Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.
![Vertical hydraulic gradients (VHGs) [m · m−1] and dominant directions of water flow in hyporheic zone (HZ) at locations where water samples were taken for chemical analysis (marked with arrows).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647351904e662f30ba539f38/j_quageo-2026-0007_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKKDI2TCMI%2F20251216%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251216T212334Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEKT%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJIMEYCIQClPbzuogIa%2B6KcpN3LQQk27Ud7o%2BWuzT322LgizpZQtAIhAISxyCjec6A9cwsdJazmcKjzNgQAAgMQPK36jif7dbSYKrwFCG0QAhoMOTYzMTM0Mjg5OTQwIgzHcYlEc0ydgP0tDRgqmQUvWNJVvgVIF35aesCUQ7Od8lzDat5hvqR99IPhY49cfYTM8%2BV2LyEQtYI3DUFnopdQual0eGjcLJTFJlQSeKXZjMgI5SMBh0ShVDCP15lw74cX6JMQPHXN2ozaP2chO4LRYX6fyIMzWCsr1%2Bhq7YvEENHxvGt4gZyJdkpIhWCaFI3hNzHami%2FMzSETunlR5NNKc0SW1a%2B6zOjGmGJutICNVpi9AR0zlattx%2B2J%2BCl9bURjI9wvXCmMLym%2FbDl0aAaj8e4haFNnoGcVqjkJAO%2F7qgaJ7yJR1soGVDvgk314GqtWqRGKf66tZIvbXowByRtZEn2RSOG7n%2FAJhB7dzZ6kxmnsjRh3krIZZgUQDlf73aI0qakuz%2FX48RmSfP1uNOOfLokpbZu%2BsdQS9sEjLkffUpIQItKutfZacO8Slgwad23Bl7%2BA%2Bb%2BtzHsQk5aIeUCJ4OwEmNYxIInX%2F2ZNm5V83h3ktp0TdYLZu9%2FFczgq65Yp3NCcvoH7xhthBY4ouz3bt8erzhPL06k%2FlqW2Y9BNzSZvK50y97QY1mQ5yAlKLT%2FA1j8LUg5qoEt0lZrx%2BDiO6cleBv5kITVqxWPfGnZacJhKJCHkLw%2Fcn9Gjqv8SRBzwOoOggykyUH0ip096lIWbf0ERGEPyPS54gHfuuWhoWgA%2BfrlVi6n95rKHSKBeDjqjN4UxMRJGJw7MP%2BK0ToACclhL29c9a%2F43ub8YoknB8gP%2FyHXsZYaomO%2Fy4Bz82%2B4vZWf30i9AiV6W%2FOMgrbbz%2FaotuALCgwN4v9HQl1kVQU9kdbdhYh%2FTyFLQImvBUC1aDSBHupsu1ncywUqCGFOt2VM8fZfUaICo4UsypVWUnVhRXchWGbq2VNjepRjZ9wbIWLtBP8AR7jCQ6IbKBjqwAVxI4bP4N2XG4Eg9bHyN4EhjBr0vLOZwwV9iwyGmXLSoQ2ZvoSaGSAcPiTijVfd3MHKf9VSixGikV2Nxbp7pRxug33LvxCNpdQNdRZ2682AWqjx58sdwzdwTxSgfhC%2BZ704G5uds4pWvY4OudTJUo4xOBdNZ5MORjoyVhchrn7sCzBbPFuFpx5oKd0DIiTwLYD6lhgNcGAB1VVEny1mDkakUdh2d2OeiXX3E6glRZwH1&X-Amz-Signature=acb0133927205d5d64ab2719194e4f181ee8f6c8cf27c7ea61bf26ca4092587e&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.
![Comparison of laboratory-determined content of selected components in the hyporheic zone (HZ) waters with content calculated by hydrogeochemical models [mg · dm−3].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/647351904e662f30ba539f38/j_quageo-2026-0007_fig_005.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKKDI2TCMI%2F20251216%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251216T212334Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEKT%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJIMEYCIQClPbzuogIa%2B6KcpN3LQQk27Ud7o%2BWuzT322LgizpZQtAIhAISxyCjec6A9cwsdJazmcKjzNgQAAgMQPK36jif7dbSYKrwFCG0QAhoMOTYzMTM0Mjg5OTQwIgzHcYlEc0ydgP0tDRgqmQUvWNJVvgVIF35aesCUQ7Od8lzDat5hvqR99IPhY49cfYTM8%2BV2LyEQtYI3DUFnopdQual0eGjcLJTFJlQSeKXZjMgI5SMBh0ShVDCP15lw74cX6JMQPHXN2ozaP2chO4LRYX6fyIMzWCsr1%2Bhq7YvEENHxvGt4gZyJdkpIhWCaFI3hNzHami%2FMzSETunlR5NNKc0SW1a%2B6zOjGmGJutICNVpi9AR0zlattx%2B2J%2BCl9bURjI9wvXCmMLym%2FbDl0aAaj8e4haFNnoGcVqjkJAO%2F7qgaJ7yJR1soGVDvgk314GqtWqRGKf66tZIvbXowByRtZEn2RSOG7n%2FAJhB7dzZ6kxmnsjRh3krIZZgUQDlf73aI0qakuz%2FX48RmSfP1uNOOfLokpbZu%2BsdQS9sEjLkffUpIQItKutfZacO8Slgwad23Bl7%2BA%2Bb%2BtzHsQk5aIeUCJ4OwEmNYxIInX%2F2ZNm5V83h3ktp0TdYLZu9%2FFczgq65Yp3NCcvoH7xhthBY4ouz3bt8erzhPL06k%2FlqW2Y9BNzSZvK50y97QY1mQ5yAlKLT%2FA1j8LUg5qoEt0lZrx%2BDiO6cleBv5kITVqxWPfGnZacJhKJCHkLw%2Fcn9Gjqv8SRBzwOoOggykyUH0ip096lIWbf0ERGEPyPS54gHfuuWhoWgA%2BfrlVi6n95rKHSKBeDjqjN4UxMRJGJw7MP%2BK0ToACclhL29c9a%2F43ub8YoknB8gP%2FyHXsZYaomO%2Fy4Bz82%2B4vZWf30i9AiV6W%2FOMgrbbz%2FaotuALCgwN4v9HQl1kVQU9kdbdhYh%2FTyFLQImvBUC1aDSBHupsu1ncywUqCGFOt2VM8fZfUaICo4UsypVWUnVhRXchWGbq2VNjepRjZ9wbIWLtBP8AR7jCQ6IbKBjqwAVxI4bP4N2XG4Eg9bHyN4EhjBr0vLOZwwV9iwyGmXLSoQ2ZvoSaGSAcPiTijVfd3MHKf9VSixGikV2Nxbp7pRxug33LvxCNpdQNdRZ2682AWqjx58sdwzdwTxSgfhC%2BZ704G5uds4pWvY4OudTJUo4xOBdNZ5MORjoyVhchrn7sCzBbPFuFpx5oKd0DIiTwLYD6lhgNcGAB1VVEny1mDkakUdh2d2OeiXX3E6glRZwH1&X-Amz-Signature=021c47a0e16e0fffc6e7f5a2741be4c4735d9744240cd352c0be3f6000a9eb2d&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Characteristics of the hyporheic exchange flow (HEF)_
| Parameters | Average distance | Minimal distance | Maximal distance | Standard deviation | Average travel time to drainage zone | Average velocity | Percentage of the river length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [m] | [a] | [m a−1] | [%] | ||||
| All paths | 389.48 | 10.57 | 1117.49 | 307.88 | 20.24 | 19.24 | 55.24 |
| Paths within Ner River drainage zone (light green in Fig. 4) | 143.42 | 10.57 | 566.88 | 138.23 | 12.86 | 11.15 | 29.41 |
| Paths to groundwater intake (dark green in Fig. 4) | 669.64 | 408.41 | 1117.49 | 183.13 | 28.63 | 23.39 | 25.83 |