Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Case presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus SNAPPS in a controlled setting Cover

Case presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus SNAPPS in a controlled setting

Open Access
|May 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Outcomes for simple and complex cases from the SNAPPS and OMP group

Outcomes

Simple case

Complex case

SNAPPS

OMP

p value

SNAPPS

OMP

p value

Expressing clinical reasoning

Number of justifications for the most likely diagnosis

 3.9 (1.5)

 4.4 (1.6)

 0.25

 3.9 (1.0)

 4.0 (1.4)

 0.25

Number of differential diagnoses presented

 2.0 (0.9)

 1.5 (1.3)

 0.11

 2.9 (1.3)

 2.5 (1.2)

 0.31

Number of justification for differentials

 3.4 (1.5)

 2.9 (1.5)

 0.24

 3.8 (1.5)

 3.7 (1.9)

 0.80

Number of questions and uncertainties presented

 1.6 (0.8)

 0.5 (0.8)

<0.001

 1.7 (0.9)

 0.9 (1.0)

<0.001

Number of management plans presented

 3.3 (1.0)

 3.1 (0.9)

 0.43

 4.0 (1.3)

 3.5 (1.3)

 0.18

Time

Total meeting length (minutes)

 7.6 (2.4)

 7.4 (2.5)

 0.59

 9.1 (2.1)

 8.8 (2.1)

 0.73

Summary of the case length (minutes)

 1.9 (0.7)

 2.1 (0.7)

 0.23

 2.2 (0.8)

 2.3 (0.7)

 0.51

Student’s speech length during the discussion, after the summary of the case (minutes)

 3.6 (1.5)

 2.8 (1.4)

 0.04

 4.2 (1.4)

 3.3 (1.2)

 0.010

Taking initiative to

Present the most likely diagnosis N (%)

30 (100%)

 7 (23.3%)

<0.001

30 (100%)

 7 (23.3%)

<0.001

Justify the most likely diagnosis N (%)

29 (96.7%)

20 (66.7%)

<0.001

29 (96.7%)

27 (90%)

 0.61

Present the differential diagnosis N (%)

30 (100%)

 5 (16.7%)

<0.001

29 (96.7%)

17 (56.7%)

<0.001

Justify the differential diagnosis N (%)

29/30 (96.7%)

21/23 (91.3%)a

 0.57

30/30 (100%)

25/28 (89.3%)a

 0.11a

Initiate patient management plans N (%)

30 (100%)

 9 (30%)

<0.001

29 (96.7%)

12 (40%)

<0.001

Setting the

Correct diagnosis N (%)

29 (96.7%)

28 (93.3%)

 1.00

27 (90%)

23 (76.7%)

 0.17

Right management plan promptly N (%)

28 (93.3%)

21 (70%)

 0.02

29 (96.7%)

20 (66.7%)

<0.001

Data represent mean (SD) unless otherwise specified

aOnly for students who present a differential diagnosis

Language: English
Published on: May 19, 2020
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Eleonora D. T. Fagundes, Cássio C. Ibiapina, Cristina G. Alvim, Rachel A. F. Fernandes, Marco Antônio Carvalho-Filho, Paul L. P. Brand, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.