Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality of cost evaluations of physician continuous professional development: Systematic review of reporting and methods Cover

Quality of cost evaluations of physician continuous professional development: Systematic review of reporting and methods

Open Access
|Mar 2022

References

  1. Maloney S Cook DA Golub R AMEE guide no. 123—how to read studies of educational costs Med Teach 2019 41 497 504 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1552784
  2. Walsh K Cost-effectiveness in medical education 2010 Abingdon Radcliffe Publishing
  3. Brown CA Belfield CR Field SJ Cost effectiveness of continuing professional development in health care: a critical review of the evidence BMJ 2002 324 652 655 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.652
  4. Maloney S Reeves S Rivers G The Prato statement on cost and value in professional and interprofessional education J Interprof Care 2017 31 1 1 4 10.1080/13561820.2016.1257255
  5. Cook DA Beckman TJ High-value, cost-conscious medical education JAMA Pediatr 2015 169 109 111 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2964
  6. Zendejas B Wang AT Brydges R Hamstra SJ Cook DA Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review Surgery 2013 153 160 176 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.025
  7. Foo J Cook DA Tolsgaard M How to conduct cost and value analyses in health professions education: AMEE guide no. 139 Med Teach 2021 43 9 984 998 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838466
  8. Tolsgaard MG Cook DA New roles for cost as an outcome: opportunities and challenges Med Educ 2017 51 680 682 10.1111/medu.13328
  9. Schulz KF Altman DG Moher D CONSORT 2010 statement. Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials Ann Intern Med 2010 152 726 732 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
  10. Husereau D Drummond M Petrou S Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement BMJ 2013 346 f1049 10.1136/bmj.f1049
  11. Cook DA Beckman TJ Bordage G Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review Med Educ 2007 41 737 745 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02777.x
  12. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles Ann Intern Med 1987 106 598 604 10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-598
  13. Haynes RB Mulrow CD Huth EJ Altman DG Gardner MJ More informative abstracts revisited Ann Intern Med 1990 113 69 76 10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-69
  14. Cook DA Beckman TJ Bordage G A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing Med Educ 2007 41 1074 1081 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02861.x
  15. Foo J Cook DA Walsh K Cost evaluations in health professions education: a systematic review of methods and reporting quality Med Educ 2019 53 1196 1208 10.1111/medu.13936
  16. Drummond MF Jefferson TO Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ economic evaluation working party BMJ 1996 313 275 283 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275
  17. Reed DA Cook DA Beckman TJ Association between funding and quality of published medical education research JAMA 2007 298 1002 1009 10.1001/jama.298.9.1002
  18. Cook DA Reed DA Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the medical education research study quality instrument and the newcastle-ottawa scale-education Acad Med 2015 90 1067 1076 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000786
  19. Cook DA Stephenson CR Wilkinson JM Costs and economic impacts of continuous professional development: a systematic scoping review Acad Med 2021 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004370
  20. Moher D Liberati A Tetzlaff J Altman DG Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Ann Intern Med 2009 151 264 269 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  21. Sanders GD Neumann PJ Basu A Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine JAMA 2016 316 1093 1103 10.1001/jama.2016.12195
  22. Neumann PJ Sanders GD Russell LB Siegel JE Ganiats TG Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine 2016 2 New York Oxford University Press 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190492939.001.0001
  23. Cook DA Levinson AJ Garside S Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review Med Educ 2011 45 227 238 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03890.x
  24. Clune WH Levin HM McEwan PJ Methodological strength and policy usefulness of cost-effectiveness research Cost-effectiveness and educational policy 2002 Larchmont, NY Eye On Education 55 68
  25. von Elm E Altman DG Egger M The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies Ann Intern Med 2007 147 573 577 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
  26. Horsley T Galipeau J Petkovic J Reporting quality and risk of bias in randomised trials in health professions education Med Educ 2017 51 61 71 10.1111/medu.13130
  27. Howard NM Cook DA Hatala R Pusic MV Learning curves in health professions education simulation research: a systematic review Simul Healthc 2021 16 128 135 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000477
  28. Plint AC Moher D Schulz K Altman DG Morrison A Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials? A systematic review 2005
  29. Mills EJ Wu P Gagnier J Devereaux PJ The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement Contemp Clin Trials 2005 26 480 487 10.1016/j.cct.2005.02.008
  30. Jefferson T Smith R Yee Y Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions: prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and the Lancet JAMA 1998 280 275 277 10.1001/jama.280.3.275
  31. Pitkin RM Branagan MA Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial JAMA 1998 280 267 269 10.1001/jama.280.3.267
  32. Jefferson T Alderson P Wager E Davidoff F Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review JAMA 2002 287 2784 2786 10.1001/jama.287.21.2784
  33. Narine L Yee DS Einarson TR Ilersich AL Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989 Can Med Assoc J 1991 144 449 453
  34. Froom P Froom J Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts J Clin Epidemiol 1993 46 591 594 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90029-Z
  35. Wong H-I Truong D Mahamed A Quality of structured abstracts of original research articles in the British medical journal, the Canadian medical association journal, and the journal of the American medical association: a 10-year follow-up study Curr Med Res Opin 2005 21 467 473 10.1185/030079905X38123
  36. Wilczynski NL Walker CJ McKibbon KA Haynes RB Preliminary assessment of the effect of more informative (structured) abstracts on citation retrieval from MEDLINE Medinfo 1995 8 2 1457 1461
  37. Bordage G McGaghie WC Title, authors, and abstract Acad Med 2001 76 945 947 10.1097/00001888-200109000-00031
  38. Bordage G McGaghie WC Cook DA Durning SJ Carline JD Title, authors, and abstract Review criteria for research manuscripts 2015 2 Washington, DC Association of American Medical Colleges 148 156
  39. Cook DA Bordage G Twelve tips on writing abstracts and titles: how to get people to use and cite your work Med Teach 2016 38 1100 1104 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181732
  40. Higgins JPT Thomas J Chandler J Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2019 2 Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons 10.1002/9781119536604
  41. Levin HM McEwan PJ Belfield CR Bowden AB Shand RD Economic evaluation in education: cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis 2017 3 Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE
  42. Drummond MF Sculpher MJ Claxton K Stoddart GL Torrance GW Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes 2015 4 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 3, 2021
|
Accepted on: Feb 3, 2022
|
Published on: Mar 31, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 David A. Cook, John M. Wilkinson, Jonathan Foo, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.