Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Towards inclusive schooling policies in Finland: a multiple-case study from policy to practice Cover

Towards inclusive schooling policies in Finland: a multiple-case study from policy to practice

By:   
Open Access
|May 2017

References

  1. Ainscow, M., T. Booth, and A. Dyson. 2006. Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. London: Routledge.
  2. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  3. Avramidis, E., and B. Norwich. 2002. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Integration/Inclusion: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17 (2): 129147. doi: 10.1080/08856250210129056
  4. Basic Education Act (642/2010). Accessed May 4, 2014. http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf
  5. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Brunila, K. 2012. “From Risk to Resilience: The Therapeutic Ethos is Youth Education.Education Inquiry 3 (3): 451464. doi: 10.3402/edui.v3i3.22046
  7. Bussing, R., F. A. Gary, C. E. Leon, C. W. Garvan, and R. Reid. 2002. “General Classroom Teachers’ Information and Perceptions of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.” Behavioral Disorders 27 (4): 327339.
  8. Conrad, P., and J. Schneider. 1992. Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  9. Dockrell, J. E., B. M. Shield, and K. Rigby. 2003. “Acoustic Guidelines and Teacher Strategies for Optimising Learning Conditions in Classrooms for Children with Hearing Problems.” In Access: Achieving Clear Communication Employing Sound Solutions, edited by D. Fabry and C. DeConde Johnson, 217229. Chicago, IL: Phonak.
  10. Dyson, A., A. Howes, and B. Roberts. 2002. “A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of School Level Action for Promoting Participation by All Students (EPPI-Centre Review, Version 1.1*).” In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Rapport&cid=1253986430399&lang=no&pagename=kunnskapssenter%2FHovedsidemal
  11. Finn, J. D., G. M. Pannozzo, and C. M. Achilles. 2003. “The ‘Why’s’ of Class Size: Student Behaviour in Small Classes.” Review of Educational Research 73 (3): 321368. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516038 doi: 10.3102/00346543073003321
  12. Finnish National Board of Education. 2011. Equal Education. Accessed May 4, 2014. http://www.oph.fi/english/education
  13. Graham, L. J., and M. Jahnukainen. 2011. “Wherefore Art Thou, Inclusion? Analysing the Development of Inclusive Education in New South Wales, Alberta and Finland.” Journal of Education Policy 26 (2): 263288. doi:10.1080/02680939.2010.493230
  14. Haug, P. 2010. “Approaches to Empirical Research on Inclusive Education.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 12 (3): 199209. doi:10.1080/15017410903385052
  15. Juusenaho, R. 2004. Peruskoulun Rehtoreiden Johtamisen Eroja Sukupuolien Näkökulma. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House.
  16. Kivirauma, J. 1999. “Oppivelvollisuuskoulun vammaispolitiikka.” In Pyörätuolitango. Näkökulmia vammaisuuteen, edited by S. Nouko-Juvonen, 4976. Helsinki: Edita.
  17. Kivirauma, J., K. Klemelä, and R. Rinne. 2006. “Segregation, Integration, Inclusion – The Ideology and Reality in Finland.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 21 (2): 117133. doi: 10.1080/08856250600600729
  18. Klonsky, M. 2002. “How Smaller Schools Prevent School Violence.” Educational Leadership 59 (5): 6065. http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.utu.fi:2048/ehost/detail?vid=32&sid=bec30a7a-db09-4959-84928ed4c176f2f0%40sessionmgr115&hid=115&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=trh&AN=6503385
  19. Koay, T. L., L. Lim, W. K. Sim, and J. Elkins. 2006. “Learning Assistance and Regular Teacher’s Perceptions of Inclusive Education in Brunei Darussalam.” International Journal of Special Education 21 (1): 131143.
  20. Kuorelahti, M., and T. Vehkakoski. 2009. Tukitoimet kunnossa perusopetuksessa? Erityisopetuksen toimivuus ja kouluviihtyvyys oppilaiden, vanhempien ja koulun opetushenkilöstön arvioimana. Kuopio: Snellman- instituutti.
  21. Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  22. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  23. Mietola, R. 2014. Hankala erityisyys. Etnografinen tutkimus erityisopetuksen käytännöistä ja erityisyyden muotoutumisesta yläkoulun arjessa [Troubling Special. An Ethnographic Study on Practices of Special Education and Formation of Special in the Everyday Life of Lower Secondary School]. Helsingin yliopisto, Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos. Kasvatustieteellisiä tutkimuksia 255.
  24. Ministry of Education. 2007. Special Education Strategy. Reports of the Ministry of Education, Finland. Accessed May 4, 2014. http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Julkaisut/2007/Erityisopetuksen_strategia.html?lang=fi&extra_locale=en
  25. Nye, B., L. V. Hedges, and S. Konstantopoulos. 2000. “The Effects of Small Classes on Academic Achievement: The Results of the Tennessee Class Size Experiment.” American Educational Research Journal 37 (1): 123151. doi:10.3102/00028312037001123
  26. Pihlaja, P. 2009. “Erityisen tuen käytännöt varhaiskasvatuksessa – näkökulmana inkluusio.” Kasvatus 49 (2): 146157.
  27. Sapon-Shevin, M. 2007. Widening the Circle: The Power of the Inclusive Classroom. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  28. Stasz, C., and B. M. Stecher. 2000. “Teaching Mathematics and Language Arts in Reduced Size and Non-reduced Size Classrooms.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22 (4): 313329. doi: 10.3102/01623737022004313
  29. Teittinen, A. 2008. “Normaliteetin rajat ja rakenteet [The Borders and Structures of Normality].” In Muuttuvat marginaalit: näkökulmia vammaistutkimukseen [Changing Margins: The Disability Research Perspective], edited by J. Kivirauma, 126148. Kehitysvammaliiton tutkimuksia 1/2008.
  30. Teittinen, A. 2011. “Onko diagnoosi tarpeellinen? Pohdintoja lääketieteellisten diagnoosien yhteiskunnallisista merkityksistä.” In Alkoholin vaurioittamat: raskaudenaikaisen alkoholinkäytön vaikutukset lapsen elämään, edited by S. Vaarla, 164181. Helsinki: Kehitysvammaliitto.
  31. Tomlinson, S. 2012. “The Irresistible Rise of the SEN Industry.Oxford Review of Education 38 (3): 267286. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2012.692055
  32. UNESCO. 1994. The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paris: UNESCO.
  33. Vehkakoski, T. 2006. “Ominaisuuksista oireyhtymiksi. Neuropsykiatriset diagnoosit ja neurotieteelliset selitysmallit vammaisuuden tuottajina.” In Vammaisuuden tutkimus, edited by A. Teittinen, 237264. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
  34. Warnock Report. 1978. Special Educational Needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People. London: HMSO.
  35. Wheeler, J. 1993. Kansas Class Size/Caseload Study. KS: Northeast Kansas Education Service Center. Accessed May 4, 2014. http://nekesc.org/kids/CSCL/summary.html
Language: English
Page range: 194 - 205
Submitted on: Mar 18, 2013
Accepted on: Apr 21, 2016
Published on: May 3, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2017 Sonia Lempinen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.