How well can an ensemble predict the uncertainty in the location of winter storm precipitation?

Fan Han; Istvan Szunyogh

doi:10.1080/16000870.2018.1440870

How well can an ensemble predict the uncertainty in the location of winter storm precipitation?

Tellus

Volume 70 (2018): Issue 1

By: Fan Han and Istvan Szunyogh

Open Access

|Jan 2018

Abstract

A pair of morphing-based ensemble forecast diagnostics is proposed for the verification of the location of precipitation events. The diagnostics are applied to operational global ensemble forecasts of winter storms in the United States in the winters of 2014/2015 and 2015/2016. A slowly developing systematic error is found to lead to an unrealistically fast eastward propagation of the storms in the week-two forecasts. Apart from this systematic error, the forecasts predict the uncertainty in the location of the precipitation events reliably. They, however, also grossly underestimate the uncertainty of the amount of precipitation in the short (shorter than 5 days) forecast range.

References

Bengtsson, L. and Körnich, H. 2016. Impact of a stochastic parametrization of cumulus convection, using cellular automata, in a mesoscale ensemble prediction system. Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 142(695), 1150–1159.10.1002/qj.2016.142.issue-695
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buizza, R. 1997. Potential forecast skill of ensemble prediction and spread and skill distribution of the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Mon. Wea. Rev. 125, 99–119.10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<;0099:PFSOEP>2.0.CO;2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Greybush, S. J., Saslo, S. and Grumm, R. 2017. Assessing the ensemble predictability of precipitation forecasts for the January 2015 and 2016 east coast winter storms. Wea. Forecasting 32(3), 1057–1078.10.1175/WAF-D-16-0153.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Han, F. and Szunyogh, I. 2016. A morphing-based technique for the verification of precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev. 144, 295–313.10.1175/MWR-D-15-0172.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Han, F. and Szunyogh, I. 2017. A technique for the verification of precipitation forecasts and its application to a problem of predictability. Submitted to Mon. Wea. Rev. Preprint Online at: https://sites.google.com/a/tamu.edu/hanfan/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Herrera, M. A., Szunyogh, I. and Tribbia, J. 2016. Forecast uncertainty dynamics in the Thorpex Interactive Grand Global Ensemble (TIGGE). Mon. Wea. Rev. 144(7), 2739–2766.10.1175/MWR-D-15-0293.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keil, C. and Craig, G. C. 2007. A displacement-based error measure applied in a regional ensemble forecasting system. Mon. Wea. Rev. 135, 3248–3259.10.1175/MWR3457.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keil, C. and Craig, G. C. 2009. A displacement and amplitude score employing an optical flow technique. Wea. Forecasting 24, 1297–1308.10.1175/2009WAF2222247.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Khouider, B., Biello, J., Majda, A. J., et al. 2010. A stochastic multicloud model for tropical convection. Commun. Math. Sci. 8(1), 187–216.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lin, Y. and Mitchell K. E. 2005. The NCEP Stage II/IV hourly precipitation analyses: development and applications. In: 19th Conference of Hydrology, American Meteorological Society.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Loeser, C. F., Herrera, M. A. and Szunyogh, I. 2017. An assessment of the performance of the operational global ensemble forecast systems in predicting the forecast uncertainty. Wea. Forecasting 32(1), 149–164.10.1175/WAF-D-16-0126.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Palmer, T., Buizza, R., Doblas-Reyes, F., Jung, T., Leutbecher, M., and co-authors 2009. Stochastic parametrization and model uncertainty. ECMWF Tech. Memo 598, 1–42.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Talagrand, O., Vautard R. and Strauss B. 1999. Evaluation of probabilistic prediction systems. In: Proceedings of the ECMWF Workshop on Predictability, European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading, Berkshire, UK, 1–25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, Z. and Bovik, A. C. 2002. A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 9(3), 81–84. DOI:10.1109/97.995823.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, Z. and Bovik, A. C. 2009. Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 26, 98–117.10.1109/MSP.2008.930649
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R. and Simoncelli, E. P. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13, 600–612.10.1109/TIP.2003.819861
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wernli, H., Paulat, M., Hagen, M. and Frei, C. 2008. SAL – a novel quality measure for the verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev. 136, 4470–4487.10.1175/2008MWR2415.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article