References
- 1. Armstrong, G., Kotler, P. (2012). Marketing: wprowadzenie. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
- 2. Bauer, H. H. (2013). Three Stages of Modern Science. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 27 (3), 505-513.
- 3. Boardman, P.C., Ponomariov, B.L. (2009). University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, 29 (2), 142-53.10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.008
- 4. Bourliaguet, B. (2016). A Weberian Approach to the Ethos of Science. Theory of Science, 38, 113-128.10.46938/tv.2016.330
- 5. Bucchi, M. (2015). Norms, competition and visibility in contemporary science: The legacy of Robert K. Merton. Journal of Classical Sociology, 15 (3), 233-252.10.1177/1468795X14558766
- 6. Dabic, M., González-Loureiro, M., Daim, T.U. (2015). Unraveling the attitudes on entrepreneurial universities: The case of Croatian and Spanish universities. Technology in Society, 42, 167-178.10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.007
- 7. Enebakk, V. (2007). The Three Merton Theses. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7 (2), 221-238.10.1177/1468795X07078040
- 8. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27, 823-33.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
- 9. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, Ch., Terra, B.R.C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
- 10. Ferris, G.R., Perrewe, P.L., Anthony, W.P., Gilmore, D.C. (2000). Political Skill at Work. Organizational Dynamics, 28 (4), 25-37.10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00007-3
- 11. Ferris, G.R., Treadway, D.C., Perrewe, P.L., Brouer, R.L., Douglas, C., Lux, S. (2007). Political Skill in Organizations. Journal of Management, 33 (3), 290-320.
- 12. Goodell, R. (1977). The Visible Scientists. Boston: Little Brown.
- 13. Heller, M., Eisenberg, R. (1998). Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280, 698-701.10.1126/science.280.5364.698
- 14. Huff, T.E. (2007). Some Historical Roots of the Ethos of Science. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7 (2), 193-210.10.1177/1468795X07078037
- 15. Instytut Zachodni (2012). Badanie potrzeb wielkopolskich przedsiębiorców w zakresie współpracy ze sferą B+R. Poznań: Instytut Zachodni.
- 16. Issitt, M. (2016). Personal branding. Salem Press Encyclopedia.
- 17. Jain, S., George, G., Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38, 922-935.10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007
- 18. Kalleberg, R. (2007). A Reconstruction of the Ethos of Science. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7 (2), 137-160.10.1177/1468795X07078033
- 19. Kaymaz, K., Eryigit, K. Y. (2011). Determining Factors Hindering University-Industry Collaboration: An Analysis from the Perspective of Academicians in the Context of Entrepreneurial Science Paradigm. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 4 (1), 185-213.
- 20. Knuuttila, T. (2012). Contradiction of Commercialization: Revealing the Norms of Science? Philosophy of Science, 79, 833-844.10.1086/667844
- 21. Kohring, M., Marcinkowski, F., Linder, Ch., Karis, S. (2013). Media orientation of German university decision makers and the executive influence of public relations. Public Relations Review, 39, 171-177.10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.01.002
- 22. Krimsky, Sh. (2006). Autonomy, Disinterest, and Entrepreneurial Science. Society, May/June, 22-29.10.1007/BF02687531
- 23. Kwiek, M. (2015a). Młoda kadra: różnice międzypokoleniowe w pracy naukowej i produktywności badawczej. Czym Polska różni się od Europy Zachodniej? Center for Public Policy Studies, Research Papers Series (CPP RPS), 87, 1-46.
- 24. Kwiek, M. (2015b). Słowo wstępne: W obliczu nadchodzącej fali reform szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce. Argumentacja i wizja wspierająca najważniejsze kierunki zmian. Nauka i szkolnictwo wyższe, 2 (46), 7-16.10.14746/nsw.2015.2.0
- 25. Lam, A. (2010). From 'ivory tower traditionalists' to 'entrepreneurial scientists'?: Academic scientists in fuzzy university-industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40, 307-340.10.1177/0306312709349963
- 26. Maiväli, Ü. (2015). Interpreting Biomedical Science: Experiment, Evidence, and Belief. Amsterdam-Boston-Heidelberg-London-New York-Oxford-Paris-San Diego-San Francisco-Singapore-Sydney-Tokyo: Academic Press.
- 27. Mauss, M. (1990). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London- New York: Routledge.
- 28. Merton, R.K. (1942). A Note on Science and Democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115-126.
- 29. Merton, R.K. (1974). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
- 30. Merton, R.K. (2002). Teoria socjologiczna i struktura społeczna. Warszawa: PWN.
- 31. Mittelstrass, J. (2012). Science and values: on values and credibility in science and scholarship. Rendiconti Lincei, 23 (suppl. 1), 29-33.10.1007/s12210-012-0201-5
- 32. Niedzicki, W. (2017). Jak prezentować naukę. In: N. Osica, W. Niedzicki, Sztuka promocji nauki. Praktyczny poradnik dla naukowców (67-181). Warszawa: OPI PIB.
- 33. Nowotny, H. (2006). Real science is excellent science - how to interpret post-academic science, Mode 2 and the ERC. Comment. Journal of Science Communication, 5 (4), 1-3.10.22323/2.05040304
- 34. OPI PIB, Millward Brown (2014). Ewaluacja instrumentów wsparcia B+R w ramach perspektywy finansowej 2007-2013. Raport końcowy z badania ewaluacyjnego opracowany dla Ministerstwa Infrastruktury i Rozwoju. Warszawa: OPI PIB, Millward Brown.
- 35. Osica, N. (2017). Jak promować naukę. In: N. Osica, W. Niedzicki, Sztuka promocji nauki. Praktyczny poradnik dla naukowców (7-66). Warszawa: OPI PIB.
- 36. Poznańska, K., Zarzecki, M., Matuszewski, P., Rudowski, A. (2012). Innowacyjność przedsiębiorstw na Mazowszu oraz współpraca ze szkołami wyższymi. Warszawa: Politechnika Warszawska.
- 37. Radder, H. (2010). Mertonian Values, Scientific Norms, and the Commodification of Academic Research. In: H. Radder (ed.), The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University (231-258). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- 38. Reunes, G. (2013). Branding yourself: a necessity? An analysis of the perceptions of young professionals towards the concept of „personal branding”. Gandawa: Universiteit Gent.
- 39. Rodriguez, V. (2007). Merton and Ziman's modes of science; the case of biological and similar material transfer agreements. Science and Public Policy, 34 (5), 355-363.10.3152/030234207X228575
- 40. Shepherd, I.D.H. (2005). From Cattle and Coke to Charlie: Meeting the Challenge of Self Marketing and Personal Branding. Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 589-606.10.1362/0267257054307381
- 41. Weingart, P. (1998). Science and the media. Research Policy, 27, 869-879.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00096-1
- 42. Ziman, J.M. (1996a). Postacademic Science: Constructing Knowledge with Networks an Norms. Science Studies, 1, 67-80.10.23987/sts.55095
- 43. Ziman, J. (1996b). Is Science Losing Its Objectivity? Nature, 382, 751-754.10.1038/382751a0
- 44. Ziman, J.M. (2000). Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511541391