Introduction
1.
The estimate of the uptake of atmospheric CO2 by the terrestrial biosphere (2.6 ± 1.2 PgC yr−1 in terms of the global annual average from 2000 to 2009) (IPCC, 2013) is associated with a relatively large uncertainty compared to that by the ocean (2.3 ± 0.7 PgC yr−1), and this uncertainty is partly due to the difficulties associated with estimating the variation of the land flux. Variations in the land flux are driven by the effects of disturbances and changes induced by natural and anthropogenic origins, such as changes in temperature and precipitation (Malhi and Wright, 2004), forest fires, logging practices and plantings (Amiro et al., 2006; Ramankutty et al., 2007; Hirata et al., 2014); these changes cannot easily be monitored at different temporal and spatial scales because of the complicated features of terrestrial surfaces. Nevertheless, the CO2 flux of the terrestrial surface has to be accurately evaluated because both increases and decreases in the flux directly affect the accumulation rate of atmospheric CO2, which is the largest driving factor for climate change. Especially in Southeast Asia, tropical forests are very important in terms of emissions from frequent large forest fire events and continuous land use change.
Methods for observing CO2 fluxes from forests can be roughly categorized into two types of methods. One method involves the installation of a tower in a forest to measure the change of atmospheric CO2 concentrations near the forest canopy using the eddy-covariance method at the top of the tower (e.g. Saigusa et al., 2008). This method is called the bottom-up method, and it has been carried out at many forest sites around the world. However, strictly speaking, the CO2 flux evaluated by the bottom-up method is a very local flux, and the results are therefore limited to the forest near the tower. Hence, many tower sites are necessary to assess the CO2 flux at the regional scale. Additionally, note that, especially in the case of tropical regions, CO2 flux observations at night by the eddy-covariance method are difficult to undertake because of the low wind speed. Therefore, an assessment of the CO2 flux by methods other than the eddy-covariance method is necessary. The other method involves the use of atmospheric CO2 concentration observations and inverse-model calculations (e.g. Gurney et al., 2004; Peylin et al., 2013). This method is called the top-down method, and it actively uses global observations of CO2 concentrations collected by satellites (e.g. the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite, GOSAT) in addition to background ground data in recent years (e.g. Maksyutov et al., 2013; Kondo et al., 2015). In general, inverse modelling calculations are applied to global flux evaluations at the continental scale. Therefore, when we evaluate the CO2 flux of a regional forest for one country using the top-down method, it can be difficult to obtain accurate data because CO2 observations by satellites and background base stations are not available at high temporal and spatial resolutions at present. In addition, the success rates for satellite observations will be limited if the targeted region is a tropical rain forest because tropical regions are typically covered by clouds, which prevent infrared (IR) absorption measurements for the air from space.
For the evaluation of regional forest CO2 fluxes, CO2 vertical profile observations over the forest are sometimes used as an intermediate-scale method (boundary-layer budget method). Specifically, this method can use (1) changes in the CO2 distribution with the elapse of time according to CO2 vertical profiles assessed at the same site (Chou et al., 2002) or (2) differences in the CO2 concentration between a forest site and background site (Gatti et al., 2010). In previous studies, estimation of the CO2 flux by observations of CO2 vertical profiles has been carried out in regions that have large forests areas such as the Amazon (Wofsy et al., 1988) and Siberia (Lloyd et al., 2001; Sasakawa et al., 2013). These studies demonstrated the feasibility of applying the CO2 flux assessment method to relatively large forests. On the other hand, Yamamoto et al. (1996) assessed the CO2 sink flux of the subtropical forest on Iriomote Island using not vertical profile measurements, but the horizontal CO2 distribution at a height of 300 m by aircraft.
In tropical rain forests in Southeast Asia, such as the Pasoh forest on the Malay Peninsula (Kosugi et al., 2008) and Palangkaraya on Borneo Island (Hirano et al., 2007), CO2 flux observations by eddy-covariance methods have been carried out. However, evaluations of the CO2 flux at the regional scale by use of other methods have not been made. This region has large CO2 emissions, especially during El Niño years (Hooijer et al., 2010), and many of these emissions are being driven by forest fires and deforestation. Kondo et al. (2015) reported that the CO2 budget of the tropical rainforest in Asia had a high uncertainty and that the agreement of results obtained from the bottom-up method and top-down method was poor.
The typical observation method for constructing CO2 vertical profiles in the atmosphere involves aircraft measurements (e.g. Tanaka et al., 1983; Wofsy et al., 1988; Nakazawa et al., 1993; Lloyd et al., 2001; Machida et al., 2002, 2008; Vay et al., 2003; Gatti et al., 2010; Sasakawa et al., 2013). However, the operation of an aircraft generally requires high costs, preparation time and manpower. To address these issues, AirCore, an innovative sampling system, was developed recently by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (Tans, 2009; Karion et al., 2010). It is very cost effective and the analytical precision can be high. However, because AirCore itself has to be acquired after it lands on the ground, the implementation of AirCore technology in deep forest areas and at ocean sites is challenging. Here, we explore the use of newly developed CO2 sondes for vertical profile measurements.
CO2 sonde techniques can be applied more universally for the measurement of CO2 profiles. Basically, launching a sonde can be done more freely than the deployment of other techniques in both forests and cities, similar to meteorological radiosondes. Bouche et al. (2016) launched a balloon with a commercial CO2 measurement system (Li-820 and 840, Li-COR Co., Ltd.) and observed the vertical CO2 profiles over agricultural fields. They tried to detect a land CO2 sink signal according to the differences in the vertical CO2 profiles collected at different times.
Meisei Electric Co., Ltd. (Japan), developed a commercial-based CO2 sonde in 2012; it contains an economic and simple IR absorption system with an air pump powered by batteries. To enhance the absolute accuracy of CO2 measurements, the instrument is equipped with two kinds of standard gases (low and high standards) for periodic calibrations during the ascent process, where atmospheric pressure and temperature are continuously changing.
In this study, to evaluate the CO2 emission and absorption of forests where little CO2 observation data are available, such as in tropical Asia, we deployed a CO2 sonde (Meisei Electric Co., Ltd.) to collect measurements of the CO2 vertical profiles over Asian forests ranging from northern Japan to Southeast Asia. Applicability of the CO2 sonde data for evaluations of forest fluxes is discussed. At the same time, we placed CO2 measurement systems at multiple sites around the target areas to characterize the CO2 concentrations and to detect the signal by the forest CO2 flux. We would like to show here how the systematic CO2 variation around forests can be used to clarify the ways in which forest sinks can locally affect the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.
Methods
2.
Site information
2.1.
The locations of the sites used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. We selected sites that had a widespread distribution of vegetation, relatively flat land and a low population density. The study sites were located in the northern part (Teshio) of Hokkaido Island, Japan, Iriomote Island, Japan and the northeastern part of Borneo Island, Malaysia.

Fig. 1.
Location of the observation sites. (a) Hokkaido Island, which is located in the northern part of Japan. (b) Iriomote Island and Hateruma Island, which are located in the southeastern part of Japan. (c) Sabah, Malaysia, which is located in the northeastern part of Borneo Island. Circles are the observation sites for continuous CO2 measurements. Triangles are the observation sites for CO2 sonde and continuous CO2 measurements. Squares are the reference (background) sites used for the circles and triangles. (d) Borneo’s reference (background) site is located around 5°N, 150°E in the Pacific Ocean (shipboard measurements) (close up image not shown).
Land-use percentages for forest, farmland, water and urban areas were 74, 23, 2 and 1% in the northern part of Hokkaido, respectively (Hokkaido Prefecture, 2014); for Iriomote Island, these values were 94, 3, 2 and 1%, respectively (Taketomi Town, 2010). The main species in the forest include Abies sachalinensis, which measure 8–24 m in height, in the northern part of Hokkaido (Teshio) (Takagi et al., 2015) and Castanopsis sieboldii in Iriomote (Aramoto et al., 1989). The Danum Valley Conservation Area (438 km2) on Borneo Island (Sabah, Malaysia) is covered by tropical rainforests with widely distributed Dipterocarpaceae as the dominant species, but oil palm fields are also distributed in the northeastern part of the island (Marsh and Greer, 1992; Reynolds et al., 2011).
The CO2 observations collected by the CO2 sonde and the continuous CO2 measurement system were performed at Teshio (TSO), Toikanbetsu (TKB) and Hamatonbetsu (HTB) in Hokkaido, Haimi (HIM), Komi (KMI), Funaura (FUR),and Shirahama (SHM) in Iriomote, and Tawau (TWU) and Danum valley (DMV) in Borneo. Latitude, longitude, temperature and precipitation data for the sites are summarized in Table 1. In the case of Hokkaido (Japan), three sites were chosen in terms of the wind direction (i.e. from the west (upwind) to the east (downwind)). In the case of Iriomote Island, four sites corresponding to four directions (E, W, S and N) were selected. This allowed us to use two appropriate sites according to the wind direction for the sonde experiments in Iriomote. In these cases, we expected that we could calculate the forest flux using the difference of the profile between the upwind site and downwind site. On the other hand, because wind speed is extremely low at the Borneo sites, we could not expect to make such observations by way of using the wind flow. Therefore, we chose a forest site (Danum valley) and a non-forest site (Tawau) to compare the time series of CO2 profiles and calculate the CO2 flux there.
Table 1.
Summary of the observation sites used in this study.
Equipment
2.2.
CO2 sonde
2.2.1.
Fig. 2a-1 shows a schematic of the CO2 sonde (MCD-10, Meisei Electric Co., Ltd.). The CO2 sonde consists of a balloon, a cutter for cutting the rope, a parachute, CO2 sensor (NDIR, non-dispersive infrared absorption), two 10 L aluminium bags filled with CO2 standard gases (approximately 380 and 430 ppm, respectively) (scale: NIES09 (Machida et al., 2009)), and a radiosonde (RS-06G, Meisei Electric Co., Ltd.). The sensor took measurements at 4.0 and 4.3 μm of the wavelength for the base IR line and CO2 IR absorption, respectively, and the resolution of the measurements was 0.1 ppm. The total weight was about 2 kg. Helium gas (3700 L) was used to inflate the balloon. The balloon, parachute, cutter and CO2 measurement component were combined into one and launched at a rising speed of 2–3 m s−1 to an altitude of 10 km. The cutter was used to complete the observation phase and drop the CO2 sonde at that time. The CO2 sonde measured alternately outside air and two CO2 standard gases through the elevation ascent process. In addition, location information (latitude, longitude and altitude), air pressure, temperature and relative humidity were measured by the radiosonde. The sampling air was dried by the dehumidifying device, which was located in front of the pump in the CO2 sensor. Filters (SLHA033SS: 0.45 μm; Millipore Co., Ltd.) were installed at the front and back of the dehumidifying part. Details about the other parameters can be viewed at the product’s home page (http://www.meisei.co.jp/products/meteo/co2.html).

Fig. 2.
(a) These images show the (1) schematic, (2) measurement sequence and (3) standard (for 40 s) deviation as a function of altitude for the CO2 standard gases measured with the CO2 sonde. The standard deviation of the CO2 sonde data was calculated from the analysed values for both high and low standard gases over 40 s. A total of 18 CO2 sonde measurements were used for the calculations (at Hokkaido, Iriomote and Borneo, where the sonde was launched on September 2012, September 2013 and August 2015, respectively). (b) These images show the (1) schematic, (2) measurement sequence and (3) relative frequency of the standard deviation for CO2 standard gases measured with continuous CO2 measurements. The standard deviation of the continuous CO2 measurement data was calculated from the analysed values for each of four standard gases over 3 min. The observational results at Hokkaido (from August 2012 to September 2013), Iriomote (from July 2013 to December 2015) and Borneo (from January to December 2015) were used for the calculations.
Fig. 2a-2 shows the measurement sequence of the CO2 sonde. The CO2 sonde measured the high CO2 standard gas, outside air, low CO2 standard gas and outside air for a duration of 40 s for each endpoint, and this sequence was repeated. The averaged standard deviation of the 40 s measurement signals for the CO2 standard gas was 0.2–0.5 ppm from the ground to an altitude of 6000 m, and it was over 0.5 ppm from altitudes of 6000 m to 10,000 m (Fig. 2a-3); the measurement sensitivity decreased at higher altitudes because of the lower pressures in the absorption cell.
The observation dates are shown in Table 2. Sonde experiments were done at two sites simultaneously in each targeted forest area twice a day (at dawn just after sunrise and around 14:00). In the case of the Japanese sites (Hokkaido and Iriomote), two sites were chosen in terms of the wind direction (i.e. TSO (upwind) site and TKB (downwind) site). In Iriomote, we selected different combinations of the sites for the three measurements that were used to produce the final results. On the other hand, in Borneo, in order to evaluate CO2 accumulation or absorption by the forest area, the differences of CO2 profiles over time at a forest site (DMV) and non-forest site (TWU) were observed.
Table 2.
Location and time of the CO2 sonde and continuous measurements.
The CO2 sonde experiment was started in Hokkaido (typical northern Japanese forest) in September 2012. Next in 2013, we selected the subtropical forest (Iriomote) for the experimental site and the sonde experiments were launched on September 2013. Finally, we attempted the sonde experiments in Danum valley forest and Tawau on Borneo Island in August 2015 in cooperation with the Tawau Malaysian Meteorological Department (MMD).
Continuous CO2 measurement equipment
2.2.2.
Fig. 2b-1 shows a schematic of the continuous CO2 measurement system. The system consists of a pump, NDIR (Li-840A, Li-COR Co., Ltd.), a flow metre, and 10 L cylinders of CO2 standard gases (approximately 370, 390, 410 and 430 ppm) (scale: NIES09). The inlets of TKB in Hokkaido and DMV in Borneo were installed at the observation towers (heights of 30 and 60 m from the ground, respectively), which are located about 5 km away from the site where we launched the CO2 sonde. The DMV site was the Malaysian WMO monitoring site, which is located at the top of the mountain (430 m in altitude). The inlets of the other sites were installed on the roof or wall (approximately 4 m from the ground) of the buildings where the instruments were installed.
Fig. 2b-2 shows the measurement sequence of the continuous CO2 measurement system. The system measured four kinds of CO2 standard gas for 3 min each, and then, outside air was measured for 11 h and 48 min and this sequence was repeated. This system has no drying component, but the dry air based CO2 mole fraction was calculated from the H2O concentration by the Li-840A. Estimated accuracy for the sample air measurements was about 0.3 ppm, even though the accuracy for CO2 standard gas was around 0.1 ppm (Fig. 2b-3).
The continuous CO2 measurement system observed atmospheric CO2 concentrations on the ground at three sites from August 2012 to September 2013 in Hokkaido, four sites in July 2013–December 2015 in Iriomote, and two sites in January 2015 to present in Borneo (Table 2).
Meteorological data
2.3.
The data for wind direction and wind speed in Hokkaido and Iriomote were measured by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), and the data were taken from the JMA website (http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/index.php). The climatological parameters in Borneo were measured by local offices of the MMD. The data for wind direction and wind speed were collected by a propeller-vane anemometer (03002-L, R. M. Young Co., Ltd.).
Reference data-set
2.4.
We used the Cape Ochi-ishi (COI) (latitude: 43°09′37″N, longitude: 145°29′50″E, altitude: 40 m) and Hateruma (HAT) (latitude: 24°03′38″N, longitude: 123°48′33″E, altitude: 10 m) monitoring stations, which are managed by the Center for Global Environmental Research (CGER) and Japan’s National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), as reference or background sites for Hokkaido and Iriomote, respectively. These sites are located very close to the study sites. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations at the stations were measured by NDIR (Li-7000, Li-COR Co., Ltd.) (scale: NIES09).
We also chose air samples collected in the western Pacific as a reference (background) for Borneo, and this site was located in the area of 5°N and 150°E over the Pacific Ocean, i.e. the same latitude as Borneo. The air samples were automatically collected by 3.3 L stainless steel bottles on a voluntary observation cargo ship, which sailed among Japan, Australia and New Zealand at six-week intervals (Terao et al., 2011). The bottles were carried back to the CGER laboratory, and the air in the bottles was analysed by NDIR (Li-6252, Li-COR Co., Ltd.) (scale: NIES09).
To compare the forest fluxes estimated in this study to those from the eddy-covariance technique, we used CO2 flux data from the Santarem-km67-Primary Forest (Wu et al., 2016), which is located in the central Amazon in Brazil (latitude: 2°51′24.1″S, longitude: 54°57′32.0″W), and the Pasoh Forest Reserve (Kosugi et al., 2008), which is located about 70 km east of Kuala Lumpur (latitude: 2°58′14.6″N, longitude: 102°17′57.8″E). Those data were taken from the databases of the Ameriflux web site (http://ameriflux.lbl.gov/data/download-data/) and Asiaflux web site (https://db.cger.nies.go.jp/asiafluxdb/?page_id=16), respectively. The data for the Amazon and Pasoh consisted of hourly CO2 fluxes from 05:00 to noon in August 2002–2011 (expect for 2006 and 2007) and hourly CO2 fluxes from 06:00 to noon in August 2003–2009, respectively.
Planetary boundary layer
2.5.
We evaluated the height of the stably stratified planetary boundary layer (SBL) at dawn and the convective planetary boundary layer (CBL) in daytime at the time when the sondes were launched from the level of the maximum vertical gradient in potential temperature, which is indicative of the transition from a convectively less stable region below to a more stable region above. The level of the minimum vertical gradient of specific humidity was also used to decide the SBL and CBL height. These methods for estimating the SBL and CBL heights are based on the methods reviewed by Seidel et al. (2010). The SBL and CBL heights that agreed better with the transitions in CO2 concentrations were ultimately selected.
Results and discussion
3.
Measurements by the CO2 sonde
3.1.
Flight paths for the horizontal direction
3.1.1.
The horizontal pathways of the flights for each CO2 sonde every 10 min are shown in Fig. 3. The CO2 sondes launched from TSO and TKB in Hokkaido flew towards the east–north-east, and the sonde launched from TSO passed over TKB after 30 min and arrived at the sea after 60 min (Fig. 3a). The three CO2 sondes launched from SHM in Iriomote were always driven out to the sea by the west–south-west wind from the land over a very short period of time. The two CO2 sondes launched from HIM were also driven out to the sea rapidly. The CO2 sonde launched from KMI crossed over the island from east to west after 30 min because of the wind from the ocean, and then, it flew towards the north-east (Fig. 3b). The CO2 sondes launched from TWU and DMV in Borneo on all days flew to the north-east (Fig. 3c). Horizontal distances of sonde trajectories were shorter in Borneo than those in Japan because of the weaker horizontal winds in the tropics.

Fig. 3.
Flight paths every 10 min for the horizontal direction of CO2 sonde measurements taken in (a) Hokkaido, (b) Iriomote and (c) Borneo. The CO2 sonde was launched twice at Hokkaido, three times at Iriomote, and four times at Borneo. The CO2 sonde rises at about 1200–1800 m per 10 min.
The sites TSO and TKB in Hokkaido on 7 September 2012, and KMI and SHM in Iriomote on 28 September 2013 were regarded as the upwind sites and downwind sites, respectively. HIM and SHM in Iriomote on 25 and 26 September 2013 also exhibited a relationship of an upwind site and downwind site for the Iriomote forest because HIM and SHM received unaffected and affected air masses from the forest, respectively. Although TWU and DMV in Borneo had no relationship indicative of an upwind site and downwind site, TWU was mainly influenced by the air over the sea and DMV was mainly influenced by the air over the forest.
Thus, we were able to confidently classify the experimental sites into upwind sites (U) and downwind sites (D) over the forests for Hokkaido and Iriomote as shown in Table 3. We could also classify TWU and DMV in Borneo as the coast site (C) and forest site (F), respectively, according to the sonde trajectories.
Table 3.
The height of the stable boundary layer (SBL) and convective planetary boundary layer (CBL) and average CO2 concentrations inside the SBL and CBL.
The height of the planetary boundary layer (SBL and CBL) and weather conditions
3.1.2.
Fig. 4 shows the potential temperature (PT) and specific humidity (SH) of vertical profiles from the ground to 4000 m in altitude at dawn and daytime at all sites. In addition, the SBL and CBL heights, which were presumed from the level of the maximum vertical gradient of potential temperature and the minimum vertical gradient of specific humidity, are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.
Vertical profiles of potential temperature and specific humidity at (a) 05:00 on 7 September 2012 in Hokkaido, (b) 14:00 on 7 September 2012 in Hokkaido, (c) 06:00 on 26 September 2013 in Iriomote, (d) 14:00 on 25 and 28 September 2013 in Iriomote, (e) 07:00 on 5 and 6 August 2015 in Borneo, and (f) 14:00 on 4 and 5 August 2015 in Borneo. Black lines are the potential temperature, and red lines are the specific humidity. Solid lines show the upwind sites (Hokkaido and Iriomote) and coast site (Borneo), and dashed lines show the downwind sites (Hokkaido and Iriomote) and forest site (Borneo). The height of the stable boundary layer (SBL) and planetary boundary layer (PBL) are also shown (see text).
On Hokkaido and Iriomote Island, SBL and CBL heights for the upwind sites and downwind sites were almost the same. They were 400 m (SBL) at dawn and 1500 m (CBL) at daytime in Hokkaido, and 200 m (SBL) at dawn and 1000 m (CBL) at daytime in Iriomote.
Weather conditions were sunny on all days at both sites expect for at dawn on 26 September in Iriomote, which was partly cloudy. The wind speed in Hokkaido was 4 m s−1 at dawn and 12 m s−1 in the daytime. The wind speed in Iriomote was 6 m s−1 on 25 and 26 September and 3 m s−1 on 28 September; these values were slightly higher than usual because of the influence of a typhoon in the Pacific.
In the case of Borneo, SBL and CBL heights for the forest site (DVM) were a little higher than those at the coastal site (TWU) both at dawn and during the daytime on 4 August. Because 4 August 2015 was clear in the forest area, the CBL heights were relatively higher (2400 m) than those on 5 August (1700 m), when it was partly cloudy. The CBL heights of TWU and DMV on 5 August were the same. Air over TWU may have been affected by the inland forest at that time. The SBL heights at dawn were 400 m in TWU and 500 m in DMV. Wind speeds at both sites were approximately 0.2–0.5 m s−1 at dawn and 0.8–1.2 m s−1 during the daytime, and the wind speed in TWU was a little stronger (0.3–0.5 m s−1) than that in DMV.
According to Wofsy et al. (1988), the SBL was reported to be about 300 m in the early morning in the Amazon forest area. Because DMV is a valley, the apparent SBL height may have been higher than that for the case of a flat plane forest. But as explained in the next section, this height of the boundary layer was consistent with the CO2 concentration profile.
CO2 vertical profiles
3.1.3.
Fig. 5 shows vertical CO2 profiles from the ground to 4000 m in altitude and the SBL and CBL heights in Hokkaido (a and b), Iriomote (c and d), and Borneo (e and f) at dawn (a, c and e) and during the daytime (b, d and f). CO2 data and altitude data were adopted as average values for the period when CO2 sondes measured the sample air for 40 s. So, the data were plotted at intervals of 200–300 m.

Fig. 5.
Vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2 concentrations at (a) 05:00 on 7 September 2012 in Hokkaido, (b) 14:00 on 7 September 2012 in Hokkaido, (c) 06:00 on 26 September 2013 in Iriomote, (d) 14:00 on 25 and 28 September 2013 in Iriomote, (e) 07:00 on 5 and 6 August 2015 in Borneo, and (f) 14:00 on 4 and 5 August 2015 in Borneo. Solid lines show the upwind sites (Hokkaido and Iriomote) and coast site (Borneo), and dashed lines show the downwind sites (Hokkaido and Iriomote) and forest site (Borneo).
Hokkaido
3.1.3.1.
At dawn in Hokkaido (Fig. 5a), CO2 concentrations inside the SBL at the downwind site showed relatively higher values than those above the SBL, while the CO2 concentrations inside the SBL at the upwind site were almost the same as those above the SBL. At daytime in Hokkaido (Fig. 5b), the vertical profile of CO2 showed lower concentrations below 500 m at only the downwind site. This was a major signal of the forest sink in the daytime along the air mass pathway from east to west.
We could recognize that the CO2 profile had another low concentration layer from the CBL height (1500 m) to 3000 m at both the upwind site and the downwind site. It seemed that air above the CBL and air just below the CBL had mixed somewhere. However, this signal mainly existed above the CBL and both sites had a similar layer. So, the low CO2 layer from 1500 to 3000 m might have been influenced by the regional Siberian forest sink, as derived from the trajectory analysis showing that the air mass originated from Siberia (data not shown).
Iriomote
3.1.3.2.
At dawn in Iriomote (Fig. 5c), CO2 inside the SBL at both the upwind site and downwind site showed relatively higher concentrations than those above the SBL. Furthermore, the concentration inside the SBL at the downwind site was 1 ppm higher than the concentration at the upwind site, thus demonstrating the outflow of CO2 from the island. At daytime in Iriomote (Fig. 5d), CO2 concentrations inside the CBL at the downwind site on both 25 and 28 September showed decreasing profiles with altitude from the CBL height to the ground, while the concentrations at the upwind site showed no such profile. Yamamoto et al. (1996) reported on the distribution of CO2 concentrations around Iriomote Island using a small air plane and found that the difference in concentrations between the upwind area and downwind area at a certain level (200–1000 m) were 2–4 ppm, which was almost the same level as our sonde observation.
On both days, weather was rather unstable because there was a small typhoon located in the Pacific several hundreds of kilometers away from the island. Therefore, the CO2 profile seemed unclear above the CBL. Relatively large variation was detected, despite the fact that the precision of the CO2 sonde was estimated to be about 1 ppm at higher altitudes such as 2000 m. As seen in the profile of SHM in Fig. 4d, the structure of air layers on 25 September was different from that on 28 September. In the case of 25 September, free tropospheric air came down to 2500 m and another layer existed in the region between the CBL (1000 m) and 2500 m, but on 28 September, air at the lower altitude seemed to be lifted up to 4000 m by the typhoon. However, such differences above the CBL were not taken into consideration during the calculation of the surface CO2 flux because our measurements (within 1 h) were considerably shorter than such regional climatic phenomena.
Borneo
3.1.3.3.
At dawn in Borneo (Fig. 5e), CO2 inside the SBL at both the coast site and the forest site on both 5 and 6 August showed a strong accumulation trend for CO2 near the ground. Especially, the CO2 concentrations at the forest site were 60–80 ppm higher inside the SBL than those at the coast site. At daytime in Borneo (Fig. 5f), CO2 inside the CBL at the forest site on both August 4 and 5 was about 6 ppm lower than the concentration above the CBL, which suggests that the tropical rain forest can absorb CO2 very strongly during the daytime. On the other hand, the CO2 on the ground at the coast site displayed rather higher concentrations compared to those at higher levels even in the daytime.
The CO2 concentrations inside the CBL at the downwind sites and the forest sites in Hokkaido, Iriomote and Borneo were always lower during the daytime and higher at dawn than those above the SBL, as well as those inside the CBL at the upwind sites or at the coast site. The difference in the averaged CO2 concentration inside the CBL between the coast site and the forest site of Borneo during the daytime was 6.4 ppm, which was much higher than the difference between the upwind site and the downwind site of Hokkaido (0.5 ppm) and Iriomote (1.2 ppm) (Table 3). In addition, the coast and forest site difference for the averaged CO2 concentration inside the SBL above Borneo at dawn was 24.4 ppm, which was much larger than the differences at Hokkaido (4.5 ppm) and Iriomote (0.5 ppm).
Chou et al. (2002) reported that atmospheric CO2 concentrations in the vicinity of the ground in the forest at dawn and daytime were relatively higher and lower respectively than the upper air. Wofsy et al. (1988) found that CO2 concentrations from the ground to an altitude of 1500 m over the forest were approximately 5 ppm lower than those over the ocean in daytime, while CO2 concentrations above 1500 m over the forest and ocean showed no difference.
In the case of Hokkaido, the observed air masses were considered to pass across the forest that was distributed between the upwind site and the downwind site because the CO2 sonde launched from the upwind site passed through the downwind site after 30 min (Fig. 3). The differences in CO2 concentration between the upwind site and the downwind site were presumed to be caused by photosynthesis and respiration of the forest, as there was little influence from anthropogenic emissions.
On the other hand, in Borneo, the differences in the CO2 concentration between dawn and daytime and between the coast site and the forest site reflect the influence from vertical mixing of the air, and the atmospheric transport for the horizontal direction was presumed to be very small (monthly averaged wind speed near the ground at these sites was approximately 1 m s−1). However, at the coastal area (Tawau airport area, where there is no forest, only some vegetation cover on the ground), there seemed to be slight CO2 emissions even in daytime.
Measurements by the multi-site continuous CO2 monitors
3.2.
CO2 daily variation on the ground during the observation periods of the CO2 sonde experiments
3.2.1.
Hourly averaged CO2 concentrations and hourly wind directions on the ground at the three sites around the date when we launched the CO2 sondes (Hokkaido: 6–8 September 2012, Iriomote: 25–28 September 2013, Borneo: 4–6 August 2015) are shown in Fig. 6. The footprint size of each site was estimated at about 10–50 km in diameter from the wind speed. CO2 data from the reference sites were also plotted in this figure so that comparisons could be made to the CO2 concentrations in daytime when the air was well mixed.

Fig. 6.
Diurnal variations of CO2 concentrations (solid lines) and wind direction (dashed lines) near the ground in (a) Hokkaido on 6–8 September 2012, (b) Iriomote on 25–28 September 2013 and (c) Borneo on 4–6 August 2015. The black lines show the background CO2 concentrations obtained from (a) Cape Ochiishi on 6–8 September 2012, (b) Hateruma Island on 25–28 September 2013 and (c) shipboard measurements taken on 19 August 2015 at 5°N, 148°E. Arrows indicate the time for the launch of the CO2 sonde.
Hokkaido
3.2.1.1.
The CO2 daily variation at TSO in Hokkaido was fairly small, while variation at the inland site TKB was relatively large (Fig. 6a). Because TSO was always the upwind site during the sonde observations and the wind came from the Sea of Japan, we observed maritime air at TSO and the CO2 concentration was considerably stable. CO2 concentrations on 6 and 8 September at TSO seemed to be very similar to the CO2 concentrations at COI. Therefore, CO2 concentrations observed at TSO could be treated as the regional background level.
On the other hand, since TKB and HTB were always the downwind sites during 6–7 September, CO2 concentrations varied here because of the influence of the forest along the air pathways. These data showed lower concentrations in daytime than those at TSO. It is reasonable that HTB had much lower concentrations than TKB because HTB exhibits a longer distance over the forest sink along the wind pathway than TKB. Sonde experiments also showed similar CO2 concentrations to the continuous measurements at the ground level at both the TSO and TKB sites.
Iriomote
3.2.1.2.
CO2 concentrations in daytime at HIM and KMI in Iriomote Island were almost the same as those of the reference site HAT, which displayed approximate background concentrations over this region, while the SHM site showed about 5 ppm lower concentrations than those of HAT; the FUR site also showed lower concentrations, especially on 28 September (Fig. 6b). This was because the background maritime air came from the E–SE direction on this particular day, while the air masses over FUR and SHM seemed to have been influenced by the forest. Such a relationship was consistent with the sonde experiments.
CO2 concentrations increased throughout the night from sunset to dawn at all sites, even at the upwind sites, because the total surface wind became weak at sunset and land breezes probably carried the air containing the land respiration signal. However, if we look closely at the data from midnight to morning, the concentrations at night in the downwind sites (FUR and SHM) were relatively higher than those in the upwind sites (HIM and KMI). Interestingly, CO2 in SHM, which is an outlet site for the wind, showed much slower decreasing rates in concentrations after sunrise than those at the other sites, as if accumulated CO2 over the island was swept away with the dominant wind, and at the same time, the concentration decreased towards afternoon through the forest sink process and the vertical mixing of the air. However, the upwind sites (HIM and KMI) showed sudden decreases in CO2 concentrations to background levels with the change of wind direction and no change after that until sunset.
Borneo
3.2.1.3.
In the case of the Borneo site, CO2 concentrations were monitored at TWU and DMV. At DMV, the continuous monitoring site and sonde experimental site were slightly different, as mentioned in the experimental section. As a result, we may have taken air at a little higher level than SBL at DMV.
As seen in Fig. 6c, CO2 concentrations on 4–5 August at the TWU site in the daytime were generally 6–10 ppm higher than the background level in the Pacific taken by the ship observations. Such a CO2 built-up phenomenon at the surface level was also seen in the sonde experiment, as shown in Fig. 5f. However, the CO2 concentration on 6 August at the TWU site in the daytime was similar to the background level because the oceanic air came from the ocean side.
The DMV forest site showed considerably lower concentrations on 4–6 August in daytime, thus suggesting that the tropical rain forest can strongly uptake CO2 from the air. This concentration decrease (7–12 ppm) was almost the same as the level observed by the sonde experiment. On the other hand, because the air sampling height at DMV was relatively higher (490 m) than that at the other site and the altitude was almost same as SBL, strong accumulation (e.g. over 100 ppm) of CO2 in SBL, which was observed in the sonde experiment, could not be observed.
The coastal sites where the CO2 daily variation was relatively small or the CO2 concentration during the daytime was almost the same as that at the reference (background) site were all locations that were influenced by air masses from the ocean (TSO, HIM, KMI and TWU). On the other hand, the sites where the CO2 daily variation was relatively large or the CO2 concentration during the daytime was lower than that at the reference site (TKB, HTB, FUR, SHM and DMV) were influenced by the forest CO2 sinks and emissions. Therefore, with results from measurements of the diurnal variation by ground-based continuous CO2 monitors at multiple sites, we were largely able to see the forest sink signals by looking at the wind direction and comparing the CO2 levels in daytime to those at regional reference (background) sites. This method is very simple for detecting the forest sink signals in comparison to vertical profile measurements.
The general relationship between CO2 and wind direction according to the observations collected over several years
3.2.2.
To generalize the forest photosynthesis signal in terms of the air CO2 signal observed at the ground sites, we calculated the ΔCO2, which is the difference in CO2 concentration from the background site at 14:00; furthermore, we confirmed the relevance of the ΔCO2 and the wind direction at the site. The average ΔCO2 values during the daytime (14:00) for the observation periods (Hokkaido: August–September 2012 and July–September 2013, Iriomote: July–September 2013, 2014 and 2015, Borneo: July–September 2015) are shown in Fig. 7, and data were classified into four wind direction categories (north = NW–N–NE, south = SE–S–SW, east = NE–E–SE and west = SW–W–NW).

Fig. 7.
Differences in CO2 concentration from the background level at 2 pm (ΔCO2) as a function of wind direction at (1) TSO, (2) TKB, (3) HTB, (4) HIM, (5) KMI, (6) FUR, (7) SHM, (8) TWU and (9) DMV. The median value (the line in the box), inner 50th percentile of the value (box), and inner 95th percentile of the value (bars) for the ΔCO2 are shown. The observational data used here were collected from August to September 2012 and from July to September 2013 in Hokkaido, from July to September 2013, 2014 and 2015 in Iriomote, and from July to September 2015 in Borneo, and we used all of the data from the above observation periods when we produced Fig. 8. For the wind direction analysis, north includes NW–N–NE, east includes NE–E–SE, south includes SE–S–SW and west includes SW–W–NW.
The data for ΔCO2 in Hokkaido are shown in Fig. 7a. The ΔCO2 for TSO showed negative values when the wind direction was north, east and south, while the ΔCO2 was about zero when the wind direction was west. The ΔCO2 for TKB showed negative values in all wind directions. The ΔCO2 for HTB showed negative values when the wind direction was north, south and west, and it was about zero when the wind direction was east. Thus, it seemed to be a general rule that ΔCO2 was about zero when the wind (or air mass) came directly from the sea and ΔCO2 was always negative when the wind (or air mass) passed over the forest in northern Hokkaido. Additionally, the ΔCO2 of TKB, which is located in the inland forest area, showed negative values regardless of the differences in wind direction.
The data for ΔCO2 in Iriomote and Borneo are shown in Fig. 7b and c, respectively. Both sites had the same observational results as were seen in the case of northern Hokkaido. In the case of Iriomote, four sites clearly showed reasonable differences in the wind direction for the negative case. In the case of TWU in Borneo, large negative values were seen in the cases of north, east and west wind directions, but not for the south direction. For DMV, ΔCO2 during the daytime was always negative.
Thus, the observation network on the ground, which consists of continuous CO2 measurement equipment at multiple sites around the forest, was able to capture the phenomenon of about 1–10 ppm decreases in atmospheric CO2 concentrations during the daytime at the surface level caused by photosynthesis of the forest. The differences in CO2 concentration between the upwind site and the downwind site in Hokkaido and Iriomote occurred because of photosynthesis and respiration of the forest along the flight path from the upwind site to the downwind site (Fig. 3). Therefore, theoretically speaking, the average CO2 flux of the forests could be calculated from the differences in CO2 concentration between the upwind site and the downwind site, the wind conditions, and some estimation of the vertical profile from the SBL and CBL height.
Estimation of the CO2 flux from vertical profile data
3.3.
On the basis of observational results for CO2 vertical profiles collected by CO2 sondes and CO2 concentrations on the ground collected by continuous CO2 measurements, the differences in CO2 concentrations between the upwind site and the downwind site represent the influence of the forest between the two sites. First, we calculated the average CO2 flux of the forest in Hokkaido and Iriomote by Equation (1) based on the box model shown in Fig. 8a. This model calculates the CO2 flux from the differences in CO2 concentrations between the upwind site and the downwind site as follows:

Fig. 8.
Box model for the estimation of the CO2 flux in (a) Hokkaido and Iriomote and (b) Borneo. (a) F is the CO2 flux (μmol m−2 s−1); UC i and DC i are the CO2 concentrations (ppm) in the i-th layer of the vertical profiles at the U (upwind site) and D (downwind site), respectively; Uh n and Dh m corresponds to the CBL height (m) at the U and D sites (Table 3) (usually they are set equal); ρ i is the molar air density (mol m−3); WS is the average wind speed of layers under CBL (m s−1) obtained from the flight path of the sonde; and Dis is the distance between the upwind site (or coast) and downwind site (m). (b) F is the CO2 flux (μmol m−2 s−1); C i (t) and C i (t + ∆t) are the CO2 concentration (ppm); h i (t) and h i (t + ∆t) are the height (m) of the i-th layer at the moment of t and t + ∆t, respectively; h n (t) is the same as h m (t + ∆t), corresponding to the CBL height (m) (Table 3); ρ i (t) and ρ i (t + ∆t) are the molar air density (mol m−3); and ∆t is 7 h or 17 h.
Here, F is the CO2 flux (μmol m−2 s−1); UC i and DC i are the CO2 concentrations (ppm) of the i-th layer of the vertical profiles at the U (upwind) site and D (downwind) site, respectively; and Uh i and Dh i are the height (m) of the i-th layer where UC i and DC i were measured, respectively. Furthermore, ρ i is the molar air density (mol m−3) in the i-th layer. The planetary boundary layer (PBL) heights (SBL or CBL) (m) are indicated as Uh n and Dh m for the upwind site and downwind site, respectively, which were usually the same in our case, as shown in Table 3. However, because the data interval in terms of height was a little different for each observation, we used a different layer number for the CO2 profiles at the U-site and D-site (i.e. n and m). WS is the average wind speed in the SBL or CBL (m s−1), which was calculated from the flight distance of the CO2 sonde. Dis is the distance (m) between the upwind site and downwind site.
For TWU and DMV in Borneo, the differences in CO2 concentrations between dawn and daytime were assumed to occur only as result of photosynthesis and respiration of the forest around each site because TWU and DMV did not have an upwind site and downwind site relationship as did the Japanese sites (Fig. 3); moreover, the average wind speed was very weak (only 1 m s−1). The average CO2 flux in Borneo was calculated by Equation (2) based on the box model in Fig. 8b), which was created on the basis of Culf et al. (1997) from the differences in CO2 concentrations between dawn and daytime as follows:
Here, F is the CO2 flux (μmol m−2 s−1); C i (t) and C i (t + ∆t) represent the CO2 concentration (ppm); h i (t) and h i (t + ∆t) are the height (m) of the i-th layer at the moment of time t and t + ∆t, respectively; h n (t) is the same as h m (t + ∆t), corresponding to either the CBL height (m) at a time of t or t + ∆t (Table 3); ρ i (t) and ρ i (t + ∆t) are the molar air density (mol m−3) at that moment; and ∆t is 7 h (from 07:00 to 14:00) or 17 h (from 14:00 to 07:00) (s). In this case, flux F is the average value during ∆t.
The estimated CO2 fluxes of the forests in Hokkaido, Iriomote and Borneo are summarized in Table 4. The CO2 flux at dawn and daytime were 11.8 and −14.4 (μmol m−2 s−1) in Hokkaido, and 3.9 and −11.8 to −15.0 (ave: −13.4) in Iriomote, respectively. The CO2 fluxes from daytime to the next dawn and from dawn to daytime in Borneo were 3.2 to 4.0 (ave: 3.6) and −10.3 at TWU (coast site) and 16.0 to 16.9 (ave: 16.5) and −37.7 at DMV (forest site), respectively. We also calculated the CO2 flux for layers from the surface to the SBL and CBL height + 100 m in altitude and from the surface to the SBL and CBL height – 100 m (Table 4). The values of CO2 flux changed 46% in Hokkaido, 36% in Iriomote and 6% in Borneo when the SBL and CBL height changed ± 100 m. The values in Hokkaido and Iriomote were largely dependent on the SBL and CBL height.
Table 4.
Estimated CO2 flux in the three forests.
The values of CO2 flux at dawn and daytime at all sites were positive and negative, respectively, and the absolute values at daytime were higher than those at dawn. The CO2 flux of DMV in Borneo was 4 times higher than that at TWU. This may suggest that the atmosphere around the DMV site was strongly influenced by photosynthesis and respiration from the tropical rain forest. Furthermore, the CO2 flux at DMV was approximately three times higher than that at Hokkaido and Iriomote, which is reflective of the relatively large density of biomass. This difference was fairly consistent with other data suggesting that the amount of biomass per unit area of Borneo is about 300 MgC ha−1 (e.g. Saatchi et al., 2011), which is a value about three times larger than that in the northern Hokkaido region (about 80–100 MgC ha−1 around TKB) (e.g. Takagi et al., 2015).
We compared our results in Hokkaido with the CO2 flux measured by the eddy-covariance method around TKB (Takagi et al., 2009) on the same day (Fig. 9). The values for the CO2 flux in this study were mostly the same as the values derived by the eddy-covariance method. Thus, our method, which involves measuring the differences in the vertical CO2 profiles inside the SBL and CBL between an upwind site and downwind site using CO2 sondes, can reasonably calculate the CO2 flux for a region.

Fig. 9.
CO2 flux estimated by this study and by the eddy-covariance method in Hokkaido on 7 September 2012. This study’s values were calculated from the differences in CO2 concentrations between the upwind site and downwind site. The values from the eddy-covariance method were observed at the Teshio Experimental Forest of Hokkaido University near the TKB site (Takagi et al., 2009). Error bars of the eddy-covariance in the figure show the random sampling error in each flux as determined in accordance with Finkelstein and Sims (2001).
We also compared the CO2 fluxes at Iriomote and Borneo obtained in this study with the previous flux data measured at the same or similar places (i.e. Iriomote, Amazon and Pasoh) (Fig. 10). Yamamoto et al. (1996) estimated the CO2 flux from aircraft observations of CO2 around Iriomote Island on March and November 1991 and July 1992 and reported that the CO2 fluxes around 06:00 and around noon were 2.9 and −3.1 to −15.2 μmol m−2 s−1, respectively. Those values are almost the same as the values from our study (06:00: 3.9, 14:00: −11.8 to −15.0 μmol m−2 s−1) at the end of September in Iriomote. The CO2 fluxes (μmol m−2 s−1) in August, which were measured by the eddy-covariance method in the Amazon (Wu et al., 2016) and Pasoh in the Malay Peninsula (Kosugi et al., 2008) were compared with the DMV’s CO2 flux. Although note that the environmental conditions such as climate, vegetation type and carbon stocks (Gibbs et al., 2007) of the Amazon are different from those of Borneo. The CO2 flux of DMV in Borneo at dawn showed a value of 16.0 to 16.9 (ave: 16.5) and these data were within the values of CO2 fluxes in the Amazon (ave: 5.5, min: −6.6, max: 22.9) and Pasoh (ave: 4.9, min: −14.8, max: 28.1). The values of DMV’s CO2 flux during the daytime (−37.7) were close to the minimum values of the CO2 fluxes of the Amazon (ave: −13.5, min: −31.0, max: 1.3) and Pasoh (ave: −17.6, min: −35.4, max: 0.2). As a result, the CO2 flux of DMV’s forest in this season is estimated to be almost the same or larger than the forest flux at the Amazon and Pasoh.

Fig. 10.
Comparison of the estimated CO2 fluxes obtained in this study and in previous studies.
aCO2 flux at Iriomote from noon to 17:00 in March and November 1991 and July 1992 (Yamamoto et al., 1996). bSame as a but from 05:00 to 07:00 in July 1992. cHourly CO2 flux at 05:00 in the Santarem-km67-Primary Forest, Amazon (latitude: 2°51′24.1″S, longitude: 54°57′32.0″W), in August from 2002 to 2011 (though data for 2006 and 2007 are not included) (Ameriflux, http://ameriflux.lbl.gov/data/download-data/). dHourly CO2 flux at 06:00 on the Pasoh Forest Reserve, Malay Peninsula (latitude: 2°58′14.6″N, longitude: 102°17′57.8″E), in August from 2003 to 2009 (Asiaflux, https://db.cger.nies.go.jp/asiafluxdb/?page_id=16). eSame as c but for noon. fSame as d but for noon.
Therefore, it is apparent that the approximate value of the instant net CO2 flux can be calculated by the differences in CO2 concentrations obtained from measuring the vertical CO2 profiles along upwind sites and downwind sites or along a time course such as from dawn to daytime in the tropical forest.
Conclusion
4.
We performed two types of observations in three different forests, which were, in Borneo Island, Hokkaido Island and Iriomote Island in the summers of 2012–2015. One method involved measuring vertical CO2 profiles over the forest using CO2 sondes, and the other method involved continuous measurements of surface CO2 concentrations at multiple sites in and around the forest.
CO2 sonde observations showed a clear signal from the effect of respiration and photosynthesis by the forest in the vertical CO2 profiles at each site. Especially, the tropical rain forest of Borneo showed a large sink signal in the profile. For instance, average CO2 concentrations in the SBL and CBL of the DMV forest site in Borneo at dawn and daytime showed values that were 24.4 ppm higher and 6.4 ppm lower than those at the coast site TWU, respectively. Meanwhile, the CO2 concentrations of the downwind sites in Hokkaido and Iriomote at dawn and daytime were 0.5–4.5 ppm higher and 0.5–1.4 ppm lower, respectively, than those at the upwind sites, which suggests that the emission and uptake rates were relatively smaller than those in the tropical rain forest.
To confirm the signals of forest uptake and emission obtained by the sonde technology, we installed multiple continuous CO2 measurement equipment in and around the forest and performed continuous observations of CO2 concentrations on the ground in conjunction with the sonde observations. The sites that received oceanic air masses generally showed levels similar to regional background levels of CO2. On the other hand, if the site was located downwind from the forest, a large daily variation was found corresponding to forest respiration at night and uptake during the daytime.
The findings for CO2 concentrations around the forest showed systematic wind dependency. If we compared the CO2 concentration at a site to the regional background level, forest uptake always decreased the CO2 concentration at the downwind sites during the daytime to about 1–10 ppm lower than the background level values, while forest respiration increased the CO2 concentration at night by about 20–30 ppm. In the case of Borneo, the investigated forest was so large in relation to the wind speed effects that the experimental sites were not located along the pathway of the air mass. However, we did see a large difference in the CO2 daily variation between the forest site (DMV) and the coast site (TWU). Similarly, to other forests, coastal sites showed almost background CO2 levels in daytime when the air came from the sea side, but the forest sites always showed 3–9 ppm lower concentrations than the Pacific background concentration in the daytime and with any wind direction. These findings indicate that the ground level CO2 concentration can clearly show the forest CO2 flux signal, and they also indicate that the CO2 concentration always has a distinct local spatial distribution around the forest.
We estimated CO2 fluxes in Hokkaido, Iriomote and Borneo from the differences of CO2 vertical profiles between the sites or times according to the CO2 sonde observations. CO2 uptake (μmol m−2 s−1) during the daytime at the forest site in Borneo was −37.7, which was four times larger than that at the coast site (−10.3) of Borneo and three times larger than the rate at the forest in Hokkaido (−14.4) and Iriomote (−13.4). The CO2 emission at dawn for the forest site in Borneo showed a value of 16.5, which was higher than that at the coast site (3.6) in Borneo, that in Hokkaido (11.8) and that in Iriomote (3.9). These values were compared with previously reported values obtained by other methods such as aeroplane measurements and the eddy-covariance method at similar locations including the Pasoh forest in Malay and the Amazon. We found that the flux estimated by the sonde observations in different types of forests showed good agreement with previous data.
Therefore, we concluded that sonde observations for vertical profile measurements over forest areas and additional multi-site CO2 monitoring around the forest could provide fairy good flux estimations even in tropical rain forests. Sondes are relatively easy to operate and require small amounts of manpower compared to aircraft observations. Thus, this method should be valuable to use over relatively large regional forests. In future studies, it would be worthwhile to compare such sonde data to eddy-covariance flux measurements and inverse flux calculations over the same large regional forest tracts.
In the near future, usage of satellite CO2 measurement data will likely become commonplace for regional CO2 flux measurements, even for the MRV (measuring, reporting and verifying) activities associated with REDD+ efforts in many forested countries. From the results of this study, we could estimate that the CO2 concentration in the PBL at daytime over the SE Asian tropical rain forest site was about 6–7 ppm lower than the background level because of photosynthesis by the forest, and this signal could be detected by satellite observations (i.e. GOSAT) even though this region is always covered by clouds. On the other hand, for Hokkaido (subarctic region) and Iriomote (subtropical region), the difference between the site and background was around 1 ppm, which will require higher analytical precision (<0.5 ppm), which is a target of GOSAT-2.
In the future, it will be important to use different kinds of techniques such as sondes, aircraft and satellites to evaluate regional forest fluxes, which are presently measured mainly by the eddy-covariance method. The sonde method will likely be the most effective for estimations of CO2 flux measurements over tropical areas where satellite observations and aircraft measurements would be relatively difficult to collect.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Funding
This work was supported by funds (Development of Monitoring Technology Related to Global Warming) from the Ministry of the Environment, Japan.
Acknowledgements
We were provided access to the observation sites from the towns of Teshio and Hamatonbetsu in Hokkaido, Teshio Experimental Forest at the Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere of Hokkaido University, Komi primary school, Shirahama primary school, Funaura junior high school, Jidou-Seito Koryu center in Iriomote and Malaysian Meteorological Department (MMD). We deeply appreciate their support. In particular, we would like to thank to Mr. Jasni Ahmad and his co-workers in the Tawau office of MMD. We also thank Dr. Scott Saleska and Dr. Yoshiko Kosugi for providing CO2 flux data for the Santarem-km67-Primary Forest and Pasoh Forest Reserve sites.
