Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Opportunities for the Development of a Borderland Rural Territory: A Case Study of the Hlučín Region

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Al-Qawasmi J., 2020. Measuring quality of life in urban areas: Toward an integrated approach. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources 25(2): 556158. DOI 10.19080/IJESNR.2020.25.556158.
  2. Andersson A., Höjgård S., Rabinowicz E., 2017. Evaluation of results and adaptation of EU rural development programmes. Land Use Policy 67: 298–314. DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.002.
  3. Binar A., 2014. Hospodářský a sociální vývoj Hlučínska v letech 1945-1989 (Economic and social development of the Hlučín region between 1945 and 1989). Slezská universita, Opava: 328.
  4. Bogdanov N., Meredith D., Efstratoglu S., 2008. A typology of rural areas in Serbia. Economic Annals 53: 7–29. DOI 10.2298/EKA081770078.
  5. Brennan M.A., Flint C.G., Luloff A.E., 2009. Bringing together local culture and rural development: Findings from Ireland, Pennsylvania and Alaska. Sociologia Ruralis 49: 97–112. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00471.x.
  6. Casadio Tarabusi E., Guarini G., 2013. An unbalance adjustment method for development indicators. Social Indicators Research 112: 19–45. DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-0070-4.
  7. Černikovský L., Krejčí B., Bležek Z., Volná V., 2016. Transboundary air-pollution transport in the Czech-Polish border region between the cities of Ostrava and Katowice. Central European Journal of Public Health 24(Suppl.): S45-S50. DOI 10.21101/cejph.a4532.
  8. Dąbrowski M., 2014. Towards place-based regional and local development strategies in Central and Eastern Europe? EU cohesion policy and strategic planning capacity at the sub-national level. Local Economy 29(4-5): 378–393. DOI 10.1177/0269094214535715.
  9. Dax T., Fischer M., 2018. An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline. European Planning Studies 26(2): 297–315. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361596.
  10. Florida R., 2002. The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New York.
  11. Furmankiewicz M., Janc K., Macken-Walsh Á., 2021. Implementation of the EU LEADER programme at member-state level: Written and unwritten rules of local project selection in rural Poland. Journal of Rural Studies 86: 357–365. DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.020.
  12. Gerber J.F., 2020. Degrowth and critical agrarian studies. The Journal of Peasant Studies 47(2): 235–264. DOI 10.1080/03066150.2019.1695601.
  13. Guinjoan E., Badia A., Tulla A.F., 2016. The new paradigm of rural development. Theoretical considerations and reconceptualization using the “rural web”. Bolletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 71: 495–500.
  14. Heffner K., Latocha A., 2020. Desolated villages as examples of spatial, economic and social marginalization in the Polish-Czech borderland and their current transformations. In: Nel E., Pelc S. (eds), Responses to geographical marginality and marginalization. Perspectives on Geographical Marginality 5. Springer, Cham. 123–142. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-51342-9_8.
  15. Ioppolo G., Cucurachi S., Salomone R., Saija G., Shi L., 2016. Sustainable local development and environmental governance: A strategic planning experience. Sustainability 8: 180. DOI 10.3390/su8020180.
  16. Jiřík V., Machaczka O., Miturová H., Tomášek I., Šlachtová H., Janoutová J., Velická H., Janout V., 2016. Air pollution and potential health risk in Ostrava region – a review. Central European Journal of Public Health 24(Suppl.): S4–S17. DOI 10.21101/cejph.a4533.
  17. Jung J., Neminář J., 2017. Who are the people in the Hlučín region. Hlučín: Regional Museum.
  18. Kajdanek K., Latocha A., Sikorski D., Tomczak P., Szmytkie R., Miodońska P., 2022. Recent transformation of marginal rural areas in the Sudetes mountains in Poland — drivers and effects of changes in perception of their inhabitants. Rural Sociology 87: 1155–1190. DOI 10.1111/ruso.12454.
  19. Konečný O., 2019. The leader approach across the European Union: One method of rural development, many forms of implementation. European Countryside 11(1): 1–16. DOI 10.2478/euco-2019-0001.
  20. Kubátová H., 2016. Collective memory and collective identity of Hlučín region inhabitants in the 20th century. Historická sociologie 8(1): 11–32. DOI 10.14712/23363525.2016.1.
  21. Lind N., 2019. A development of the human development index. Social Indicators Research 146(3): 409–423. DOI 10.1007/s11205-019-02133-9.
  22. MacKinnon D., 2008. Evolution, path dependence and economic geography. Geography Compass 2: 1449–1463. DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00148.x.
  23. Maler K., 2015. Kulturkampf na obsarze ołomunickiego komisariatu arcybiskupskiego z siedzbą w Kietrzu (1871-1878) (Kulturkampf in the territory of Olomouc archbishop commissariat in Głubczyce county with its registered office in Kietrz (1871-1878)). Wrocławski Przegląd Teologiczny 23(2): 255–268. DOI 10.34839/wpt.2015.23.2.255-268.
  24. Mečiar M., 2017. Migration, displacement and adaptation. Historical perspective and the present. In: Sükrü A., Cinemre C. (eds), Current debates in sociology and anthropology. IJOPEC Publication, London : 67–84.
  25. Menconi M.E., Artemi S., Borghi P., Grohmann D., 2018. Role of local action groups in improving the sense of belonging of local communities with their territories. Sustainability 10: 4681. DOI 10.3390/su10124681.
  26. Michalska-Żyła A., Marks-Krzyszkowska M., 2018. Quality of life and quality of living in rural communes in Poland. European Countryside 10(2): 280–299. DOI 10.2478/euco-2018-0017.
  27. Mitrică B., Şerban P., Mocanu I., Grigorescu I., Damian N., Dumitraşcu M., 2020. Social development and regional disparities in the rural areas of Romania: Focus on the social disadvantaged areas. Social Indicators Research 152: 67–89. DOI 10.1007/s11205-020-02415-7.
  28. Noguera J., Ortega-Reig M., del Alcázar H., Copus, A., Berlina A., Moodle J., Mantino F., Forcina B., Weck S., Beißwenger S., Hans N., Tagai S., Koós B., Kovács K., Uzzoli A., Dax T., Machold I., Schürmann C., Tobiasz-Lis P., Dmochowska-Dudek K., Wójcik M. 2017. Processes, features and cycles of inner peripheries in Europe [final report]. ESPON, Luxembourg.
  29. Novotný L., Hruška V., Egyedy T., Mazur M., 2015. Defining rural areas in Visegrád countries. Studia obszarów wiejskich 39: 21–34. DOI 10.7162/SOW.39.2.
  30. Pahl R.E., 1966. The rural-urban continuum. Sociologia Ruralis 6(3): 299–329. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1966.tb00537.x.
  31. Perlín R., 2010. Theoretical approaches and methods to delimitate rural and urban areas. European Countryside 2(4): 182–200. DOI 10.2478/v10091-010-0013-5.
  32. Pollermann K., Fynn L.L., Schwarze S., 2021. What are favouring conditions for the implementation of innovative projects in community-led local development (CLLD) approaches? In: Structural change in rural and urban economies (not paged). Leibniz Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Kiel.
  33. Rinaldi F.M., 2016. From local development policies to strategic planning — assessing continuity in institutional coalitions. Evaluation and Program Planning 56: 76–87. DOI 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.03.008.
  34. Rivera M., Knickel K., María Díaz-Puente J., Afonso A., 2019. The role of social capital in agricultural and rural development: Lessons learnt from case studies in seven countries. Sociologia Ruralis 59: 66–91. DOI 10.1111/soru.12218.
  35. Rodriguez M., Sanchez L.M., Cejudo E., Camacho J.A., 2019. Variety in local development strategies and employment: LEADER programme in Andalusia. Agricultural Economics – Czech 65: 43–50. DOI 10.17221/106-2018-AGRICECON.
  36. Servillo L., 2019. Tailored polities in the shadow of the state’s hierarchy. The CLLD implementation and a future research agenda. European Planning Studies 27(4): 678–698. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2019.1569595.
  37. Szmytkie R., Tomczak P., 2017. Revival of rural settlements in Kłodzko land. Geographia Polonica 90(3): 319–333. DOI 10.7163/GPol.0097.
  38. Vaishar A., Štastná M., 2021. Accessibility of services in rural areas: Southern Moravia case study. Sustainability 13: 9103. DOI 10.3390/su13169103.
  39. Vaishar A., Vidovićová L., Figueiredo E., 2018. Quality of rural life. Editorial. European Countryside 10(2): 180–190. DOI 10.2478/euco-2018-0011.
  40. Wiskermann E., 1938. Czechs and Germans. A study of the struggle in the historic provinces of Bohemia and Moravia. Oxford University Press, London.
  41. Woods M., 2010. Rural (1st ed.). Routledge, London: 352. DOI 10.4324/9780203844304.
  42. Wosiek M., 2020. Rural-urban divide in human capital in Poland after 1988. Oeconomia Copernicana 11(1): 183–201. DOI 10.24136/oc.2020.008.
  43. Zasada I., Weltin M., Reutter M., Verburg P.H., Piorr A. 2018. EU’s rural development policy at the regional level – Are expenditures for natural capital linked with territorial needs? Land Use Policy 77: 344–353. DOI 10.1016/j.lan-dusepol.2018.05.053.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2023-0036 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 106
Submitted on: Jan 14, 2023
Published on: Dec 20, 2023
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2023 Milada Šťastná, Antonín Vaishar, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.