Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction Cover

Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Open Access
|Jan 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Definition of myocardial infarction.3,4

ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (STEMI)
The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, and World Heart Federation committee established the following electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria for STEMI:
  • New ST-segment elevation at the J point in two contiguous leads, with the cutoff point as > 0.1 mV in all leads other than V2 or V3

  • In leads V2–V3, the cutoff point is > 0.2 mV in men older than 40 years and > 0.25 mV in men younger than 40 years, and > 0.15 mV in women

A new left bundle branch block is considered a STEMI equivalent. Patients with a pre-existing left bundle branch block can be further evaluated using Scarbossa's criteria:
  • ST-segment elevation of 1 mm or more that is concordant with (in the same direction as) the QRS complex

  • ST-segment depression of 1 mm or more in lead V1, V2, or V3

  • ST-segment elevation of 5 mm or more that is discordant with (in the opposite direction) the QRS complex

NON–ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (NSTEMI)
NSTEMI is diagnosed in patients who have symptoms consistent with acute cardiogenic shock and troponin elevation but without ECG changes consistent with STEMI. Unstable angina and NSTEMI differ primarily in the presence or absence of detectable troponin leak. Myocardial injury is expected at troponin levels exceeding the 99th percentile upper reference limit, which is specified for each individual assay. Specific cutoffs can be found in manufacturers' package inserts, in peer-reviewed publications, and on the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine website.
Table 2.

Recent clinical trials evaluating treatment options in cardiogenic shock. IABP: intra-aortic balloon pump; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RRT: renal replacement therapy; SHOCK: Should we Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock trial; IABP-SHOCK II: Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock trial; IMPRESS: Impella Versus IABP Reduces Mortality in STEMI Patients Treated with Primary PCI in Severe Cardiogenic Shock trial; CULPRIT SHOCK: Culprit Lesion-Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock trial; DCSI: Detroit Cardiogenic Shock Initiative

TRIALYEARPATIENTSPATIENT POPULATIONTREATMENT ARMSPRIMARY END POINT(S)RESULTS
SHOCK1999302Shock due to left ventricular failure complicating myocardial infarctionEmergency revascularization or initial medical stabilization30-day all-cause mortalityNo significant difference in mortality between treatment groups (46.7% vs 56.0%; P = .11)
IABP – SHOCK II2012600Shock complicating acute myocardial infarctionIntra-aortic balloon counterpulsation or no intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation30-day all-cause mortalityNo significant difference in mortality between treatment groups (39.7% vs 41.3%; P = .69)
IMPRESS201648Severe shock complicating acute myocardial infarctionImpella CP or intra-aortic balloon pump30-day all-cause mortalityNo significant different in mortality between Impella CP and IABP (46% vs 50%, P = .96)
CULPRIT SHOCK2017706Shock presenting with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarctionCulprit-lesion-only PCI or immediate multivessel PCI30-day mortality and renal failure requiring RRTCulprit-lesion-only PCI was associated with slightly decreased risk of mortality (OR: 0.84, P = .03) compared to multivessel PCI, but the risk of RRT did not differ (OR: 0.71, P = .07)
DCSI201841Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shockSingle treatment arm of invasive hemodynamic monitoring and rapid initiation of non-IABP MCSSurvival to explant and change in CPOSurvival to explant was 85% vs 51% in historical controls (P < .001), and post-procedure CPO increased 67% compared to pre-procedure CPO (P < .001)
Table 3.

The Diamond-Forrester Classification for shock severity in acute myocardial infarction.12,13

CLASSCARDIAC INDEX (MM/MIN)PCWP (MM HG)MORTALITY (%)
I> 2< 183
II> 2> 189
III< 2< 1823
IV< 2> 1851
I> 2< 183
II> 2> 189
III< 2< 1823
IV< 2> 1851
Table 4.

The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions classification scheme.13 CS: cardiogenic shock; JVP: jugular venous pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; CVP: central venous pressure; PA sat: pulmonary artery saturation; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; MAP: mean arterial pressure; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; RAP: right atrial pressure; PAPI: pulmonary artery pulsatility index; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; LFT: liver function test; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; BiPaP: bilevel positive airway pressure

STAGEDESCRIPTIONPHYSICAL EXAM/BEDSIDE FINDINGSBIOCHEMICAL MARKERSHEMODYNAMICS
A At riskPatient is not currently experiencing signs or symptoms of CS but is at risk for its development. Patient may have large acute myocardial infarction or prior infarction and/or acute on chronic heart failure symptoms.
  • Normal JVP

  • Lung sounds clear

  • Warm and well perfused

  • Strong distal pulses

  • Normal mentation

  • Normal labs

  • Normal renal function

  • Normal lactic acid

Normotensive (SBP ⩾ 100 mm Hg or normal) If hemodynamics done:
  • Cardiac index ⩾ 2.5

  • CVP < 10 mm Hg

  • PA sat ⩾ 65%

B Beginning CSPatient has clinical evidence of relative hypotension or tachycardia without hypoperfusion.
  • Elevated JVP

  • Rales in lung fields

  • Warm and well perfused

  • Strong distal pulses

  • Normal mentation

  • Normal lactate

  • Minimal renal function impairment

  • Elevated BNP

SBP < 90 mm Hg or MAP < 60 mm Hg or > 30 mm Hg drop from baseline Pulse ≥ 100 If hemodynamics done:
  • Cardiac index ≥ 2.2

  • PA sat ⩾ 65%

C Classic CSPatient manifests with hypoperfusion that requires intervention (inotrope, pressor, or mechanical support, including ECMO) beyond volume resuscitation to restore perfusion. These patients typically present with relative hypotension.May include:
  • Looks unwell

  • Panicked

  • Ashen, mottled, dusky

  • Volume overload

  • Extensive rales

  • Killip class 3 or 4

  • BiPap or mechanical ventilation

  • Cold, clammy

  • Acute alteration in mental status

  • Urine output < 30 mL/h

May include:
  • Lactate ⩾ 2 mmol/L

  • Creatinine doubling or > 50% drop in GFR

  • Increased LFTs

  • Elevated BNP

May include: SBP < 90 mm Hg or MAP < 60 mm Hg or > 30 mm Hg drop from baseline and drugs/device used to maintain BP above these targets Hemodynamics:
  • Cardiac index < 2.2

  • PCWP > 15 mm Hg

  • RAP/PCWP ⩾ 0.8

  • PAPI < 1.85

  • Cardiac power output ⩽ 0.6 W

D Deteriorating/doomPatient is similar to category C but is getting worse and failing to respond to initial interventions.Any of stage CAny of Stage C and: deterioratingAny of Stage C and: requiring multiple pressors or addition of mechanical circulatory support devices to maintain perfusion
E ExtremisPatient is experiencing cardiac arrest with ongoing CPR and/or ECMO, being supported by multiple interventions.
  • Near pulselessness

  • Cardiac collapse

  • Mechanical ventilation

  • Defibrillator used

“Trying to die” CPR (A-modifier) pH ⩽ 7.2 Lactate ⩾ 5 mmol/L
  • No SBP without resuscitation

  • PEA or refractory VT/VF

  • Hypotension despite

  • maximal support

Figure 1.

Cardiogenic Shock Algorithm developed by the INOVA Heart and Vascular Institute. Republished with permission of Elsevier Science & Technology Journals, from Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock, Tehrani et al., 73(13), 2019.17

Language: English
Page range: 16 - 21
Published on: Jan 1, 2020
Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Navin K. Kapur, Katherine L. Thayer, Elric Zweck, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.