Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dependent Market Economies and Hierarchical Market Economies and their National Innovation Systems: The Case of Poland and Mexico Cover

Dependent Market Economies and Hierarchical Market Economies and their National Innovation Systems: The Case of Poland and Mexico

Open Access
|Apr 2019

References

  1. 1. Aoki, M. (1994). The Contingent Governance of Teams: An Analysis of Institutional Complementarity. International Economic Review, vol. 35, p. 657–676.10.2307/2527079
  2. 2. Barcikowska, R. (2017). Innovation in Social-Economic Development in Poland. Research Institutes as Entities and Contractors of Innovative Activities in Poland. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations. Vol. 25 (3), p. 103–116.
  3. 3. Borges-Quinones, M. and Saucedo-Acosta, E.J. (2018). El engranaje institucional como elemento del enfoque sistemático de la innovación en Latinoamerica. Ciencia UAT. Vol. 12, (2), p. 78–89.
  4. 4. Cámara de Diputados México, (2018). http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ (18/05/18).
  5. 5. Díaz, Á., (2008). América Latina y el Caribe: La propiedad intelectual después de los tratados de libre comercio, Santiago de Chile: CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/2526/S0600728_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (01/04/18)
  6. 6. Fernández, I. (2010). Institucionalidad pública desconcentrada y gobernanza territorial en Chile: desafíos para el desarrollo territorial equitativo. In Barbieri, M y Zurbriggen, C. (Coord.) Acción colectiva, Gobierno y Territorio: experiencias Cono Sur. (pp. 81–106). Flacso: Montevideo. http://web.flacso.edu.uy/assets/acci%C3%B3n-colectiva-gobierno-y--territorio.-flacso-uy.pdf. (20.05.2018).
  7. 7. Ginebra, X., (2008), La propiedad industrial y la competencia económica en México, Boletín Méxicano de Derecho Comparado. UNAM, no. 121, pages. 117–171. https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derechocomparado/article/view/3961/5021 (20/05/18).
  8. 8. Hall, P., Soskice, D. (2001). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: Hall, P., Soskice, D. (Eds.). Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Vol. 1, pp. 1–68), Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247757.001.0001
  9. 9. Jankowska, B., Matysek-Jedrych, A., Mroczek-Dabrowska, K. (2017). Efficiency of National Innovation Systems — Poland and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index. Comparative Economic Research, Vol. 20 (3), p. 77–94.10.1515/cer-2017-0021
  10. 10. Lundvall, B. (Ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
  11. 11. Natera, A. (2004). La noción de Gobernanza como gestión pública participativa y reticular. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III.
  12. 12. Natera, A. (2005). La gobernanza como modo emergente de gobierno y gestión pública. Revista Gestión y Análisis de las políticas públicas. No. 33–34, p. 53–65.10.24965/gapp.vi33-34.391
  13. 13. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.) (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. 14. Nölke, A., Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism. The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, Vol. 61 (4), p. 670–702.
  15. 15. North, D. (1992). Institutions and economic theory. American Economist, vol. 36, p. 3–6.10.1177/056943459203600101
  16. 16. Rodrik, D. (2007). One Economics Many Recipes. Globalization, Institutions and economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829354
  17. 17. Prats, J. (2005).? Qué es la gobernanza?. Revista Internacional de Gobernabilidad para el Desarrollo Humano. N° 17. Institut Internacional de Governabilitat de Catalunya
  18. 18. Rullan-Rosanis, S., Casanova, L. (2016). A review of the Mexican National Innovation System. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, Vol. 8, p. 59–68.
  19. 19. Schneider, B. (2009). Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol. 41 (3), p. 553–575.10.1017/S0022216X09990186
  20. 20. Schumpeter, J. (1943). Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.
  21. 21. The Economist Unit, (2018). Democracy index. https://www.eiu.com/home.aspx (20.05 2018).
  22. 22. Transparency International (2018). Corruption perception index 2017. https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017 (20.05 2018).
  23. 23. Torre, V. (2010). Problemas de precios de transferencia de bienes intangibles en las empresas multinacionales. Boletín Méxicano de Derecho Comparado, UNAM, no. 128., s. 845–893. https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derechocomparado/article/view/ 4628/5968) (28.04.2018).
  24. 24. World Justice Project (2018). Rule of law index 2017–2018. https://worldjusticeproject.org (18.05.2018).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14611/minib.30.12.2018.18 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8414 | Journal ISSN: 2353-8503
Language: English
Page range: 157 - 184
Published on: Apr 6, 2019
Published by: ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Edgar J. Saucedo-Acosta, María Teresa Montalvo Romero, Luis Fernando Villafuerte Valdés, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.