Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Support, technology and mental health: correlates of trainee workplace satisfaction Cover

Support, technology and mental health: correlates of trainee workplace satisfaction

Open Access
|Jan 2020

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Conceptual illustration of burnout, satisfaction, and wellness. These constructs share many common elements, but each also has unique aspects. For example, wellness includes an emphasis on physical health, whereas satisfaction includes more concepts related to practice logistics. All three constructs influence each other and are substantially correlated

40037_2019_555_Fig1_HTML.png

Table 1

Demographics of the survey sample as compared with national resident/fellow averages

Survey sample

National population

P

Total responses

3300

124,409

Sex

 Male

1604 (48.6%)

65,472 (52.6%)

4.96e‑5

 Female

1650 (50%)

55,021 (44.2%)

3.83e-10

 Not answered

46 (1.3%)

3916 (3.1%)

2.40e‑9

Level of training

 PGY1

41.7%

25.8%

4.23e-86

 PGY2

16.8%

23%

1.13e-10

 PGY3

17.8%

22%

3.02e‑8

 PGY4 or above

23.7%

29.2%

3.41e-11

Financial debt

 None

15.2%

19%

1.70e‑7

 Under $50,000

13.5%

*

 $50,000–$100,000

10.4%

*

 $100,001–$200,000

20.9%

27.5%

4.55e-17

 $200,001–$300,000

26.0%

26.7%

1

 $300,001–$400,000

10.9%

*

 Over $400,000

3.2%

*

Specialty type

 Medical specialty

1992 (60.4%)

74,759 (60.1%)

1

 Surgical specialty

673 (20.4%)

25,419 (19.7%)

1

 Hospital-based

631 (19.4%)

24,231 (19.5%)

1

National data are from the 2015 ACGME Data Book and AAMC Debt Fact Card. P-values are from a binomial exact test, Bonferroni corrected for multiple testing

Fig. 2

Overall satisfaction with current clinical practice environment, from a sample of 3300 US residents and fellows. The vast majority of resident/fellow respondents were ‘very’ or ‘somewhat’ satisfied

40037_2019_555_Fig2_HTML.png

Fig. 3

Factors ranked by survey respondents as likely to influence their satisfaction and/or as particularly functional or dysfunctional. Each stacked bar identifies the percentage of respondents who ranked an item as highly impactful (top 2/7) or non-impactful (bottom 2/7). Original item wording is given in questions 7 and 10–13 of the survey (Electronic Supplemental Appendix 1). a respondents’ report of workplace factors’ likelihood of impacting satisfaction. b factors in respondents’ personal lives that they perceived as (un)stable. c factors that respondents felt were high/low life priorities. d the degree to which respondents perceived problems in the domains they identified as high priority. e the degree to which specific workplace factors interfered with satisfaction and education

40037_2019_555_Fig3_HTML.png

Table 2

Correlates of satisfaction (output of generalized linear regression) in a nationally representative sample of residents and fellows

Coefficient

SE

z

P >|z|

Can rely on support staff

0.065

0.003

18.9

5.41e-76

EHR improves quality of healthcare

0.023

0.003

 7.2

5.21e-13

Mental health is the most stable

0.173

0.028

−6.2

4.75e-10

Receiving feedback does not interfere with satisfaction

0.096

0.028

−3.4

8.01e-04

Filling out insurance/disability forms completely interferes with satisfaction

0.128

0.028

−4.5

6.10e-06

Regression coefficients have been rescaled to the 0–1 range, and standard errors scaled proportionately. In all cases, a larger coefficient means that an increase in that variable implies greater satisfaction. Self-perception of stable mental health and a perception of high burden from paperwork/disability forms were the strongest predictors of satisfaction

EHR electronic health record

Table 3

Factors associated with perceived interference in resident/fellow education and job satisfaction from completing disability/insurance paperwork

Coefficient

SE

P(>|t|)

Sex

 Female

−0.236

0.067

4.71e-04

 Not stated

−0.101

0.289

0.726

Age (base: 25–34 years)

 18–24 years

−0.097

0.325

0.766

 35–44 years

 0.227

0.123

0.065

 45+ years

 0.180

0.367

0.624

Training setting (base: university)

 Academic clinic

−0.128

0.131

0.327

 Multi-specialty group

 0.792

0.413

0.055

 Private practice

 0.363

0.346

0.293

 Community

 0.074

0.091

0.413

 VA/Military

 0.645

0.300

0.032

 Other

 0.556

0.418

0.184

 Year in training

 0.115

0.023

5.53e-07

Debt (base: no debt)

 <$50,000

−0.060

0.124

0.630

 $50,000–100,000

−0.161

0.130

0.216

 $100,000–200,000

 0.098

0.115

0.394

 $200,000–300,000

−0.004

0.109

0.973

 $300,000–400,000

−0.054

0.131

0.679

 >$400,000

 0.015

0.210

0.944

Specialty group (base: hospital-based)

 Medical outpatient

−1.009

0.110

<2e-16

 Surgical

−0.965

0.124

8.75e-15

Negative coefficients correspond to negative emotion, i.e. to finding paperwork more burdensome

Language: English
Published on: Jan 17, 2020
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Vanessa A. Stan, Ricardo Correa, Jessica R. Deslauriers, Semyon Faynboym, Tina Shah, Alik S. Widge, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.