Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How well can an ensemble predict the uncertainty in the location of winter storm precipitation? Cover

How well can an ensemble predict the uncertainty in the location of winter storm precipitation?

By:  and    
Open Access
|Jan 2018

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

An example of a slightly misplaced forecast precipitation field.

Notes: The forecast field (left) is the 24-h forecast of the 1-h accumulated precipitation starting at 0000 UTC 1 June 2005 and the verifying analysis field (right) is the 1-h accumulated Stage II precipitation analysis. In the left panel, the grey shades indicate the contours of the verifying precipitation field.

Fig. 2.

Illustration of the effect of the normalization factor K′/(K′ + 1) on the ratio of the estimates of the right- and left-hand sides of Equation (20).

Notes: The values shown are based on randomly generated samples of 10, 000 realizations of r, ra, rfk,k=1,,K, assuming a Gaussian random distribution with mean r¯=0. Because of the sampling fluctuations, the simulation is repeated 10 times for each value of K′ and the results are shown by scatter-plots.

Fig. 3.

The dependence of the prediction σloc and the estimate δloc on Σloc for a finite size search region.

Notes: The values shown are based on a randomly generated sample of 1000 realizations of r, ra, rfk,k=1,,100, assuming a truncated Gaussian random distribution with mean r¯=0 in a one-dimensional search domain of size 2d. The values of Σloc on the x-axis are shown using the search radius d as unit, while the values of σloc and δloc on the y-axis are normalized by Σloc.

Fig. 4.

Evolution of the average of K′ over all forecast cases for different values of a in the range from 0.6 to 0.9.

Fig. 5.

Evolution of the percentage M′/M of the forecast cases for which K′ ≥ 2 for different values of a in the range from 0.6 to 0.9.

Fig. 6.

Top: the values of dV¯ for the individual ensemble forecasts (dark blue dots) and the evolution of the estimate of the meridional component of the location bias Ebloc with the forecast lead time, bottom: the values of dU¯ for the individual ensemble forecasts (dark blue dots) and the evolution of the estimate of the zonal component of the location bias Ebloc.

Fig. 7.

The evolution of σloc (solid black), δloc (solid blue) and bias-corrected δloc (dashed blue) with the forecast lead time.

Fig. 8.

Top: the values of μa-μf¯ for the individual ensemble forecasts (dark blue dots) and the evolution of the estimate of the amplitude bias Ebamp with the forecast lead time, bottom: the evolution of σamp (solid black), δamp (solid blue) and bias-corrected δamp (dashed blue) with the forecast lead time.

Language: English
Page range: 1440870 - 1440870
Submitted on: Oct 3, 2017
Accepted on: Feb 11, 2018
Published on: Jan 1, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Fan Han, Istvan Szunyogh, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.