Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of deliberate reflection on diagnostic accuracy, confidence and diagnostic calibration in dermatology Cover

Effects of deliberate reflection on diagnostic accuracy, confidence and diagnostic calibration in dermatology

Open Access
|Jul 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Mean diagnostic accuracy (initial and final diagnosis), final confidence, and final calibration as a function of experimental condition (reflection group vs control group); standard deviation into brackets

Outcome

Group

Statistics

Control (n = 28)

Reflection (n = 33)

Accuracy (%)

Initial

40.48 (13.36)

45.96 (12.35)

t(59) = 1.66; p = 0.10; d = 0.42

Final

38.4 (14.6)

49.7 (12.1)

t(59) = 3.33; p = 0.002; d = 0.84

Confidence (%)

58.87 (20.10)

64.29 (13.20)

t(59) = 1.26; p = 0.21; d = 0.31

Calibration (−1 a + 1)

 0.20 ± 0.19

 0.15 ± 0.16

t(59) = 1.32; p = 0.19; d = 0.28

Table 2

Relationship between experimental condition and accuracy, confidence, and calibration as a function of case difficulty

Difficulty

Group

p-value

Overall

Control (n = 28)

Reflection (n = 33)

Easier cases

Accuracy (%)

69.1 ± 22.3

60.1 ± 23.3

76.8 ± 18.6

0.004

Confidence (%)

67.7 ± 17.4

65.9 ± 21.0

69.2 ± 13.7

0.473

Calibration (−1 a + 1)

−0.01 ± 0.21

 0.06 ± 0.22

−0.08 ± 0.19

0.016

More difficult cases

Accuracy (%)

19.9 ± 13.5

16.7 ± 12.8

22.7 ± 13.7

0.080

Confidence (%)

55.9 ± 18.6

51.8 ± 22.1

59.3 ± 14.5

0.131

Calibration (−1 a + 1)

 0.36 ± 0.20

 0.35 ± 0.20

 0.37 ± 0.20

0.783

Language: English
Published on: Jul 9, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Galileu B. Costa Filho, Alexandre S. Moura, Paulo R. Brandão, Henk G. Schmidt, Silvia Mamede, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.