally laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Sep;32(3):2669. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.01.023
  41. Łajczak PM, Jóźwik K. Beyond the Band-Aid: robot-assisted laparoscopy for splenic aneurysms—a systematic review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;109:5562. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.05.026
  42. Marone EM, Peri A, Argenti F, et al. Robotic treatment of complex splenic artery aneurysms with deep hilar location: technical insights and midterm results. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:5056. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.039
  43. Rinaldi LF, Brioschi C, Marone EM. Robotic surgery for elective repair of visceral and renal artery aneurysms: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(12):3385. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123385
  44. Gerull WD, Sherrill WW, Awad MM. Robotic median arcuate ligament release: management algorithm and clinical outcomes from a large minimally invasive series. Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):395662. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09545-8
  45. Fernstrum C, Pryor M, Wright GP, Wolf AM. Robotic surgery for median arcuate ligament Syndrome. JSLS. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2):e2020.00017. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00014
  46. Relles D, Moudgill N, Rao A, Rosato F, DiMuzio P, Eisenberg J. Robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):5003. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.057
  47. Chau AH, Abdul-Muhsin H, Peng X, Davila VJ, Castle EP, Money SR. Robotic-assisted left renal vein transposition as a novel surgical technique for the treatment of renal nutcracker syndrome. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2018 Feb 13;4(1):3134. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2017.09.008
  48. Wang P, Jing T, Qin J, Xia D, Wang S. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transposition of the left renal vein for treatment of the nutcracker syndrome. Urology. 2015 Dec;86(6):e278. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.002
  49. Lin JC, Patel A, Rogers CG. Robot-assisted removal of inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2020 Apr 15;6(2):311312. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.03.009
  50. Cheng G, Ni D, Liang H, Zhang X. Successful experiences and feasible techniques of robotic-assisted inferior vena cava filter retrieval after failure of endovascular attempts: a case report. Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):519523. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-513
  51. Gharagozloo F, Meyer M, Tempesta B, Gruessner S. Robotic transthoracic first-rib resection for Paget–Schroetter syndrome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;55(3):434439. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy275
  52. Reyes M, Alaparthi S, Roedl JB, et al. Robotic first rib resection in thoracic outlet syndrome: a systematic review of current literature. J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 23;12(20):6689. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206689
  53. Loverix L, Salihi RR, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, et al. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Apr;30(4):466472. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000961
  54. Meredith LT, Isch EL, Ali MI, Nooromid MJ, Okusanya OT. Technical considerations in robotic aberrant right subclavian artery resection for dysphagia lusoria. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2024 May 9;10(4):101525. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101525
  55. Garg H, Psutka SP, Hakimi AA, et al. A decade of robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2022 Sep;208(3):542560. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002829
  56. Kundavaram C, de Castro Abreu AL, Chopra S, et al. Advances in robotic vena cava tumor thrombectomy: intracaval balloon occlusion, patch grafting, and vena cavoscopy. Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):884890. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.024
  57. Matthew AN, Hampton LJ, Autorino R, Bhati CS. Evolution of robotic-assisted kidney transplant: successes and barriers to overcome. Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Jan;31(1):2936. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000834
  58. Emerson D, Catarino P, Rampolla R, Chikwe J, Megna D. Robotic-assisted lung transplantation: first in man. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jan;43(1):158161. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.019
  59. Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Ginesini M, et al. Tips and tricks for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric/portal vein resection and reconstruction. Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):32333245. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09860-0
  60. Fida Z, Ghutai G, Jamil Z, et al. The role of robotics in cardiac surgery: innovations, outcomes, and future prospects. Cureus. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):e74884. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74884
  61. Khaliel FH, Haq MI, Alsulbud AK, et al. “First-in-human” totally robotic orthotopic heart transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Jun;44(6):10001003. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2025.02.1685
  62. Thomaschewski M, Kist M, Zimmermann M, et al. Conception and prospective multicentric validation of a Robotic Surgery Training Curriculum (RoSTra(C) for surgical residents: from simulation via laboratory training to integration into the operation room. J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 27;18(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01813-6
  63. Kiely DJ, Gotlieb WH, Lau S, et al. Virtual reality robotic surgery simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing: a randomized controlled trial. J Robot Surg. 2015;9(3):179186. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0513-4
  64. Kiely DJ, Gotlieb WH, Lau S, et al. Virtual reality robotic surgery simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing: a randomized controlled trial. J Robot Surg. 2015 Sep;9(3):179186. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0513-4
  65. Bodenstedt S, Wagner M, Müller-Stich BP, Weitz J, Speidel S. Artificial intelligence-assisted surgery: potential and challenges. Visc Med. 2020 Dec;36(6):450455. doi: 10.1159/000511351
  66. Watson JB, Bavare C, Lumsden A, Lengyel B. DaVinci single port robot applications in the upper and lower extremities for vascular surgery: feasibility and technique. J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun;81(6):e82-e83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.160
  67. Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Torella F. Endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis of updated peri-operative and long-term data of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;59(3):385397. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.030
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1657 | Journal eISSN: 1947-6108
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 48
Submitted on: Jun 16, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 13, 2025
Published on: Oct 7, 2025
Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Jacob Watson, Alan Lumsden, Charudatta Bavare, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.