Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of the Spherical Fuzzy Dematel Model for Assessing the Drone Apps Issues Cover

Application of the Spherical Fuzzy Dematel Model for Assessing the Drone Apps Issues

Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems
Volume 17 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)
By: Mamta Pandey,  Ratnesh Litoriya and  Prateek Pandey  
Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. P. A. Devi, C. I. Priyadarshini, C. Avvari. “Design of folded wing mechanism for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV),” Materialstoday. 2022. Proceedings in press, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.660.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. S. Bhusal, M. Karkee, U. Bhattarai, Y. Majeed, and Q. Zhang, K. “Automated execution of a pest bird deterrence system using a programmable unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV),” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 198, 106972.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. N. Eleftheroglou, S. Mansouri, T. Loutas, P. Karvelis, G. Georgoulas, G. Nikolakopoulos, D. Zarouchas. “Intelligent data-driven prognostic methodologies for the real-time remaining useful life until the end-of-discharge estimation of the Lithium-Polymer batteries of unmanned aerial vehicles with uncertainty quantification,” Applied Energy, 2019, 254, 113677.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. S. G. Bolanos, A. Q. Roman, and G. E. Alvarado. “Low-cost UAV applications in dynamic tropical volcanic landforms,” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2021, 410, 107143.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. G. Wang, Y. Han, X. Li, P. Chen, W. C. Hoffmann, X. Han, S. Chen, and Y. Lan. “Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer,” Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 737, 139793.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. R. Kumar, and A. K. Agrawal. “Drone GPS data analysis for flight path reconstruction: A study on DJI, Parrot & Yuneec make drones,” Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 2021, 38, 301182.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. E. Gallo, and A. Barrientos. “Reduction of GNSSDenied inertial navigation errors for fixed wing autonomous unmanned air vehicles,” Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 120, 107237.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Market Size to Reach USD 72320 Million by 2028 at a CAGR of 14.4%” | Valuates Reports.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. https://www.prnewswire.com/in/news-releases/unmanned-aerial-vehicle-uav-market-sizeto-reach-usd-72320-million-by-2028-at-a-cagr-of-14-4-valuates-reports-870953616.html.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. K. Andersen, M. H. Frederiksen, M. P. Knudsen, and A. D. Krabbe. “The strategic responses of start-ups to regulatory constraints in the nascent drone market,” Research Policy, 49(10), 2020, 104055.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Identifying causal relationships in mobile app issues: An interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL approach,” Wireless Personal Communications, 108(2), 2019, 683–710.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, & P. Pandey. “Mobile APP development based on agility function,” Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, 23(6), 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. S. McIlroy, N. Ali, H. Khalid, and A. E. Hassan. “Analyzing and automatically labelling the types of user issues that are raised in mobile app reviews,” Empirical Software Engineering, 21(3), 2016, 1067–1106.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Perception-based classification of mobile apps: A critical review,” Smart computational strategies: Theoretical and practical aspects, 2019, 121–133.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Application of fuzzy DEMATEL approach in analyzing mobile app issues,” Programming and Computer Software, 45(5), 2019, 268–287.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Mobile applications in context of big data: A survey,” In 2016 Symposium on Colossal Data Analysis and Networking (CDAN) (pp. 1–5). 2016, March, IEEE.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Empirical analysis of defects in handheld device applications,” In International Conference on Advances in Computing and Data Sciences (pp. 103–113). 2019, April. Springer, Singapore.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Applicability of machine learning methods on mobile app effort estimation: Validation and performance evaluation,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 30(01), 2020, 23–41.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Novel approach for mobile based app development incorporating MAAF,” Wireless Personal Communications, 107(4), 2019, 1687–1708.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Validation of existing software effort estimation techniques in context with mobile software applications,” Wireless Personal Communications, 110(4), 2020, 1659–1677.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey, “Identifying causal relationships in mobile app issues: An interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL approach,” Wireless Personal Communications, 108(2), 2019, 683–710.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Impact of various critical factors on Mobile App development based on reviews: An Investigative Study,” Technia, 9(1), 2016, 1097–1105.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. M. Pandey, R. Litoriya, and P. Pandey. “Mobile APP development based on agility function Mobile APP development based on agility function.”
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. M. Harman, Y. Jia, Y. Zhang. “App store mining and analysis: Msr for app stores,” In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE working conference on mining software repositories, MSR ’12. IEEE Press, 2012, pp. 108–111.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. A. Finkelstein, M. Harman, Y. Jia, W. Martin, F. Sarro, Y. Zhang. “Investigating the relationship between price, rating, and popularity in the Blackberry world app store,” Inf Softw Technol 87, 2017, 119–139.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. G. Lee, and R. Santanam. “Determinants of Mobile Apps’ Success: Evidence from the App Store Market,” Journal of Management Information Systems 31(2), 2017, 133–170.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. J. Nikolas, A. S. Fogarty, K. Boydell, and Christensen. “The Reviews Are in: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Consumer Perspectives on Apps for Bipolar Disorder,” In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE consumer communications and networking conference, CCNC ’13, (2017), pp. 149–157.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. L. Hoon, R. Vasa, J. G. Schneider, K. Mouzakis. “A preliminary analysis of vocabulary in mobile app user reviews,” In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian computer-human interaction conference, OzCHI ’12. ACM, 2012, pp. 245–248.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. R. Vasa, L. Hoon, K. Mouzakis, A. Noguchi. “A preliminary analysis of mobile app user reviews,” In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian computerhuman interaction conference, OzCHI ’12. ACM, 2012, pp. 241–244.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. B. Fu, J. Lin, L. Li, C. Faloutsos, J. Hong, N. Sadeh. “Why people hate your app: making sense of user feedback in a mobile app store,” In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD ’13. ACM, 2013, pp. 1276–1284.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. P. M. Vu, T. T. Nguyen, and H. V. Pham, H. V. “Mining User Opinions in Mobile App Reviews: A Keyword-based Approach,” 2013, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.04657.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. L. Zhang, X. Y. Huang, and Y. K. Hu, “CSLabel: An Approach for Labelling Mobile App Reviews,” 32(6), 2017, 1076–1089.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. K. Phetrungnapha, T. Senivongse. “Classification of Mobile Application User Reviews for Generating Tickets on Issue Tracking System,” 2019, 12th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. L. Padgaonkar, S. Jain, S. Ajgaonkar, R. Londhe, and B. S. Balbudhe. “Mobile Application Review Classification Using Machine Learning Approach,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 2019, 5806–5809.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. A. P. Widyassari, S. Rustad, G. F. Shidik, E. Noersasongko, A. Syukur, A. Affandy, D. De Setiadi. “Review of automatic text summarization techniques & methods,” 34(4), 2022, 1029–1046.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. K. Kalaichelavan, H. Malik, N.. Husnu, and S. Shreenath. “What Do People Complain About Drone Apps? A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Google Play Store Reviews,” Procedia Computer Science, 170, 2020, 547–554.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. T. Zhang, J. Chen, X. Zhan, X. Luo, D. Lo, and H. Jiang. Where2Change: Change Request Localization for App Reviews, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 47(11), 2590–2616.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. H. Khalid, E. Shihab, M. Nagappan, and A. E. Hassan, “What Do Mobile App Users Complain About?”, IEEE Software 32(3), 2021, 1–1.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. R. Vasa, L. Hoon, K. Mouzakis, and A. Noguchi. “A Preliminary Analysis of Mobile App User Reviews,” Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, 2012, doi: 10.1145/2414536.2414577.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. C. Iacob, and R. Harrison. Retrieving and analyzing mobile apps feature requests from online reviews, 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), 2013, doi: 10.1109/MSR.2013.6624001.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. F. Paloma, M. L. V´asquez, G. Bavota, R. Oliveto, M. D. Penta, D. Poshyvanyk, and A. D. Lucia. “Crowdsourcing User Reviews to Support the Evolution of Mobile Apps,” 2017, 137, 143–162.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. D. Ferreira, J. Goncalves, V. Kostakos, and A. K. Dey. “Contextual Experience Sampling of Mobile Application Micro-Usage,” MobileHCI 2014, Sept. 23–26, 2014, Toronto, ON, CA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. E. Falatoonitoosi, S. Ahmaed, and S. Sorooshiyan. “Expanded DEMATEL for determining cause and effect group in bidirectional relations,” The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1–8.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. G. Shen, S. G. Sun, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, B. Chen, C. Ma. “System failure analysis based on DEMATEL-ISM and FMECA,” Journal of Central South University, 21, 2014, 4518–4525.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. W. Zhang, Y, Deng. “Combining conflicting evidence using the DEMATEL method,” Soft Computing, 23, 2019, 8207–8216.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. W. Zhang, Y. Deng. “Combining conflicting evidence using the DEMATEL method,” Soft Computing, 23, 2019, 8207–8216.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. W. Liu. “Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions,” Artif Intell 170(11), 2006, 909–924.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. M. L. Tseng. “A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using greyfuzzy dematel approach,” Expert Syst Appl 36(4), 2009, 7738–7748.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. H. S. Lee, G. H. Tzeng, W. Yeih, Y. J. Wang, and S. C. Yang. “Revised DEMATEL: Resolving the Infeasibility of DEMATEL,” 37(11), 2013, 6746–6757.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. J. I. Shieh, H. H. Wu. “A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality,” Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 2013, 277-282.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. M. Yazdi, F. Khan, R. Abbasi, and R. Rusli. “Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision-making,” Safety Science, 127, 2020, 1047–125.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. W. C. Wang, Y. H. Lin, C. L. Lin, C. H. Chung, M. T. Lee. DEMATEL-based model to improve the performance in a matrix organization, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 2012, 4978–4986.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Y. Li,Y. Hu, X. Zhang, Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, “An evidential dematel method to identify critical success factors in emergency management,” Appl Soft Comput J 22, 2014, 504–510.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Y. Lin, C. Wang, C. Ma, Z. Dou, X. Ma. “A new combination method for multisensor conflict information,” J Supercomput 72(7), 2016, 1–17.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. J. Hu, and G. N. Zhu. “A Rough-Z-numberbased DEMATEL to evaluate the co-creative sustainable value propositions for smart product-service systems,” 38(8), 2021, 3645–3679.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. P. Zdzislaw. “Rough sets, rough relations and rough functions,” Fundamental Informaticae, 27(2–3), 1996, 103–108.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. J. Wen, X. Chunhe, L. Yu, and T. Yongchuan. “Ranking Z-numbers with an improved ranking method for generalized fuzzy numbers,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(3), 2017, 1931–1943.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. B. Kang, D. Wei, Y. Li, and Y. Deng. “A Method of Converting Z-number to Classical Fuzzy Number,” Journal of Information & Computational Science, 9(3), 2012, 703–709.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. M. Tarokh, M. Cross, and M. Lee. “Erratum to: Fuzzy logic decision making for multi-robot security systems,” Artificial Intelligence Review, 34, 2010, 289.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. A. Shahzaib, A. Saleem, M. Tahir, G. Fazal, M. Tariq. “Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36(3), 2019, 2829–2844.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. S. L. Si, X. Y. You, H. C. Liu. “DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications,” Mathematical problems in Engineering, 2018, doi. 10.1155/2018/3696457.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. B. Chang, C. Chang, C. H. Wu. “Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria,” Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2011, 1850–1858.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. S. Yuksel, H. Dincer, S. Eti, and Z. Adali. “Strategy improvements to minimize the drawbacks of geothermal investments by using spherical fuzzy modelling,” International Journal of Energy Research, 2022, doi: 10.1002/er.7880.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. S. Gul. “Extending ARAS with Integration of Objective Attribute Weighting under Spherical Fuzzy Environment,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 20(3), 2021, 1011–1036.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. A. Shahzaib, A. Saleem, A. Muhammad, Q. Muhammad, K. Marwan. “Spherical fuzzy sets and its representation of spherical fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36(6), 2019, 6089–6102.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  66. K. Gundogdu, Fatma, and K. Cengiz. “A novel VIKOR method using spherical fuzzy sets and its application to warehouse site selection,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37(1), 2019, 1197–1211.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14313/jamris/2-2023/14 | Journal eISSN: 2080-2145 | Journal ISSN: 1897-8649
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 36 - 50
Submitted on: Jul 25, 2022
|
Accepted on: Nov 3, 2022
|
Published on: Jan 26, 2024
Published by: Łukasiewicz Research Network – Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Drone apps,
Issues,
Multi-criteria decision making,
Spherical fuzzy DEMATEL
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing,
Mechanical engineering,
Fundamentals of mechanical engineering

© 2024 Mamta Pandey, Ratnesh Litoriya, Prateek Pandey, published by Łukasiewicz Research Network – Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 17 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)Next article