The Role of Geomorphosites in the Local Economy Development of the Carpathian and Sub-Carpathian Area of Vrancea County, Romania

Tufănoiu, Ionuț

The Role of Geomorphosites in the Local Economy Development of the Carpathian and Sub-Carpathian Area of Vrancea County, Romania

Quaestiones Geographicae

Volume 42 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

By:

Ionuț Tufănoiu

Open Access

|Feb 2023

References

Arouca Declaration, 2011. International congress of Geotourism, Arouca Geopark, Portugal 9–13 November 2011. Online: https://www.europeangeoparks.org/?p=223.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barbălată L., Comănescu L., 2021. Environmental sustainability and the inclusion of geomorphosites in tourist activity – case study: The Baiului Mountains, Romania. Sustainability 13(14): 8094. DOI 10.3390/su13148094.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brilha J., 2018. Geoheritage: Inventories and evaluation. Geoheritage. Assessment, Protection, and Management, Elsevier: 69–85. DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00004-6.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bruschi V.M., Cendrero A., 2005. Geosite evaluation; can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario 18(1): 293–306.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Comănescu L., Nedelea A., 2010. Analysis of some representative geomorphosites in the Bucegi Mountains: Between scientific evaluation and tourist perception. Area 42(4): 406–416. DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00937.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Comănescu L., Nedelea A., Dobre R., 2011. The evaluation of geomorphosites from the Ponoare protected area. Forum Geografic 11(1): 54–61. DOI 10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2012.037.i.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coratza P., Giusti C., 2005. Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario 18(1): 307–313.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dowling R.K., 2015. Geotourism. In: Cater C., Garrod B., Low T. (eds.), The encyclopedia of sustainable tourism. CABI, Oxford: 231–232.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drăghici C.C., Pintilii R.D., Peptenatu D., Comănescu L.G., Sirodoev I., 2015. The role of SPA tourism in the development of local economies from Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance 23: 1573–1577. DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00400-1.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Economic data source: Project UB no. 10681/2021, Research Centre for Integrated Analysis and Territorial Management, 2022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Erhatic B., 2010. Geomorphosite assessment. Acta Geographica Slovenica 50(2): 296–309. DOI 10.3986/AGS50206.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garofano M., 2012. Challenges in the popularization of the earth sciences. Geotourism as a new medium for the geology dissemination. Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias-UFRJ 35(1): 34–41. DOI 10.11137/2012_1_34_41.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grandgirard V., 1999. L’evaluation des geotopes. Geologia Insubrica 4(1): 59–66.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gray M., 2018. Geodiversity: The backbone of geoheritage and geoconservation. Geoheritage. Assessment, Protection, and Management, Elsevier: 13–25. DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00001-0.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grecu A., Gruia A.K., Marin M., Bănuță M., Olteanu C., Constantin I., Gadoiu M., Teodorescu C., Dobrea C.R., Drăghici C.C., 2019. Specificity of sustainable structural dynamics of local economy in Romanian tourist resorts. Sustainability 11: 1–21. DOI 10.3390/su11247155.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hose T.A., 1995. Selling the story of Brain's stone. Enviromental Interpretation 10(2): 16–17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kavaliauske M., Kocyte R., 2014. Sustainable tourism development in Neringa region. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 156: 208–212. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.174.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kubalikova L., 2013. Geomorphosite assessment for Geotourism purposes. Czech Journal of Tourism 2(2): 80–104. DOI 10.2478/cjot-2013-0005.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lima F.F., Brilha J., Salamuni E., 2010. Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: A methodological proposal applied to brazil. Geoheritage 2: 91–99. DOI 10.1007/s12371-010-0014-9.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Necheș I.M., Erdeli G., 2015. Geolandscapes and Geotourism: Integrating nature and culture in the Bucegi Mountains of Romania. Landscape Research 40(4): 486–509. DOI 10.1080/01426397.2014.939616.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Newsome D., Dowling R., 2018. Geoheritage and Geotourism. Geoheritage. Assessment, Protection, and Management, Elsevier: 305–321. DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00017-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nica E., Sima V., Gheorghe I., Drugau-Constantin A., Mirica (Dumitrescu) C.O., 2018. Analysis of regional disparities in Romania from an entrepreneurial perspective. Sustainability 10(10): 1–21. DOI 10.3390/su10103450.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pal M., Albert G., 2021. Examining the spatial variability of geosite assessment and its relevance in geosite management. Geoheritage 13(8): 1–15. DOI 10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Panizza M., 2001. Geomorphosites: Concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chinese Science Bulletin 46: 4–5. DOI 10.1007/BF03187227.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Panizza M., Piacente S., 2003. Geomorfologia Culturale. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pereira P., Pereira D., Caetano Alves M.I., 2007. Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica 62(3): 159–169. DOI 10.5194/gh-62-159-2007.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pralong J.P., 2005. A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Geomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 3(3/2005): 189–196. DOI 10.4000/geomorphologie.350.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ren T., Can M., Paramati S.R., Fang J., Wu W., 2019. The impact of tourism quality on economic development and environment: Evidence from Mediterranean countries. Sustainability 11(8): 2296. DOI 10.3390/su11082296.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reynard E., 2005, Geomorphosites et paysages. Geomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 3: 181–188. DOI 10.4000/geomorphologie.338.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reynard E., Fontana G., Kozlik L., Scapozza C., 2007. A method for assessing “scientific” and “additional values” of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62(3): 148–158. DOI 10.5194/gh-62-148-2007.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reynard E., Panizza M., 2005. Geomophosites: Definition, assessment and mapping. An introduction. Geomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 3: 177–180. DOI 10.4000/geomorphologie.337.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reynard E., Perret A., Bussard J., Grangier L., Martin S., 2015. Integrated approach for the inventory and management of geomorphological heritage at the regional scale. Geoheritage 8: 43–60. DOI 10.1007/s12371-015-0153-0.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roman F., 1989. Munții Vrancei. Ghid turistic, ed. Sport – Turism, Bucharest.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Serrano E., Gonzalez-Trueba J.J., 2005. Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: The Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Geomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement 3: 197–208. DOI 10.4000/geomorphologie.364.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stoffelen A., Vanneste D., 2015. An integrative Geotourism approach: Bridging conflicts in tourism landscape research. Tourism Geographies 17(4): 544–560. DOI 10.1080/14616688.2015.1053973.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tufănoiu I., Simion A., Mărunțelu A., Teriș B., Grecu A., 2020. The geomorphosites assessment for determinating the Geotourism potential. Case study on the Natural Park Putna-Vrancea Romania. International Scientific Conference Geobalcanica Proceedings: 499–512. DOI 10.18509/GBP.2020.56.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vivek V., Saranya S., Chandrasekar K., 2020. Tourism development and fundamentals to promote sustainopreneurship in tourism industry. Our Heritage 68: 10598–10603.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vujičić M.D., Vasiljević D.A., Marković S.B., Hose T.A., Lukić T., Hadžić O., Janićević S., 2011. Preliminary geosite assessment model (gam) and its application on Fruska Gora Mountain, potential Geotourism destination of Serbia. Acta Geographica Slovenica: 51–2: 361–377. DOI 10.3986/AGS51303.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
World Travel & Tourism Council., 2019. Travel & Tourism Global Economic Impact & Trends. Online: https://wttc.org (accessed 12 May 2022).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yolal M., 2012. Geotourism and Geoparks: The case of Kizilcahamam-Çamlidere Geopark. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites 10: 193–203.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article