The ideal victims? Women with intellectual disability as victims of prostitution-related crime

Jari Kuosmanen; Mikaela Starke

doi:10.1080/15017419.2013.813409

The ideal victims? Women with intellectual disability as victims of prostitution-related crime

Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

Volume 17 (2015): Issue 1

By: Jari Kuosmanen and Mikaela Starke

Open Access

|Jul 2015

Abstract

In Sweden several recent prostitution-related offences where the victims were women with intellectual disabilities (IDs) have created problems for criminal investigators and prosecutors. Based on court documents and interviews with police, prosecutors and social workers, and drawing upon Christie's notion of the ‘ideal victim’, four legal cases were analysed. Obtaining solid witness accounts from the victims was usually difficult. Several had a personal relationship with the defendant and were initially reluctant to provide a proper witness statement. Different types of psychological, social, and cognitive support had to be arranged to facilitate the process. As the analysis shows, there is a clear need to improve the skills and methods of professionals working within the legal system to ensure that the rights of individuals with IDs are properly met within the justice system, and that the quality of the police's work with them can stand up to scrutiny.

References

Bengtsson, E. 2010. “Trovärdighetsbedömningen av muntliga utsagor i brottmålsprocessen [Credibility Assessment of Oral Statements in Criminal Cases].” Master's thesis, Örebro universitet.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brunovskis, A., and R. Surtees. 2007. Leaving the Past Behind? When Victims of Trafficking Decline Assistance. Fafo Report 2007:40. Oslo: Fafo.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bull, R. 2010. “The Investigative Interviewing of Children and Other Vulnerable Witnesses: Psychological Research and Working/Professional Practice.” Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1348/014466509X440160.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cardone, D., and H. Dent. 1996. “Memory and Interrogative Suggestibility: The Effects of Modality of Information Presentation and Retrieval Conditions Upon the Suggestibility Scores of People With Learning Disabilities.” Legal and Criminological Psychology 1 (2): 165–177. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00316.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cederborg, A., and M. Lamb. 2008. “Interviewing Alleged Victims with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 52 (1): 49–58. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00976.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christie, N. 1986. “The Ideal Victim.” In From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System, edited by E. A. Fattah, 17–30. London: Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fagerström, P. 2009. “Handikappad kvinna tvingad sälja sex [Handicapped Woman Forced to Sell Sex].” Mitt i Huddinge, October 13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Finndahl, K. 2005. Synliggör det osynliga! Ett projekt om våld – funktionshinder – könsperspektiv [Make the Invisible Visble! A Project About Violence, Disability and Gender Perspective]. Sundbyberg: Handikappförbundens samarbetsorgan (HSO).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gudjonsson, G., and T. Joyce. 2011. “Interviewing Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.” Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 5 (2): 16–21. doi:10.5042/amhid.2011.0108.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hollomotz, A. 2009. “Beyond ‘Vulnerability’: An Ecological Model Approach to Conceptualizing Risk of Sexual Violence against People with Learning Difficulties.” British Journal of Social Work, 39 (1): 99–112. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm091.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hollomotz, A. 2011. Learning Difficulties and Sexual Vulnerability. A Social Approach. London. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kebbell, M. R., and D. C. Giles. 2000. “Some Experimental Influences of Lawyers' Complicated Questions on Eyewitness Confidence and Accuracy.” The Journal of Psychology, 134 (2): 129–139. doi:10.1080/00223980009600855.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kebbell, M. R., and C. Hatton. 1999. “People with Mental Retardation as Witnesses in Court: A Review.” Mental Retardation 37 (3): 179–187. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(1999)037<;0179:PWMRAW>2.0.CO;2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kebbell, M. R., C. Hatton, and S. D. Johnson. 2004. “Witnesses with Intellectual Disabilities in Court: What Questions Are Asked and What Influence Do They Have?” Legal and Criminological Psychology 9 (1): 23–35. doi:10.1348/135532504322776834.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kebbell, M. R., C. Hatton, S. D. Johnson, and C. M. E. O'Kelly. 2001. “People with Learning Disabilities as Witnesses in Court: What Questions Should Lawyers Ask?” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 29 (3): 98–102. doi:10.1046/j.1354-4187.2001.00138.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kvale, S. 1997. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [The Qualitative Research Interview]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kvarfordt, C. L., P. Purcell, and P. Shannon. 2005. “Youth with Learning Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice System: A Training Needs Assessment of Detention and Court Services Personnel.” Child and Youth Care Forum 34 (1): 27–42. doi:10.1007/s10566-004-0880-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keilty, J., and G. Connelly. 2001. “Making a Statement: An Exploratory Study of Barriers Facing Women with an Intellectual Disability when Making a Statement about Sexual Assault to Police.” Disability and Society 16 (2): 273–291. doi:10.1080/09687590120035843.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuosmanen, J., and M. Starke. 2011. “Women and Men with Intellectual Disabilities Who Sell or Trade Sex: Voices from the Professionals.” Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation 10 (3): 129–149. doi:10.1080/1536710X.2011.596424
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuosmanen, J., and M. Starke. 2013. “Identifying the Invisible: The Experiences of Prostitution among Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: Implications for Social Work.” Journal of Social Work 13 (2): 123–140. http//jsw.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/05/27/1468017311409632.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewin, B. 2002. Vem bryr sig? Om synlighet och rättsäkerhet för brottsoffer med funktionshinder [Who Cares? About Transparency and Legal Security for Victims with Disabilities]. Umeå: The Swedish Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Magnusson, M. 2010. “Fem av tio frias i kopplerihärvan [Five out of Ten Was Acquited in Procuring Case].” Svenska Dagbladet, November 3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCarthy, M. 2000. “Consent, Abuse and Choices: Women with Intellectual Disabilities and Sexuality.” In Women with Intellectual Disabilities: Finding a Place in the World, edited by R. Traustadottir and K. Johnson, 132–159. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nilsson, P. 2008. “Man åtalas för att ha tvingat sin fru till prostitution [The Man Prosecuted for Forcing His Wife into Prostitution].” Dagens Nyheter, May 17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perry, N. W., B. D. McAuliff, P. Tam, L. Claycomb, C. Dostal, and C. Flanagan. 1995. “When Lawyers Question Children: Is Justice Served?” Law and Human Behavior 19 (6): 609–629. doi:10.1007/BF01499377.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petersilia, J. R. 2001. “Crime Victims with Developmental Disabilities: A Review Essay.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 28 (6): 655–694. doi:10.1177/00938548010280601.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rubin, G. 1984. “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics and Sexuality.” In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, edited by C. S. Vance, 143–178. London: Pandora.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sanders, A., J. Creaton, S. Bird, and L. Weber. 1997. Victims with Learning Disabilities: Negotiating the Criminal Justice System. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Criminological Research.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swedish National Police Board. 2010. Människohandel för sexuella och andra ändamål 2009: Lägesrapport 11 [Human Trafficking for Sexual and Other Purposes 2009: Status Report 11]. Swedish National Police Board Report No. 2010:5. Stockholm: Swedish National Police Board.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swedish National Police Board. 2011. Människohandel för sexuella och andra ändamål 2010: Lägesrapport 12 [Human Trafficking for Sexual and Other Purposes 2010: Status Report 12]. Swedish National Police Board Report No. 2011. Stockholm: Swedish National Police Board.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The National Board of Health and Welfare. 2008. Prostitution in Sweden 2007. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Valenti-Hein, D. C., and L. D. Schwartz. 1993. “Witness Competency in People with Mental Retardation: Implications for Prosecution of Sexual Abuse.” Sexuality and Disability 11 (4): 287–294. doi:10.1007/BF01102173.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Younes, H., and J. Bävman. 2010. “Efter kopplerihärvan, ‘Man blir matt. Det är för jäkligt’ [After Procuring Case, ‘You Become Dull. It's too Rotten’].” Sydsvenskan, May 7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article