Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
User councils for disabled people in Norway – from reactive to proactive? Cover

User councils for disabled people in Norway – from reactive to proactive?

By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2016

References

  1. Alm Andreassen, T. 1991. “Kommunale råd for funksjonshemmede som arena for brukermedvirkning” [Councils for Disabled People in the Municipalities as Arena for User Involvement] Forprosjektrapport, Prosjektrapport 89. Oslo: Norges byggforskningsinstitutt.
  2. Alm Andreassen, T. 2004. “Brukermedvirkning, politikk og velferdsstat” [User Involvement, Politics and Welfare State]. Dr.polit-avhandling avgitt ved Institutt for sosiologi og samfunnsgeografi, Universitetet i Oslo. Arbeidsforskningsinstituttets skriftserie 13. Oslo: Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet.
  3. Alm Andreassen, T. 2006. “Truet frivillighet og forvitrede folkebevegelser? En diskusjon av hva perspektiver fra studier av sosiale bevegelser kan tilføre forskningen om frivillige organisasjoner” [Threatened voluntary sector and disintegrated movements? A discussion about contributions from theories of social movements to studies of civic associations].” Sosiologisk tidsskrift 14: 146170.
  4. Alm Andreassen, T. 2009. Brukermedvirkning i NAV. Når velferdsforvaltningen og brukerorganisasjonene skal jobbe sammen [User involvement in the welfare administration. When the welfare administration and the user organizations are working together]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
  5. Andersen, J. 2011. “Brukerrepresentasjon i råd og utvalg på lokalt og regionalt nivå” [User representation in councils at local and regional level] Research report no. 146/2011. Lillehammer: Lillehammer University College.
  6. Barnes, M. 1999. “Users as Citizens: Collective Action and the Local Governance of Welfare.” Social Policy and Administration 33 (1): 7390. doi: 10.1111/1467-9515.00132
  7. Barnes, M., and P. Cotterell. 2012. “Introduction: From Margin to Mainstream.” In Critical Perspectives on User Involvement, edited by M. Barnes and P. Cotterell, xvxxvi. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  8. Barnes, M., A. Knops, J. Newman, and H. Sullivan. 2004. “The Micro-Politics of Deliberation: Case Studies in Public Participation.” Contemporary Politics 10 (2): 93110. doi: 10.1080/1356977042000278756
  9. Beresford, P. 2012. “The Theory and Philosophy Behind User Involvement.” In Social Care, Service Users and User Involvement, edited by P. Beresford and S. Carr, 2136. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  10. Beresford, P., and F. Branfield. 2012. “Building Solidarity, Ensuring Diversity: Lessons from Service Users’ and Disabled People's Movements.” In Critical Perspectives on User Involvement, edited by M. Barnes and P. Cotterell, 3345. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  11. Beresford, P., and J. Campbell. 1994. “Disabled People, Service Users, User Involvement and Representation.” Disability and Society 9 (3): 315325. doi: 10.1080/09687599466780361
  12. Braye, S. 2000. “Participation and Involvement in Social Care. An Overview.” In User Involvement and Participation in Social Care: Research Informing Practice, edited by H. Kemshall and R. Littlechild, 928. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  13. Carr, S. 2012. “Participation, Resistance and Change: Examining Influences on the Impact of Service User Participation.” In Social Care, Service Users and User Involvement, edited by P. Beresford and S. Carr, 3751. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  14. Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, P. G. Roness, and K. A. Røvik. 2007. Organization Theory and the Public Sector. Instrument, Culture and Myth. London: Taylor & Francis.
  15. Cowden, S., and G. Singh. 2007. “The ‘User’: Friend, Foe or Fetish?: A Critical Exploration of User Involvement in Health and Social Care.” Critical Social Policy 27 (1): 523. doi: 10.1177/0261018307072205
  16. Crant, J. M. 2000. “Proactive Behavior in Organizations.” Journal of Management 26 (3): 435462. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600304
  17. Hultqvist, S. and T. Salonen. 2011. “Brukardelaktighet i välfärdsstaten – retorik och praktik” [User involvement in the welfare state – rhetoric and practice]. In Social mobilisering – en utmaning för socialt arbete, edited by V. Denvall, C. Heule och, A. Kristiansen, Chap. 4. Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning.
  18. Kvale, S. 2001. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [The qualitative research interview]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
  19. Martin, S., and A. Boaz. 2000. “Public Participation and Citizen-Centred Local Government: Lessons from the Best Value and Better Government for Older People Pilot Programmes.” Public Money & Management 20 (2): 4753. doi: 10.1111/1467-9302.00211
  20. Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. London: MacMillan Press.
  21. Selznick, P. 1984/1949. TVA and the Grass Roots. A Study of Politics and Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press. Originally published in 1949.
  22. Simmons, R., and J. Birchall. 2005. “A Joined-up Approach to User Participation in Public Services: Strengthening the ‘Participation Chain’.” Social Policy & Administration 39 (3): 260283. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00439.x
  23. St. meld. nr. 34. 1996–1997. Resultater og erfaringer fra regjeringens handlingsplaner for funksjonshemmede og veien videre [Results and experiences from the governments’ working plans for disabled people and the way ahead]. Oslo: Arbeids- og sosialdepartementet.
  24. Wistow, G., and M. Barnes. 1993. “User Involvement in Community Care: Origins, Purposes and Applications.” Public Administration 71: 279299. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1993.tb00975.x
Language: English
Page range: 284 - 294
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2015
Accepted on: May 21, 2015
Published on: Jul 4, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Jan Andersen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.