Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock

Maria M. Patarroyo Aponte; Carlos Manrique; Biswajit Kar

doi:10.14797/mdcj-16-1-50

Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock

Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal

Volume 16 (2020): Issue 1

By: Maria M. Patarroyo Aponte, Carlos Manrique and Biswajit Kar

Open Access

|Jan 2020

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock presents a significant challenge to the medical community, and there is much debate as to the best classification system and treatment mechanisms. As interventions and technologies improve, systems of care for patients with cardiogenic shock must evolve as well. This review describes the current treatment models for cardiogenic shock, including the “hub-and-spoke” model, and defines specific characteristics of the ideal system of care for this patient population.

References

van Diepen S Katz JN Albert NM American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Circulation 2017 Oct 17 136 16 e232 e268
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaroszewski DE Kleisli T Staley L A traveling team concept to expedite the transfer and management of unstable patients in cardiopulmonary shock J Heart Lung Transplant 2011 Jun 30 6 618 23
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hollenberg SM Kavinsky CJ Parrillo JE Cardiogenic shock Ann Intern Med 1999 Jul 6 131 1 47 59
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reynolds HR Hochman JS Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes Circulation 2008 Feb 5 117 5 686 97
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hochman JS Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm Circulation 2003 Jun 24 107 24 2998 3002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prondzinsky R Unverzagt S Lemm H Interleukin-6, -7, -8 and -10 predict outcome in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock Clin Res Cardiol 2012 May 101 5 375 84
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hochman JS Sleeper LA Webb JG Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med 1999 Aug 26 341 9 625 34
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baran DA Grines CL Bailey S SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019 Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019 Jul 1 94 1 29 37
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nohria A Tsang SW Fang JC Clinical assessment identifies hemodynamic profiles that predict outcomes in patients admitted with heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 May 21 41 10 1797 804
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harjola VP Lassus J Sionis A CardShock Study Investigators; GREAT network Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock Eur J Heart Fail 2015 May 17 5 501 9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Berg DD Bohula EA van Diepen S Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2019 Mar 12 3 e005618
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wayangankar SA Bangalore S McCoy LA Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016 Feb 22 9 4 341 51
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Celso B Tepas J Langland-Orban B A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems J Trauma 2006 Feb 60 2 371 8 discussion 378
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ganesh A Lindsay P Fang J Integrated systems of stroke care and reduction in 30-day mortality: A retrospective analysis Neurology 2016 Mar 8 86 10 898 904
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harris KM Strauss CE Duval S Multidisciplinary standardized care for acute aortic dissection: design and initial outcomes of a regional care model Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010 Jul 3 4 424 30
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jacobs AK Regional systems of care for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: being at the right place at the right time Circulation 2007 Aug 14 116 7 689 92
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nichol G Aufderheide TP Eigel B American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Advocacy Committee; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Regional systems of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A policy statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 2010 Feb 9 121 5 709 29
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ting HH Rihal CS Gersh BJ Regional systems of care to optimize timeliness of reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Mayo Clinic STEMI Protocol Circulation 2007 Aug 14 116 7 729 36
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jollis JG Al-Khalidi HR Roettig ML Regional Systems of Care Demonstration Project: American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator Circulation 2016 Aug 2 134 5 365 74
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Basir MB Schreiber T Dixon S Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018 Feb 15 91 3 454 61
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tehrani BN Truesdell AG Sherwood MW Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock J Am Coll Cardiol 2019 Apr 9 73 13 1659 69
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helman DN Morales DL Edwards NM Left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplant network improves survival after failed cardiotomy Ann Thorac Surg 1999 Oct 68 4 1187 94
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stevenson LW Pagani FD Young JB INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture J Heart Lung Transplant 2009 Jun 28 6 535 41
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rab T Ratanapo S Kern KB Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week J Am Coll Cardiol 2018 Oct 16 72 16 1972 80
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shaefi S O'Gara B Kociol RD Effect of cardiogenic shock hospital volume on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock J Am Heart Assoc 2015 Jan 5 4 1 e001462
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kahn JM Goss CH Heagerty PJ Kramer AA O'Brien CR Rubenfeld GD Hospital volume and the outcomes of mechanical ventilation. Hospital volume and the outcomes of mechanical ventilation N Engl J Med 2006 Jul 6 355 1 41 50
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ross JS Normand SL Wang Y Hospital volume and 30-day mortality for three common medical conditions N Engl J Med 2010 Mar 25 362 12 1110 8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Truesdell AG Tehrani B Singh R ‘Combat’ Approach to Cardiogenic Shock Interv Cardiol 2018 May 13 2 81 6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Granger CB Henry TD Bates WE Cercek B Weaver WD Williams DO Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (ST-elevation myocardial infarction-receiving) hospital perspective Circulation 2007 Jul 10 116 2 e55 9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henry TD Unger BT Sharkey SW Design of a standardized system for transfer of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction for percutaneous coronary intervention Am Heart J 2005 Sep 150 3 373 84
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Basir MB Schreiber TL Grines CL Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic Shock Am J Cardiol 2017 Mar 15 119 6 845 51
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kelley AS Morrison RS Palliative Care for the Seriously Ill N Engl J Med 2015 Aug 20 373 8 747 55
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Campbell ML Guzman JA Impact of a proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical ICU Chest 2003 Jan 123 1 266 71
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nakagawa S Garan AR Takeda K Palliative Care Consultation in Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Retrospective Cohort Study J Palliat Med 2019 Apr 22 4 432 6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vallabhajosyula S Prasad A Dunlay SM Utilization of Palliative Care for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 15-Year National Perspective on Trends, Disparities, Predictors, and Outcomes J Am Heart Assoc 2019 Aug 6 8 15 e011954
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marra A Ely EW Pandharipande PP Patel MB The ABCDEF Bundle in Critical Care Crit Care Clin 2017 Apr 33 2 225 43
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Major ME van Nes F Ramaekers S Engelbert RHH van der Schaaf M Survivors of Critical Illness and Their Relatives: A Qualitative Study on Hospital Discharge Experience Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019 Nov 16 11 1405 1413
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-16-1-50 | Journal eISSN: 1947-6108

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 50 - 56

Published on: Jan 1, 2020

Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

cardiogenic shock,

heart failure,

system of care

© 2020 Maria M. Patarroyo Aponte, Carlos Manrique, Biswajit Kar, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.

Volume 16 (2020): Issue 1