
Quality assurance of decision-making in conversations between professionals and non-professionals: identifying the presence of deliberative principles
By: Anne Dorthe Tveit and Liv Tveit Walseth
Abstract
The ideal of dialogue is at stake in professional conversations. The aim of this study is to develop an instrument that makes it possible to compare principles of deliberation with what actually takes place in professional conversations. The developed instrument is tested on one patient's conversation with his doctor about lifestyle changes, and meetings where pupils with learning disabilities and their parents discuss further schooling with school representatives. Although in need of refinement, the conclusion is that the instrument provides meaningful insight into how much each participant contributes to the decision-making process and behaves during the conversation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2011.574832 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 232 - 253
Submitted on: Mar 9, 2010
Accepted on: Nov 25, 2010
Published on: Aug 3, 2012
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2012 Anne Dorthe Tveit, Liv Tveit Walseth, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.