Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Hierarchical Bayesian Implementation of the Experience-Weighted Attraction Model Cover

A Hierarchical Bayesian Implementation of the Experience-Weighted Attraction Model

Open Access
|Nov 2020

Figures & Tables

00028f01c.png
Figure 1. 

Patent Race game. A) After a fixation screen, subjects were presented with the Patent Race game, with information regarding their endowment, the endowment of the opponent, and the potential prize. B) Subjects input the decision (self-paced) by pressing a button mapped to the desired investment amount from the initial endowment. C) After 2–6 s, the opponent’s choice was revealed. If the subject’s investment was strictly more than those of the opponent, the subject won the prize; otherwise, the subject lost the prize. In either case, the subject kept the portion of the endowment not invested.

00028f02c.png
Figure 2. 

Histogram of posterior means of the participant- and session-level parameters (δ ij , λ ij , ϕ ij , ρ ij for all i and j) from the full model with posterior means of the parameters from the shared parameter model (δ, λ, ϕ, ρ) indicated with the red dashed line. The average posterior standard deviations (averaged across all participants and sessions) corresponding to each grouping of parameters is δ: 0.12, λ: 0.17, ϕ: 0.05, ρ: 0.08.

Table 1. 

Posterior inference for the data application presented on the odds ratio (δ, ϕ, ρ) and relative risk (λ) scales

Effect Parameter Mean (SD) Posterior quantile
0.025 0.500 0.975
Age (years) δ 0.87 (0.23)0.470.851.38
λ 1.06 (0.07)0.931.061.21
ϕ 2.38 (1.93)0.641.817.77
ρ 2.25 (1.45)0.811.866.44
Male vs. female δ 1.81 (1.07)0.571.584.41
λ 0.90 (0.13)0.660.891.19
ϕ 8.15 (11.62)0.614.6039.24
ρ 3.68 (3.64)0.422.4713.61
Session: 1 vs. 2 δ 1.15 (0.43)0.521.082.18
λ 1.16 (0.10)0.961.161.37
ϕ 0.65 (0.19)0.360.631.08
ρ 0.76 (0.22)0.390.751.25
Strong vs. weak role δ a 4.67 (2.18)2.104.1810.23
λ a 0.50 (0.05)0.420.500.60
ϕ a 0.26 (0.08)0.140.250.44
ρ a 0.30 (0.09)0.150.290.52

[i] Note. a95% credible interval excludes 0.

Table 2. 

Posterior inference for the variance/covariance matrix, converted to the correlation scale

Parameter δ λ ϕ ρ
δ 1.00−0.09−0.65 a −0.68 a
λ  1.000.070.16
ϕ   1.000.97 a
ρ    1.00

[i] Note. a95% credible interval does not include zero. The credible intervals for the diagonal elements all exclude zero by definition since they are equal to one.

00028f03c.png
Figure 3. 

Scatterplot of the posterior mean estimates for the participant- and session-level parameters from the full model and the unique parameter model. The asterisk indicates the corresponding posterior mean estimated from the shared parameter model.

Table 3. 

Simulation study results

Variability Model δ λ ϕ ρ WAIC (EP)
NoShared0.00 (1.00)0.90 (1.00)0.75 (1.00)0.60 (1.00)12,471 (4)
Unique13.27 (1.00)53.84 (0.70)17.14 (0.94)34.02 (0.88)13,012 (209)
Full5.23 (1.00)9.61 (1.00)1.51 (1.00)3.01 (1.00)12,814 (105)
YesShared19.05 (0.14)27.74 (0.33)14.73 (0.04)18.16 (0.05)12,839 (5)
Unique10.35 (1.00)41.16 (0.83)10.59 (0.83)31.82 (0.68)11,537 (234)
Full7.31 (1.00)10.81 (0.98)3.12 (0.95)5.87 (0.94)11,350 (141)

[i] Note. Average mean absolute error across all participant- and session-level parameters is displayed with average coverage of the 95% credible intervals given in parentheses. Estimates of mean absolute error are multiplied by 100 for presentation purposes. EP = effective number of parameters.

00028f04c.png
Figure 4. 

Histograms of posterior means of the participant- and session-level parameters (δ ij , λ ij , ϕ ij , ρ ij for all i and j) obtained from fitting the different models on the simulated dataset with no variability. True values of the parameters for generating this simulated dataset (δ, λ, ϕ, ρ) are indicated by the black dashed lines.

00028f05c.png
Figure 5. 

True versus estimated (posterior means) participant- and session-level parameters (δ ij , λ ij , ϕ ij , ρ ij for all i and j) obtained from fitting the different models on the simulated dataset with variability. The identity line (y = x), which indicates the ideal situation where estimated parameters are exactly the same as true parameters, is shown in blue. R 2 = coefficient of determination.

00028f06c.png
Figure 6. 

True versus estimated session effects (i.e., differences of posterior means) on parameters (δ ij , λ ij , ϕ ij , ρ ij for all i) between the two sessions obtained from fitting either the unique parameter model or the full model on the simulated dataset with variability. The identity line (y = x), which indicates the ideal situation where estimated session effects are exactly the same as true session effects, is shown in blue. R 2 = coefficient of determination.

Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 20, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 18, 2020
Published on: Nov 1, 2020
Published by: MIT Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Zhihao Zhang, Saksham Chandra, Andrew Kayser, Ming Hsu, Joshua L. Warren, published by MIT Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.