Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Staging co-design processes for self-care technologies Cover

Staging co-design processes for self-care technologies

Open Access
|Jan 2016

References

  1. Akrich, M. 1992. “The Description of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W. E. Bijker, and J. Law, 205224. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  2. Archer, B. 1965. Systematic Method for Designers. London: COID.
  3. Archer, B. 1969. “The Structure of the Design Process.” In Design Methods in Architecture, edited by G. Broadbent, and A. Ward, 76102. London: Lund Humphries.
  4. Barnes, C. 1996. “Disability and the Myth of the Independent Researcher.” Disability and Society 11 (1): 107112. doi: 10.1080/09687599650023362
  5. Brandt, E., M. Johansson, and J. Messeter. 2005. “Design Lab – Re-thinking What and How to Design.” In Design Spaces, edited by T. Binder, and M. Hellström, 34–43. Finland: IT-Press.
  6. Bratteteig, T., and J. Gregory. 2001. “Understanding Design.” The Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Ulvik, Norway: IRIS 24.
  7. Brodersen, S., M. Hansen, and H. Lindegaard. 2015. “Script of Healthcare Technology – Do Design of Robotic Beds Exclude or Include the Users?Design Issues 31 (2), 1628. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00319
  8. Brodersen, S., and H. Lindegaard. 2013. “Ability or Disability – Design for Whom?Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. doi:10.1080/15017419.2013.803499.
  9. Bury, M. 2000. “On Chronic Illness and Disability.” In Handbook of Medical Sociology. 5th ed. edited by C. E. Bird, P. Conrad, and A. M. Fremont, 173–183. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  10. Clausen, C., and Y. Yoshinaka. 2007. “Staging Sociotechnical Spaces: Translating Across Boundaries in Design.” Journal of Design Research 6 (1–2), 61–78.
  11. Cowan, R. 1987. “The Consumption Junction: A Proposal for Research Strategies in Sociology or Technology.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 254–272. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Cross, N. 1980. The Recent History of Post-Industrial Design Methods. London: The Design Council.
  13. Cross, N., ed. 1984. Developments in Design Methodology. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  14. Easton, K. 1993. “Defining the Concept of Self-Care.” Rehabilitation Nursing 18 (8), 384–387.
  15. Finkelstein, V. 2001a. A Personal Journey into Disability Politics. The Disability Studies Archive UK, Centre for Disability Studies: University of Leeds. http://www.independentliving.org/docs3/finkelstein01a.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2015.
  16. Finkelstein, V. 2001b. The Social Model Repossessed. The Disability Studies Archive UK, Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds. http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/finkelstein-soc-mod-repossessed.pdf.
  17. George, J. B. 1980. Nursing Theories. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  18. Ghislaine, M. L. 2001. “Hospital Beds by Design: A Socio-Historical Account of the ‘King's Fund Bed’, 1960–1975.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.
  19. Hanlon, G., T. Strangleman, J. Goode, D. Luff, A. O'Cathain, and D. Greatbatch. 2005. “Knowledge, Technology and Nursing: The Case of NHS Direct.” Human Relations 58 (2): 147171. doi: 10.1177/0018726705052179
  20. Høst, M., and Jensen, L. 2012, Spring. Badelift til kørestolsbrugere. Bachelorproject, Technical University of Denmark.
  21. Law, J. 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
  22. Lie, M., and Sørensen, K. H. 1996. Making Technology our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
  23. Mort, M., C. May, and T. Williams. 2003. “Remote Doctors and Absent Patients: Acting at a Distance in Telemedicine?Science, Technology and Human Values 28 (2): 274295. doi: 10.1177/0162243902250907
  24. Moser, I. 2006. “On Becoming Disabled and Articulating Alternatives.” Cultural Studies 19 (6): 667700. doi: 10.1080/09502380500365648
  25. Namioka, A., and Schuler, D. 1990. “Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.” PDC ‘90: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Palo Alto.
  26. Oliver, M. 1990. “The Individual and Social Models of Disability.” Paper presented at the Joint Workshop of the Living Options Group and the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians on People with Established Locomotor Disabilities in Hospitals, July 23.
  27. Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production.” Disability, Handicap, and Society 7 (2): 101114. doi: 10.1080/02674649266780141
  28. Oliver, M. 1997. “Emancipatory Research: Realistic Goal or Impossible Dream?” In Doing Disability Research, edited by C. Barnes, and G. Mercer, 15–31. Leeds: The Disability Press.
  29. Oliver, M. 2004. “If I had a Hammer: The Social Model in Action.” In The Social Model of Disability – Theory and Research, edited by C. Barnes, 7–12. Leeds: The Disability Press.
  30. Orem, D. (1991). Nursing Concepts and Practices. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.
  31. Oudshoorn, N., M. Brouns, and E. van Oost. 2005. “Diversity and Distributed Agency in the Design and Use of Medical Video-Communication Technologies.” In Inside the Politics of Technology, edited by H. Harbers, 85–105. Amsterdam: University Press.
  32. Regeringen, K., and Regioner, D. 2013, September. Digital Velfærd: En Lettere Hverdag – Fællesoffentlig Strategi for Digital Velfærd 2013–2020.
  33. Rose, D. 2001. “Reconceptualizing the User(s) of – and in – Technological Innovation: The Case of Vaccines in the United States.” In Technology and the Market: Demand, Users and Innovation, edited by R. Coombs, K. Green, A. Rich-ards, and W. Walsh, 68–89. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  34. Sanders, E., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-creations and the New Landscapes of Design.” Co-Design 4 (1): 518.
  35. Silverstone, R., D. Morley, A. Dahlberg, and S. M. Livingstone. 1989. “Families, Technologies, and Consumption: The Household and Information and Communication Technologies.” CRICT discussions paper, Brunel University.
  36. Sørensen, R. 2013. “Velfærdsteknologi – Status og strategi.” Paper presented at Boligkonferencen 2013 Tilgængelighed og implementering af velfærdsteknologi 27. August 2013, Hotel Scandic, Vejle. Socialstyrelsen.
  37. Star, S. L. 1991. “Power, Technologies and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions.” In A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Sociological Review Monograph 38, edited by J. Law, 26–57. London: Taylor & Francis.
  38. Steen, M., Kuijt-Evers, L. and Klok, J. 2007. “Early User Involvement in Research and Design Projects – A Review of Methods and Practices.” Paper from 23rd EGOS (European Group for Organizational Studies) Colloquium, Vienna.
  39. Thomas, C. 2004. “How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches.” Disability and Society 19 (6): 569583. doi: 10.1080/0968759042000252506
  40. Williams, S. 1999. “Is Anybody There? Critical Realism, Chronic Illness and the Disability Debate.” Sociology of Health and Illness 21 (6): 797819. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00184
Language: English
Page range: 354 - 368
Submitted on: Jun 4, 2015
Accepted on: Nov 30, 2015
Published on: Jan 4, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Søsser Brodersen, Hanne Lindegaard, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.