Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The ideal victims? Women with intellectual disability as victims of prostitution-related crime Cover

The ideal victims? Women with intellectual disability as victims of prostitution-related crime

Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Bengtsson, E. 2010. “Trovärdighetsbedömningen av muntliga utsagor i brottmålsprocessen [Credibility Assessment of Oral Statements in Criminal Cases].” Master's thesis, Örebro universitet.
  2. Brunovskis, A., and R. Surtees. 2007. Leaving the Past Behind? When Victims of Trafficking Decline Assistance. Fafo Report 2007:40. Oslo: Fafo.
  3. Bull, R. 2010. “The Investigative Interviewing of Children and Other Vulnerable Witnesses: Psychological Research and Working/Professional Practice.” Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15 (1): 523. doi:10.1348/014466509X440160.
  4. Cardone, D., and H. Dent. 1996. “Memory and Interrogative Suggestibility: The Effects of Modality of Information Presentation and Retrieval Conditions Upon the Suggestibility Scores of People With Learning Disabilities.” Legal and Criminological Psychology 1 (2): 165177. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00316.x.
  5. Cederborg, A., and M. Lamb. 2008. “Interviewing Alleged Victims with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 52 (1): 4958. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00976.x.
  6. Christie, N. 1986. “The Ideal Victim.” In From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System, edited by E. A. Fattah, 1730. London: Macmillan.
  7. Fagerström, P. 2009. “Handikappad kvinna tvingad sälja sex [Handicapped Woman Forced to Sell Sex].” Mitt i Huddinge, October 13.
  8. Finndahl, K. 2005. Synliggör det osynliga! Ett projekt om våld – funktionshinder – könsperspektiv [Make the Invisible Visble! A Project About Violence, Disability and Gender Perspective]. Sundbyberg: Handikappförbundens samarbetsorgan (HSO).
  9. Gudjonsson, G., and T. Joyce. 2011. “Interviewing Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.” Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 5 (2): 1621. doi:10.5042/amhid.2011.0108.
  10. Hollomotz, A. 2009. “Beyond ‘Vulnerability’: An Ecological Model Approach to Conceptualizing Risk of Sexual Violence against People with Learning Difficulties.” British Journal of Social Work, 39 (1): 99112. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm091.
  11. Hollomotz, A. 2011. Learning Difficulties and Sexual Vulnerability. A Social Approach. London. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  12. Kebbell, M. R., and D. C. Giles. 2000. “Some Experimental Influences of Lawyers' Complicated Questions on Eyewitness Confidence and Accuracy.” The Journal of Psychology, 134 (2): 129139. doi:10.1080/00223980009600855.
  13. Kebbell, M. R., and C. Hatton. 1999. “People with Mental Retardation as Witnesses in Court: A Review.” Mental Retardation 37 (3): 179187. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(1999)037<;0179:PWMRAW>2.0.CO;2.
  14. Kebbell, M. R., C. Hatton, and S. D. Johnson. 2004. “Witnesses with Intellectual Disabilities in Court: What Questions Are Asked and What Influence Do They Have?Legal and Criminological Psychology 9 (1): 2335. doi:10.1348/135532504322776834.
  15. Kebbell, M. R., C. Hatton, S. D. Johnson, and C. M. E. O'Kelly. 2001. “People with Learning Disabilities as Witnesses in Court: What Questions Should Lawyers Ask?British Journal of Learning Disabilities 29 (3): 98102. doi:10.1046/j.1354-4187.2001.00138.x.
  16. Kvale, S. 1997. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [The Qualitative Research Interview]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  17. Kvarfordt, C. L., P. Purcell, and P. Shannon. 2005. “Youth with Learning Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice System: A Training Needs Assessment of Detention and Court Services Personnel.” Child and Youth Care Forum 34 (1): 2742. doi:10.1007/s10566-004-0880-x.
  18. Keilty, J., and G. Connelly. 2001. “Making a Statement: An Exploratory Study of Barriers Facing Women with an Intellectual Disability when Making a Statement about Sexual Assault to Police.” Disability and Society 16 (2): 273291. doi:10.1080/09687590120035843.
  19. Kuosmanen, J., and M. Starke. 2011. “Women and Men with Intellectual Disabilities Who Sell or Trade Sex: Voices from the Professionals.” Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation 10 (3): 129149. doi:10.1080/1536710X.2011.596424
  20. Kuosmanen, J., and M. Starke. 2013. “Identifying the Invisible: The Experiences of Prostitution among Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: Implications for Social Work.” Journal of Social Work 13 (2): 123140. http//jsw.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/05/27/1468017311409632.
  21. Lewin, B. 2002. Vem bryr sig? Om synlighet och rättsäkerhet för brottsoffer med funktionshinder [Who Cares? About Transparency and Legal Security for Victims with Disabilities]. Umeå: The Swedish Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority.
  22. Magnusson, M. 2010. “Fem av tio frias i kopplerihärvan [Five out of Ten Was Acquited in Procuring Case].” Svenska Dagbladet, November 3.
  23. McCarthy, M. 2000. “Consent, Abuse and Choices: Women with Intellectual Disabilities and Sexuality.” In Women with Intellectual Disabilities: Finding a Place in the World, edited by R. Traustadottir and K. Johnson, 132159. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  24. Nilsson, P. 2008. “Man åtalas för att ha tvingat sin fru till prostitution [The Man Prosecuted for Forcing His Wife into Prostitution].” Dagens Nyheter, May 17.
  25. Perry, N. W., B. D. McAuliff, P. Tam, L. Claycomb, C. Dostal, and C. Flanagan. 1995. “When Lawyers Question Children: Is Justice Served?Law and Human Behavior 19 (6): 609629. doi:10.1007/BF01499377.
  26. Petersilia, J. R. 2001. “Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: A Review Essay.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 28 (6): 655694. doi:10.1177/00938548010280601.
  27. Rubin, G. 1984. “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics and Sexuality.” In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, edited by C. S. Vance, 143178. London: Pandora.
  28. Sanders, A., J. Creaton, S. Bird, and L. Weber. 1997. Victims with Learning Disabilities: Negotiating the Criminal Justice System. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Criminological Research.
  29. Swedish National Police Board. 2010. Människohandel för sexuella och andra ändamål 2009: Lägesrapport 11 [Human Trafficking for Sexual and Other Purposes 2009: Status Report 11]. Swedish National Police Board Report No. 2010:5. Stockholm: Swedish National Police Board.
  30. Swedish National Police Board. 2011. Människohandel för sexuella och andra ändamål 2010: Lägesrapport 12 [Human Trafficking for Sexual and Other Purposes 2010: Status Report 12]. Swedish National Police Board Report No. 2011. Stockholm: Swedish National Police Board.
  31. The National Board of Health and Welfare. 2008. Prostitution in Sweden 2007. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare.
  32. Valenti-Hein, D. C., and L. D. Schwartz. 1993. “Witness Competency in People with Mental Retardation: Implications for Prosecution of Sexual Abuse.” Sexuality and Disability 11 (4): 287294. doi:10.1007/BF01102173.
  33. Younes, H., and J. Bävman. 2010. “Efter kopplerihärvan, ‘Man blir matt. Det är för jäkligt’ [After Procuring Case, ‘You Become Dull. It's too Rotten’].” Sydsvenskan, May 7.
Language: English
Page range: 62 - 75
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2013
Accepted on: Jun 4, 2013
Published on: Jul 1, 2015
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2015 Jari Kuosmanen, Mikaela Starke, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.