Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of observability Gramian to targeted observation in WRF data assimilation Cover

Application of observability Gramian to targeted observation in WRF data assimilation

Open Access
|Jan 2020

References

  1. Baker, N. and Daley, R. 2000. Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation‐targeting problem. QJR. Meteorol. Soc. 126, 14311454. doi:10.1002/qj.49712656511
  2. Barker, D. M., Huang, W., Guo, Y. R. and Bourgeois, A. 2003. A three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) data assimilation system for use with MM5. NCAR Tech Note, NCAR/TN-453 + STR, 68. pp.
  3. Barker, D., Huang, X.-Y., Liu, Z., Auligné, T., Zhang, X. and co-authors. 2012. The weather research and forecasting model's community variational/ensemble data assimilation system: WRFDA. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 93, 831843. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00167.1
  4. Buizza, R., Cardinali, C., Kelly, G. and Thépaut, J. 2007. The value of observations. II: the value of observations located in singular‐vector‐based target areas. QJR. Meteorol. Soc. 133, 18171832. doi:10.1002/qj.149
  5. Cardinali, C., Buizza, R., Kelly, G., Shapiro, M. and Thépaut, J. 2007. The value of observations. III: influence of weather regimes on targeting. QJR. Meteorol. Soc. 133, 18331842. doi:10.1002/qj.148
  6. Carrassi, A., Trevisan, A. and Uboldi, F. 2007. Adaptive observations and assimilation in the unstable subspace by breeding on the data‐assimilation system. Tellus 59A, 101113.
  7. Enomoto, S. 2006. Estimation of wind power generation using weather forecast model. Wind Energy 30, 4956 (in Japanese).
  8. Kang, W. and Xu, L. 2009. Computational analysis of control systems using dynamic optimization. Available online at arXiv:0906.0215v2.
  9. Kang, W. and Xu, L. 2012. Optimal placement of mobile sensors for data assimilations. Tellus A: Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 64, 17133. doi:10.3402/tellusa.v64i0.17133
  10. Kelly, G., Thépaut, J., Buizza, R. and Cardinali, C. 2007. The value of observations. I: Data denial experiments for the Atlantic and the Pacific. QJR. Meteorol. Soc. 133, 18031815. doi:10.1002/qj.150
  11. King, S. A., Kang, W. and Xu, L. 2013. Partial observability for the shallow water equations. In: Proceedings of SIAM Conference on Control & Its Applications, San Diego, CA.
  12. Krener, A. J. and Ide, K. 2009. Measures of unobservability. In: IEEE Proceedings of Conference on Decision and Control, Shanghai, China, pp. 64016406.
  13. Langland, R. H. and Baker, N. L. 2004. Estimation of observation impact using the NRL atmospheric variational data assimilation adjoint system. Tellus 56A, 189201.
  14. Li, H., Kalnay, E. and Miyoshi, T. 2009. Simultaneous estimation of covariance inflation and observation errors within an ensemble Kalman filter. QJR. Meteorol. Soc. 135, 523533. doi:10.1002/qj.371
  15. Liu, J. and Kalnay, E. 2008. Estimating observation impact without adjoint model in an ensemble Kalman filter. QJR. Meteorol. Soc. 134, 13271335. doi:10.1002/qj.280
  16. Liu, J., Kalnay, E., Miyoshi, T. and Cardinali, C. 2009. Analysis sensitivity calculation in an ensemble Kalman filter. QJR. Meteorol. Soc. 135, 18421851. doi:10.1002/qj.511
  17. Lorenz, E. N. 1963. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130141. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<;0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2
  18. Parrish, D. F. and Derber, J. C. 1992. The National Meteorological Center's spectral statistical-interpolation analysis system. Mon. Weather Rev. 120, 17471763. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<;1747:TNMCSS>2.0.CO;2
  19. Qi, J., Sun, K. and Kang, W. 2015. Optimal PMU placement for power system dynamic state estimation by using empirical observability Gramian. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30, 20412054. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2356797
  20. Qi, J., Sun, K. and Kang, W. 2016. Adaptive optimal PMU placement based on empirical observability Gramian. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49, 482487. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.211
  21. REN21. 2018. Renewables 2018 global status report. Online at: http://www.ren21.net/gsr-2018/
  22. Sirovich, L. 1987. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures, Parts I–III. Quart. Appl. Math. XLV, 561590.
  23. Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O. and Barker, D. M. and co-authors. 2008. A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475 + STR, 113. pp.
  24. Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E. 1993. Ensemble forecasting at NMC: the generation of perturbations. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 74, 23172330. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<;2317:EFANTG>2.0.CO;2
  25. Wang, W., Bruyère, C., Duda, M., Dudhia, J. and Gill, D. and co-authors 2017. ARW version 3 modeling system user’s guide. Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research. pp. 281282.
Language: English
Page range: 1697602 - 1697602
Published on: Jan 1, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Ryoichi Yoshimura, Aiko Yakeno, Takashi Misaka, Shigeru Obayashi, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.