Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influence of supersaturation on the concentration of ice nucleating particles Cover

Influence of supersaturation on the concentration of ice nucleating particles

Open Access
|Jan 2018

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Activated fraction AF (a) and n s (b) vs. saturation ratio S w for FC, MCC and ATD.

Table 1.

Percentage variation of AF vs. saturation ratio S w for FC, MCC and ATD.

Aerosol typePV1.02–0.94 (%)PV1.05–1.02 (%)PV1.1–1.05 (%)PV1.1–1.02 (%)FC25443339MCC386441059ATD1390182750
Fig. 2.

Activated fraction AF (a) and n s (b) vs. saturation ratio S w for marine, urban background (UB) and mixed PM10 aerosol.

Table 2.

Percentage variation of AF vs. saturation ratio S w for marine, urban background (UB) and mixed PM10 aerosol.

Aerosol typePV1.02–0.94 (%)PV1.05–1.02 (%)PV1.1–1.05 (%)PV1.1–1.02 (%)Marine25002626UB2105035101Mixed279393174
Fig. 3.

Average INP concentration vs. saturation ratio S w for marine, urban background (UB) and mixed PM10 aerosol.

Fig. 4.

24 h back-trajectories on 24 (left) and 25 April (right) 2016 at CG at 00:00 UTC.

Fig. 5.

INP concentration vs. saturation ratio S w for PM1 and PM10: (a) marine; (b) UB.

Fig. 6.

24 h back-trajectories on 09 February 2017 at Bologna at: (left) 09:00 UTC and (right) 15:00 UTC.

Fig. 7.

Log-log plot of INP concentration versus ice supersaturation for PM10 aerosol fraction.

Language: English
Page range: 1454809 - 1454809
Submitted on: Apr 20, 2017
Accepted on: Mar 16, 2018
Published on: Jan 1, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Franco Belosi, Matteo Piazza, Alessia Nicosia, Gianni Santachiara, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.