Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Climate models disagree on the sign of total radiative feedback in the Arctic Cover

Climate models disagree on the sign of total radiative feedback in the Arctic

Open Access
|Jan 2020

References

  1. Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J. F., Boer, G. J., Christian, J. R., Denman, K. L. and co-authors. 2011. Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, n/a. doi:10.1029/2010GL046270
  2. Bao, Q., Lin, P., Zhou, T., Liu, Y., Yu, Y. and co-authors. 2013. The flexible global ocean-atmosphere-land system model, spectral version 2: Fgoals-s2. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 30, 561576. doi:10.1007/s00376-012-2113-9
  3. Bintanja, R., Graversen, R. G. and Hazeleger, W. 2011. Arctic winter warming amplified by the thermal inversion and consequent low infrared cooling to space. Nature Geosci. 4, 758761. doi:10.1038/ngeo1285
  4. Block, K. and Mauritsen, T. 2013. Forcing and feedback in the mpi-esm-lr coupled model under abruptly quadrupled co2. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 5, 676691. doi:10.1002/jame.20041
  5. Boé, J., Hall, A. and Qu, X. 2009. Current GCMs’ unrealistic negative feedback in the Arctic. J. Climate 22, 46824695. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2885.1
  6. Bony, S., Colman, R., Kattsov, V. M., Allan, R. P., Bretherton, C. S. and co-authors. 2006. How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J. Climate 19, 34453482. doi:10.1175/JCLI3819.1
  7. Colman, R. A. 2003. A comparison of climate feedbacks in GCMs. Clim. Dyn. 20, 865873. doi:10.1007/s00382-003-0310-z
  8. Colman, R. A. and McAvaney, B. J. 1997. A study of general circulation model climate feedbacks determined from perturbed sea surface temperature experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 1938319319,402. doi:10.1029/97JD00206
  9. Crook, J. A., Forster, P. M. and Stuber, N. 2011. Spatial patterns of modeled climate feedback and contributions to temperature response and polar amplification. J. Climate 24, 35753592. doi:10.1175/2011JCLI3863.1
  10. Dunne, J. P., John, J. G., Adcroft, A. J., Griffies, S. M., Hallberg, R. W. and co-authors. 2012. Gfdl’s esm2 global coupled climate-carbon earth system models. part I: Physical formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. J. Climate 25, 66466665. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00560.1
  11. Gent, P. R., Danabasoglu, G., Donner, L. J., Holland, M. M., Hunke, E. C. and co-authors. 2011. The community climate system model version 4. J. Climate 24, 49734991. doi:10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1
  12. Goosse, H., Kay, J. E., Armour, K. C., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Chepfer, H. and co-authors. 2018. Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions. Nat. Commun. 9, 1919. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04173-0
  13. Graversen, R. G. and Wang, M. 2009. Polar amplification in a coupled climate model with locked albedo. Clim. Dyn. 33, 629643. doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0535-6
  14. Graversen, R. G., Langen, P. L. and Mauritsen, T. 2014. Polar Amplification in CCSM4: Contributions from the Lapse Rate and Surface Albedo Feedbacks. J. Climate 27, 44334450. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00551.1
  15. Hall, A. 2004. The role of surface albedo feedback in climate. J. Climate 17, 15501568. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<;1550:TROSAF>2.0.CO;2
  16. Hansen, J., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Russell, G., Stone, P. and co-authors. 1984. Climate Sensitivity: Analysis of Feedback Mechanisms, AGU Geophysical Monograph 29, Maurice Ewing Vol. 5, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 130163.
  17. Holland, M. M. and Bitz, C. M. 2003. Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models. Clim. Dyn. 21, 221232. doi:10.1007/s00382-003-0332-6
  18. Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A. and co-authors. 2008. Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res 113, D13103. doi:10.1029/2008JD009944
  19. IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Iversen, T., Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Kirkevag, A. and co-authors. 2013. The Norwegian earth system model, noresm1-m - part 2: Climate response and scenario projections. Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 389415. doi:10.5194/gmd-6-389-2013
  21. Ji, D., Wang, L., Feng, J., Wu, Q., Cheng, H. and co-authors. 2014. Description and basic evaluation of Beijing normal university earth system model (bnu-esm) version 1. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 20392064. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-2039-2014
  22. Klocke, D., Quaas, J. and Stevens, B. 2013. Assessment of different metrics for physical climate feedbacks. Clim. Dyn. 41, 11731185. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1757-1
  23. Langen, P. L., Graversen, R. G. and Mauritsen, T. 2012. Separation of contributions from radiative feedbacks to polar amplification on an aquaplanet. J. Climate 25, 30103024. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00246.1
  24. Lu, J. and Cai, M. 2010. Quantifying contributions to polar warming amplification in an idealized coupled general circulation model. Clim. Dyn. 34, 669687. doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0673-x
  25. Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R. T. 1975. The effects of doubling the CO2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 315. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<;0003:TEODTC>2.0.CO;2
  26. Mauritsen, T., Graversen, R. G., Klocke, D., Langen, P. L., Stevens, B. and co-authors. 2013. Climate feedback efficiency and synergy. Clim. Dyn. 41, 25392554. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1808-7
  27. Meehl, G., Stocker, T., Collins, W., Friedlingstein, P., Gaye, A. and co-authors. 2007. Global Climate Projections. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambrigde Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K., and New York.
  28. Naakka, T., Nygård, T., Vihma, T., Sedlar, J. and Graversen, R. 2019. Atmospheric moisture transport between mid? latitudes and the arctic: Regional, seasonal and vertical distributions. Int. J. Climatol. 39, 28622879. doi:10.1002/joc.5988
  29. Payne, A. E., Jansen, M. F. and Cronin, T. W. 2015. Conceptual model analysis of the influence of temperature feedbacks on polar amplification. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 95619570. doi:10.1002/2015GL065889
  30. Pincus, R. and Stevens, B. 2013. Paths to accuracy for radiation parameterizations in atmospheric models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 5, 225233. doi:10.1002/jame.20027
  31. Pithan, F. and Mauritsen, T. 2014. Arctic Amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models. Nature Geosci. 7, 181184. doi:10.1038/ngeo2071
  32. Schmidt, G. A., Ruedy, R., Hansen, J. E., Aleinov, I., Bell, N. and co-authors. 2006. Present-day atmospheric simulations using Giss Modele: Comparison to in situ, satellite, and reanalysis data. J. Climate 19, 153192. doi:10.1175/JCLI3612.1
  33. Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I. 2010. The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification. Nature 464, 13341337. doi:10.1038/nature09051
  34. Serreze, M. C. and Francis, J. A. 2006. The Arctic Amplification debate. Clim. Change 76, 241264. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-9017-y
  35. Soden, B. J. and Held, I. M. 2006. An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. J. Climate 19, 33543360. doi:10.1175/JCLI3799.1
  36. Soden, B. J., Held, I. M., Colman, R., Shell, K. M., Kiehl, J. T. and co-authors. 2008. Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J. Climate 21, 35043520. doi:10.1175/2007JCLI2110.1
  37. Stevens, B., Giorgetta, M., Esch, M., Mauritsen, T., Crueger, T. and co-authors. 2013. The atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 5, 146172. doi:10.1002/jame.20015
  38. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. and Meehl, G. A. 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 93, 485498. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
  39. Taylor, P. C., Ellingson, R. G. and Cai, M. 2011. Geographical distribution of climate feedbacks in the NCAR CCSM3.0. J. Climate 24, 27372753. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3788.1
  40. Taylor, P. C., Cai, M., Hu, A., Meehl, J., Washington, W. and co-authors. 2013. A decomposition of feedback contributions to polar warming amplification. J. Climate 26, 70237043. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00696.1
  41. Tomassini, L., Geoffroy, O., Dufresne, J. L., Idelkadi, A., Cagnazzo, C. and co-authors. 2013. The respective roles of surface temperature driven feedbacks and tropospheric adjustment to CO2 in CMIP5 transient climate simulations. Clim. Dyn. 41, 31033126. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1682-3
  42. Vavrus, S. 2004. The impact of cloud feedbacks on arctic climate under greenhouse forcing. J. Climate 17, 603615. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<;0603:TIOCFO>2.0.CO;2
  43. Vial, J., Dufresne, J.-L. and Bony, S. 2013. On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates. Clim. Dyn. 41, 33393362. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9
  44. Volodin, E. M., Dianskii, N. A. and Gusev, A. V. 2010. Simulating present-day climate with the inmcm4.0 coupled model of the atmospheric and oceanic general circulations. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 46, 414431. doi:10.1134/S000143381004002X
  45. von Salzen, K., Scinocca, J. F., McFarlane, N. A., Li, J., Cole, J. N. S. and co-authors. 2013. The Canadian fourth generation atmospheric global climate model (canam4). part i: Representation of physical processes. Atmosphere-Ocean 51, 104125. doi:10.1080/07055900.2012.755610
  46. Watanabe, M., Suzuki, T., O’ishi, R., Komuro, Y., Watanabe, S. and co-authors. 2010. Improved climate simulation by miroc5. mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J. Climate 23, 63126335. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1
  47. Wendisch, M., Brückner, M., Burrows, J., Crewell, S., Dethloff, K. and co-authors. 2017. Understanding causes and effects of rapid warming in the arctic. Eos 98,
  48. Wendisch, M., Macke, A., Ehrlich, A., Lüpkes, C., Mech, M. and co-authors. 2018. The Arctic cloud puzzle: Using ACLOUD/PASCAL multi-platform observations to unravel the role of clouds and aerosol particles in Arctic amplification. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 100, 841871.
  49. Wetherald, R. T. and Manabe, S. 1988. Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 13971415. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<;1397:CFPIAG>2.0.CO;2
  50. Winton, M. 2006. Amplified arctic climate change: What does surface albedo feedback have to do with it? Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, 701.
  51. Xin, X., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Wu, T. and Fang, Y. 2013. Climate change projections over east Asia with bcc_csm1.1 climate model under RCP scenarios. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 91, 413429. doi:10.2151/jmsj.2013-401
  52. Yukimoto, S., Adachi, Y., Hosaka, M., Sakami, T., Yoshimura, H. and co-authors. 2012. A new global climate model of the meteorological research institute: Mri-cgcm3-model description and basic performance. J. Meteorol Soc JAPAN 90A, 2364. doi:10.2151/jmsj.2012-A02
Language: English
Page range: 1696139 - 1696139
Published on: Jan 1, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Karoline Block, Florian A. Schneider, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Marc Salzmann, Johannes Quaas, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.