Dynamic Imaging of Aortic Pathologies: Review of Clinical Applications and Imaging Protocols
References
- Berczeli M, Chinnadurai P, Chang SM, Lumsden AB. Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging. J Vis Exp. 2021 Dec 9;(178). doi: 10.3791/62958
- Beeres M, Wichmann JL, Frellesen C, et al. ECG-gated Versus Non-ECG-gated High-pitch Dual-source CT for Whole Body CT Angiography (CTA). Acad Radiol. 2016 Feb;23(2):163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.003
- Berczeli M, Chinnadurai P, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, et al. Time-resolved, Cardiac-gated Computed Tomography After Endovascular Ascending Aortic and Arch Repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 May;113(5):1685-1691. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.054
- Osnabrugge RL, Mylotte D, Head SJ, et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;62(11):1002-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.015
- Roberts WC, Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 2005 Feb 22;111(7):920-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000155623.48408.C5
- Adriaans BP, Westenberg JJM, van Cauteren YJM, et al. Clinical assessment of aortic valve stenosis: Comparison between 4D flow MRI and transthoracic echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Feb;51(2):472-480. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26847
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e35-e71. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932
- Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
- Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000 Aug;21(16):1387-96. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2011
- Armstrong AC, Gidding S, Gjesdal O, Wu C, Bluemke DA, Lima JA. LV mass assessed by echocardiography and CMR, cardiovascular outcomes, and medical practice. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug;5(8):837-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.06.003
- Lombardi JV, Hughes GC, Appoo JJ, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):723-747. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.013
- Allen BD, Aouad PJ, Burris NS, et al. Detection and Hemodynamic Evaluation of Flap Fenestrations in Type B Aortic Dissection with 4D Flow MRI: Comparison with Conventional MRI and CTA. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2019 Apr;1(1):
e180009 . doi: 10.1148/ryct.2019180009 - Chen CW, Tseng YH, Lin CC, et al. Aortic dissection assessment by 4D phase-contrast MRI with hemodynamic parameters: the impact of stent type. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Feb;11(2):490-501. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-670
- Marlevi D, Sotelo JA, Grogan-Kaylor R, et al. False lumen pressure estimation in type B aortic dissection using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparisons with aortic growth. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 May 13;23(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00741-4
- Saitta S, Guo B, Pirola S, et al. Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Blood Flow on Tears in Type B Aortic Dissection With Different Morphologies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Oct 8;9:742985. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.742985
- Ruiz-Muñoz A, Guala A, Dux-Santoy L, et al. False lumen rotational flow and aortic stiffness are associated with aortic growth rate in patients with chronic aortic dissection of the descending aorta: a 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022 Mar 28;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12968-022-00852-6
- Kinner S, Eggebrecht H, Maderwald S, et al. Dynamic MR angiography in acute aortic dissection. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):505-14. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24788
- Akin I, Kische S, Ince H, Nienaber C. Penetrating aortic ulcer, intramural hematoma, acute aortic syndrome: when to do what. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012 Feb;53(1 Suppl 1):83-90.
- Harris JA, Bis KG, Glover JL, Bendick PJ, Shetty A, Brown OW. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the aorta. J Vasc Surg. 1994 Jan;19(1):90-8; discussion 98-9. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70124-5
- Evangelista A, Carro A, Moral S, et al. Imaging modalities for the early diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;10(8):477-86. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.92
- Nienaber CA. The role of imaging in acute aortic syndromes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jan;14(1):15-23. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes215
- Wu MT, Wang YC, Huang YL, et al. Intramural blood pools accompanying aortic intramural hematoma: CT appearance and natural course. Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):705-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101270
- Berczeli M, Chang SM, Lumsden AB, Chinnadurai P. Imaging aortic intramural hematoma with blood pools using time-resolved, dynamic computed tomography angiography. J Vasc Surg. 2022 Oct;76(4):1087-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.077
- Nguyen L, Cook SC. Coarctation of the Aorta: Strategies for Improving Outcomes. Cardiol Clin. 2015 Nov;33(4):521-30, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2015.07.011
- Hope MD, Meadows AK, Hope TA, et al. Clinical evaluation of aortic coarctation with 4D flow MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Mar;31(3):711-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22083
- Riesenkampff E, Fernandes JF, Meier S, et al. Pressure fields by flow-sensitive, 4D, velocity-encoded CMR in patients with aortic coarctation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Sep;7(9):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.03.017
- Abdulla R. Echocardiographic diagnosis of congenital heart disease: An embryologic and anatomic approach. Pediatr Cardiol. 1999 Sep;20(5):316. doi: 10.1007/s002469900476
- Rengier F, Delles M, Eichhorn J, et al. Noninvasive pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with unrepaired and repaired aortic coarctation. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014 Apr;4(2):97-103. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.03.03
- Burris NS, Hope MD. 4D flow MRI applications for aortic disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015 Feb;23(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2014.08.006
- Bürk J, Blanke P, Stankovic Z, et al. Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Dec 13;14(1):84. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-84
- Kauhanen SP, Hedman M, Kariniemi E, et al. Aortic dilatation associates with flow displacement and increased circumferential wall shear stress in patients without aortic stenosis: A prospective clinical study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jul;50(1):136-145. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26655
- Bieging ET, Frydrychowicz A, Wentland A, et al. In vivo three-dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Mar;33(3):589-97. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22485
- Golledge J, Muller J, Daugherty A, Norman P. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pathogenesis and implications for management. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Dec;26(12):2605-13. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000245819.32762.cb
- Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991 Nov;5(6):491-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02015271
- Lederle FA, Kyriakides TC, Stroupe KT, et al. Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 30;380(22):2126-2135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715955
- Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D, Sculpher MJ.; United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1863-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909305
- Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1607-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042002
- Marchiori A, von Ristow A, Guimaraes M, Schönholz C, Uflacker R. Predictive factors for the development of type II endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Jun;18(3):299-305. doi: 10.1583/10-3116.1
- Berczeli M, Chinnadurai P, Legeza P, et al. Dynamic, Time-Resolved CT Angiography After EVAR: A Quantitative Approach to Accurately Characterize Aortic Endoleak Type and Identify Inflow Vessels. J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Jan 23;15266028211070970. doi: 10.1177/15266028211070970
- Lehmkuhl L, Andres C, Lücke C, et al. Dynamic CT angiography after abdominal aortic endovascular aneurysm repair: influence of enhancement patterns and optimal bolus timing on endoleak detection. Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):890-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120197
- Hou K, Zhu T, Zhang W, et al. Dynamic Volumetric Computed Tomography Angiography Is a Preferred Method for Unclassified Endoleaks by Conventional Computed Tomography Angiography After Endovascular Aortic Repair. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8):
e012011 . doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012011 - Berczeli M, Chinnadurai P, Osztrogonácz P, et al. Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography is More Accurate in Diagnosing Endoleaks than Standard Triphasic Computed Tomography Angiography and Enables Targeted Embolization. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;88:318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.06.014
- Sträter A, Huber A, Rudolph J, et al. 4D-Flow MRI: Technique and Applications. Rofo. 2018 Nov;190(11):1025-1035. doi: 10.1055/a-0647-2021
- Sakata M, Takehara Y, Katahashi K, et al. Hemodynamic Analysis of Endoleaks After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair by Using 4-Dimensional Flow-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circ J. 2016 Jul 25;80(8):1715-25. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0297
- Katahashi K, Sano M, Takehara Y, et al. Flow dynamics of type II endoleaks can determine sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair using four-dimensional flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):107-116.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.048
- van der Laan MJ, Bakker CJ, Blankensteijn JD, Bartels LW. Dynamic CE-MRA for endoleak classification after endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Feb;31(2):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.08.014
- Shahid L, Rice J, Berhane H, et al. Enhanced 4D Flow MRI-Based CFD with Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Flow Dynamics Assessment in Coarctation of the Aorta. Ann Biomed Eng. 2022 Aug;50(8):1001-1016. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-02980-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1172 | Journal eISSN: 1947-6108
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 14
Submitted on: Dec 15, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 15, 2022
Published on: Mar 7, 2023
Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2023 Peter Osztrogonacz, Marton Berczeli, Ponraj Chinnadurai, Su-Min Chang, Dipan J. Shah, Alan B. Lumsden, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.