Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Towards assimilation of wind profile observations in the atmospheric boundary layer with a sub-kilometrescale ensemble data assimilation system Cover

Towards assimilation of wind profile observations in the atmospheric boundary layer with a sub-kilometrescale ensemble data assimilation system

Open Access
|Jan 2020

References

  1. Ancell, B. C., Kashawlic, E. and Schroeder, J. L. 2015. Evaluation of wind forecasts and observation impacts from variational and ensemble data assimilation for wind energy applications. Mon. Weather Rev. 143, 32303245. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0001.1
  2. Anderson, J. L. and Anderson, S. L. 1999. A Monte Carlo implementation of the nonlinear filtering problem to produce ensemble assimilations and forecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 127, 27412758. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<;2741:AMCIOT>2.0.CO;2
  3. Baas, P. and Bosveld, F. 2010. Assimilation of Cabauw boundary layer observations in an atmospheric single-column model using an ensemble-Kalman filter. Technical report, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, Netherlands.
  4. Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M. and co-authors. 2011. Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the COSMO model: description and Sensitivities. Mon. Weather Rev. 139, 38873905. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1
  5. Bédard, J., Laroche, S. and Gauthier, P. 2015. A geo-statistical observation operator for the assimilation of near-surface wind data. QJR Meteorol. Soc. 141, 28572868. doi:10.1002/qj.2569
  6. Benjamin, S. G., Schwartz, B. E., Koch, S. E. and Szoke, E. J. 2004. The value of wind profiler data in US weather forecasting. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 85, 18711886. doi:10.1175/BAMS-85-12-1871
  7. Boutle, I., Finnenkoetter, A., Lock, A. and Wells, H. 2016. The London Model: forecasting fog at 333 m resolution. QJR Meteorol. Soc. 142, 360371. doi:10.1002/qj.2656
  8. Brümmer, B., Lange, I. and Konow, H. 2012. Atmospheric boundary layer measurements at the 280 m high Hamburg weather mast 1995-2011: mean annual and diurnal cycles. Metz. 21, 319335. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2012/0338
  9. Bundesanstalt fuer Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe. 2016. Bodenuebersichtskarte.
  10. Buzzi, M. 2008. Challenges in operational numerical weather prediction at high resolution in complex terrain. Doctoral thesis. ETH Zurich.
  11. Buzzi, M., Rotach, M. W., Holtslag, M. and Holtslag, A. A. 2011. Evaluation of the COSMO-SC turbulence scheme in a shear-driven stable boundary layer. Metz. 20, 335350. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0050
  12. Cerenzia, I. 2017. Challenges and critical aspects in stable boundary layer representation in numerical weather prediction modeling: diagnostic analyses and proposals for improvement. PhD thesis. Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna.
  13. Declair, S., Stephan, K. and Potthast, R. 2015. On the improvement of numerical weather prediction by assimilation of hub height wind information in convection-resulted models. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vol. 17, Vienna, Austria, 9451.
  14. Desroziers, G., Berre, L., Chapnik, B. and Poli, P. 2005. Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis-error statistics in observation space. QJR Meteorol. Soc. 131, 33853396. doi:10.1256/qj.05.108
  15. Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R. and co-authors. 2007. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys. 45, RG2004, doi:10.1029/2005RG000183
  16. Gaspari, G. and Cohn, S. E. 1999. Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. QJR Meteorol Soc. 125, 723757. doi:10.1002/qj.49712555417
  17. Harlim, J. and Hunt, B. R. 2007. Four-dimensional local ensemble transform Kalman filter: numerical experiments with a global circulation model. Tellus A 59, 731748. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00255.x
  18. Hasager, C. B., Stein, D., Courtney, M., Peña, A., Mikkelsen, T. and co-authors. 2013. Hub height ocean winds over the north sea observed by the NORSEWInD Lidar Array: measuring techniques, quality control and data management. Remote Sens. 5, 42804303. doi:10.3390/rs5094280
  19. Heinze, R., Dipankar, A., Henken, C. C., Moseley, C., Sourdeval, O. and co-authors. 2017. Large-eddy simulations over Germany using ICON: a comprehensive evaluation. QJR Meteorol. Soc. 143, 69100. doi:10.1002/qj.2947
  20. Herzog, H.-J., Vogel, G. and Schubert, U. 2002. LLM – a nonhydrostatic model applied to high-resolving simulations of turbulent fluxes over heterogeneous terrain. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 73, 6786. doi:10.1007/s00704-002-0694-4
  21. Houtekamer, P. L., Mitchell, H. L., Pellerin, G., Buehner, M., Charron, M. and co-authors. 2005. Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter: results with real observations. Mon. Weather Rev. 133, 604620. doi:10.1175/MWR-2864.1
  22. Houtekamer, P. L. and Zhang, F. 2016. Review of the ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon. Weather Rev. 144, 44894532. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-15-0440.1
  23. Hu, H., Sun, J. and Zhang, Q. 2017. Assessing the impact of surface and wind profiler data on fog forecasting using WRF 3DVAR: an OSSE study on a dense fog event over North China. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 56, 10591081. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0246.1
  24. Hunt, B., Kalnay, E., Kostelich, E., Ott, E., Patil, D. and co-authors. 2004. Four-dimensional ensemble Kalman filtering. Tellus A 56, 273277. doi:10.3402/tellusa.v56i4.14424
  25. Hunt, B. R., Kostelich, E. J. and Szunyogh, I. 2007. Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: a local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Physica D 230, 112126. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2006.11.008
  26. Ingleby, B. 2015. Global assimilation of air temperature, humidity, wind and pressure from surface stations. QJR Meteorol. Soc. 141, 504517. doi:10.1002/qj.2372
  27. Keil, M., Bock, M. and Esch, T. ( 2011. ). CORINE Land Cover 2006 - Europaweit harmonisierte Aktualisierung der Landbedeckungsdaten für Deutschland. Technical report, Umweltbundesamt.
  28. Kleczek, M. A., Steeneveld, G.-J. and Holtslag, A. A. M. 2014. Evaluation of the weather research and forecasting mesoscale model for GABLS3: impact of boundary-layer schemes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 152, 213243. doi:10.1007/s10546-014-9925-3
  29. Miyoshi, T. 2005. Ensemble Kalman filter experiments with a primitive-equation global model. PhD thesis, University of Maryland.
  30. Mylonas, M., Barbouchi, S., Herrmann, H. and Nastos, P. 2018. Sensitivity analysis of observational nudging methodology to reduce error in wind resource assessment (WRA) in the North Sea. Renewable Energy 120, 446456. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.088
  31. NASA JPL. 2013. NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 3 arc second [Data set].
  32. Park, S.-Y., Lee, H.-W., Lee, S.-H. and Kim, D.-H. 2010. Impact of wind profiler data assimilation on wind field assessment over coastal areas. Asian J. Atmos. Environ. 4, 198210. doi:10.5572/ajae.2010.4.3.198
  33. Rostkier-Edelstein, D. and Hacker, J. P. 2013. Impact of flow dependence, column covariance, and forecast model type on surface-observation assimilation for probabilistic PBL profile nowcasts. Wea. Forecasting 28, 2954. doi:10.1175/WAF-D-12-00043.1
  34. Schraff, C., Reich, H., Rhodin, A., Schomburg, A., Stephan, K. and co-authors. 2016. Kilometre-scale ensemble data assimilation for the COSMO model (KENDA). QJR Meteorol. Soc. 142, 14531472. doi:10.1002/qj.2748
  35. Schrodin, R. and Heise, E. 2001. The Multi-Layer Version of the DWD Soil Model TERRA-LM. Technical Report 2, Deutscher Wetterdienst.
  36. St-James, J. S. and Laroche, S. 2005. Assimilation of wind profiler data in the Canadian Meteorological Centre Analysis Systems. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 22, 11811194. doi:10.1175/JTECH1765.1
  37. Steiner, A., Köhler, C., V. and Schumann, J. 2014. EWeLiNE and ORKA: improving model physics for renewable energy. COSMO User Seminar 2014, Offenbach, 15.
  38. Stull, R. B., eds. 1988. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences Library. Springer, Dordrecht.
  39. van Stratum, B. J. H. and Stevens, B. 2015. The influence of misrepresenting the nocturnal boundary layer on idealized daytime convection in large-eddy simulation. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 7, 423436. doi:10.1002/2014MS000370
  40. Wagner, R., Jørgensen, H. E., Paulsen, U. S., Larsen, T. J., Antoniou, I. and co-authors. 2008. Remote sensing used for power curves. IOP Conf. Ser: Earth Environ. Sci. 1, 012059. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1/1/012059
  41. Winkler, J., Denhard, M., Frank, H., Rhodin, A., Anlauf, H. and co-authors. 2018. ICON-EPS: the operational global ensemble forecasting system of DWD. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vol. 20, Vienna, Austria, 13813.
  42. Yang, S.-C., Kalnay, E., Hunt, B. and Bowler, N. E. 2009. Weight interpolation for efficient data assimilation with the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter. QJR Meteorol. Soc. 135, 251262. doi:10.1002/qj.353
Language: English
Page range: 1764307 - 1764307
Published on: Jan 1, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Tobias Sebastian Finn, Gernot Geppert, Felix Ament, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.